HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #21  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2006, 4:26 PM
J Church J Church is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 12,883
^ That would probably require nine figures' worth of track work. And it wouldn't solve the problem of having to wind along the shoreline between Martinez and Richmond. If you want to make the Caps fast, you're going to need a tunnel--a long one.
__________________
San Francisco Cityscape
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #22  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2006, 4:47 PM
pdxstreetcar's Avatar
pdxstreetcar pdxstreetcar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,300
Dont get me wrong I love the idea of moving the station.

The only reason I'm surprised is because that isn't some tiny rural wooden depot but a decent sized brick terminal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #23  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2006, 5:47 PM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 7,928
Yeah, and the terminal has been around for quite a while. Some really nice cieling details and a huge mural on the inside too. Maybe it will be on an episode of "Mega Movers" in a couple years.

That historic office building (REA) will stay put. Here's some site plans from the city's website.
http://cityofsacramento.org/generals...11_Sec3-12.pdf
__________________
Riding out the crazy train
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #24  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2006, 6:09 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by plinko
Is the plan to also move the adjacent historic office building? The one that was supposedly being renovated by LPA?


Actually i believe the plan is to move the station only and to connect it to a new facility so that the historic section serves as a gateway. The additional REA Building would remain where it is.

The railroad wants the tracks straightened so that longer trains (such as the Zephyr) aren't wrapped around that bend just east of the station.

Here is an early rendering of the Historic and new Intermodal facility. In the rendering you can see the station moved (I think they want to move it 400 feet north). In the rendering the REA building remians.

The REA building is complete and though I'm not sure how many tenants occupy the building now, Starbuck's was the first to open in the renovated building.



(photo rendering courtesy of Sugit)...

BTW the train turing in the rendering will be the new 7th street alingment of the RT trains.
__________________
Sacramento
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #25  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2006, 7:56 PM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,182
^Interesting setup for the new intermodal station. Why so much open space on the station's present location?
__________________
"You need both a public and a private position." --Hillary Clinton, speaking behind closed doors to the National Multi-Family Housing Council, 2013
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #26  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2006, 8:14 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint
^Interesting setup for the new intermodal station. Why so much open space on the station's present location?

I'm not sure how they came up with that much space or why they chose to show a rendering of a new building in what is now the parking lot of the station. I know that the City was trying to think of creative ways to help pay for the relocation and renovation and it's possible that they are considering selling the land (which is now the parking lot that fronts I street) in order to raise funds. But that's just specualtion on my part.

I think the Railyards master plan actually call for open space (or a public plaza of some sort) in the current parking lot and in the new space created by moving the station North.

The Parking Lot though to my recollection isn't that big.


I just hope they can find a way to make it a reality because that station, with it's history and rising passenger totals can make a huge impact for DT Sacramento and rail.
__________________
Sacramento
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #27  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2006, 4:52 AM
Richard Mlynarik Richard Mlynarik is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by J Church
^ That would probably require nine figures' worth of track work. And it wouldn't solve the problem of having to wind along the shoreline between Martinez and Richmond. If you want to make the Caps fast, you're going to need a tunnel--a long one.
Not much tunnelling is necessary to get commerically-useful (ie I-80-slaying)
speeds from much of the Bay Area to Sacramento:
http://www.arch21.org/BARegRail.dir/regrailindex.html
http://www.arch21.org/BARegRail.dir/.../mapindex.html
http://www.arch21.org/GEprojects/GEindex.html

The shorter-distance trains can continue to use the slower route:
that's how this sort of things is done everywhere else in the world,
after all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #28  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2006, 5:12 AM
J Church J Church is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 12,883
Via Altamont, sure.
__________________
San Francisco Cityscape
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #29  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2006, 5:58 AM
tuy's Avatar
tuy tuy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tracy, CA
Posts: 3,084
http://tracypress.com/content/view/3634/2/

Slow start for new train

Written by John Upton/Tracy Press

The new late-morning ACE train is leaving Tracy mostly empty, but officials hope that ridership picks up with a little more time.

Not very many people took advantage of the new middle-of-the-day train between Stockton, Tracy and San Jose, but Altamont Commuter Express employees are convinced it’s a good start.

“Midday trains are usually a very slow burn,” said ACE chief executive Stacey Mortensen, who said she hoped up to 250 people would eventually catch the service that began Monday.

Mortensen said existing services were expected to fill as customers gained more options for leaving Tracy and returning home.

The new westbound train, which leaves Tracy for San Jose at 10 a.m., and the new eastbound train, which leaves Tracy for Stockton at 1:45 p.m., opens up the Bay Area to seniors and students Monday through Friday, Mortensen said.

The midday trains are using three cars with up to 380 seats — but she said one might move to another service to relieve crowding there.

The new trains connect with the Bakersfield Amtrak line in Stockton, and all services connect with the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit system in Pleasanton.

Aboard Tuesday’s new morning service, ACE operations manager Hubert Hanrahan said commuter numbers were slightly stronger than they were Monday, when about 30 passengers hitched a ride on the inaugural run. He said he expected the number to grow by Friday as word and advertising spreads.

Cisco Systems compliance engineer and frequent ACE traveler Keith Han, who was one of four people to catch the 10 a.m. service from Tracy on Tuesday, said the new timetable would make it easier to bring his wife and three kids to San Jose for day-trips.

He said three existing services, which leave Tracy between 4:52 a.m. and 6:58 a.m., are too early for his family.

“Now it’s more convenient because we don’t have to rush,” he said.

A round-trip between Tracy and San Jose costs an adult $15.

The new train is part of an overall effort to improve ACE service. More than 20 ACE trains on the existing morning and evening runs were delayed by between 15 and 45 minutes this month, and Mortensen said she hoped dedicated ACE rails would cut back on delays within three years.

“The economy out here is booming and (Union Pacific is) pushing a lot of freight containers through this area … So the capacity that we have is just slowly ebbing away.

“My full-time effort is to try to get our own track. We’re going to buy it where we can, lease it where we can, and build it where we can.”

Copper wire thieves also caused delays by stealing overhead wires that allow ACE trains to communicate with one another. Mortensen said ACE was trying to work around this by switching to radio communications.
__________________
Current Metro - Stockton 679,687 Jan, 2007 CADOF Estimate
Current City - Tracy 80,505 Jan, 2007 CADOF Estimate
Former Metros - Kansas City, Cleveland/Akron, Omaha, Lincoln, Dallas/Ft. Worth
Travelled to 19 Countries on Six Continents
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #30  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2006, 1:20 AM
fflint's Avatar
fflint fflint is offline
Triptastic Gen X Snoozer
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 22,182
Another small step toward Megalonorcal:

Monterey-Salinas Transit Launches Line to San Jose
Round-trip buses to run every day

By Kevin Howe
Monterey Herald Staff Writer
August 26, 2006

Monterey-Salinas Transit unveiled its new Monterey-San Jose Express service Friday at the Monterey Transit Plaza.

MST's Line 55 will provide three round-trip bus runs between downtown Monterey and downtown San Jose starting Monday.

On hand for the inaugural at Jules Simoneau Plaza in Monterey were Rep. Sam Farr, D-Carmel; Assemblyman Simón Salinas, D-Salinas; and Supervisor Fernando Armenta.

The Line 55 Monterey-San Jose Express will originate in downtown Monterey and stop at the Monterey Parking Garage, Monterey Transit Plaza, Edgewater Transit Exchange, Prunedale Park & Ride, Gilroy Caltrain Station, Morgan Hill Caltrain Station, San Jose State University, downtown San Jose and the San Jose Diridon Train Station.

The line will serve as the Monterey-to-San Jose Amtrak Thruway bus that was eliminated in 2005. The line will operate every day of the year, offering a transportation alternative for commuters and travelers. It will also offer transfers to and from Capitol Corridor trains that operate between San Jose, Oakland and Sacramento, Caltrains that operate between San Jose and San Francisco, and Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority bus and light rail services.

Fares will be $6 from Monterey to Gilroy or Morgan Hill, and $8 for the full Monterey-to-San Jose trip. MST customers who use day passes or monthly all-zone passes will be allowed free transfers to VTA local buses and light rail lines.

Line 55 Monterey-San Jose Express is funded by a federal grant from Jobs Access Reverse Commute, VTA and Caltrans through the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #31  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2006, 5:09 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,007
Another version of the CC story

Amtrak adds service between Sacramento and Bay Area
Sacramento Business Journal - 2:58 PM PDT Thursday by Melanie Turner Staff writer

Amtrak's commuter service has launched its largest-ever expansion, running 32 trains, up from 24 trains, each weekday between Sacramento and Oakland. The expansion includes six additional trains, for a total of 14 trains (seven each way) that travel as far south as San Jose.

With the expansion, the frequency of commuter trains between Sacramento and Oakland now equals the frequency of trains on Amtrak's commuter route between New York and Boston.

The new trains also run at more convenient times, including a new 7 a.m. weekday departure out of Sacramento, and a 3:35 p.m. departure, which closes a two-and-a-half hour gap between 2:10 p.m. and 4:40 p.m. trains. "If someone was coming up for a lunch meeting they had to hang around for a while," said Priscilla Kalugdan, marketing manager for the Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority.

The expansion took effect Aug. 28. No additional funds were used in the expansion, Kalugdan said. Equipment is being used more efficiently to increase the frequency of trains, she said.
__________________
Sacramento
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #32  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2006, 8:13 PM
slock slock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 383
I had a question about TJPA and the property acquisition for DTX.

Is all the property they acquire going to be demolished or is it some legal requirement that they own property that they tunnel under? They discussed about 20 individual properties at their meeting yesterday. That would be a lot of demolition.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #33  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2006, 9:54 PM
ltsmotorsport's Avatar
ltsmotorsport ltsmotorsport is offline
Here we stAy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Parkway Pauper
Posts: 7,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by fflint
^Interesting setup for the new intermodal station. Why so much open space on the station's present location?
It's Sacramento; we just LOVE our open space, even when it won't be used.
__________________
Riding out the crazy train
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #34  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2006, 7:25 PM
urban_encounter's Avatar
urban_encounter urban_encounter is offline
“The Big EasyChair”
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 🌳🌴🌲 Sacramento 🌳 🌴🌲
Posts: 6,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by ltsmotorsport
It's Sacramento; we just LOVE our open space, even when it won't be used.

You'll thank city leaders for all of that open space in 20 years....


Thre's not much the local politicians do right in Sacramento. But along with the vision of light rail, the establishment of open and public spaces downtown, is to be applauded.
__________________
Sacramento
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #35  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2006, 7:56 PM
TowerDistrict's Avatar
TowerDistrict TowerDistrict is offline
my posse's on broadway
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in an LPCA occupied zone
Posts: 1,600
I do like the landuse plans for the depot district and the railyards in general. i've been happy with the city so far, in that "open space" has not been abused, but rather thoughfully included.

in the depot case, i think it will be a great buffer between the intermodal station and many acres of office and residential mixed used development. see the small snapshot below:

__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Map of recent Sacramento developments
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #36  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2006, 9:44 PM
J_Taylor's Avatar
J_Taylor J_Taylor is offline
S.F. needs more Neon.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eurtweeka,CA
Posts: 668
Its good to see them bringing Light Rail to the station.
__________________
Jay Taylor
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #37  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2006, 3:34 AM
BTinSF BTinSF is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Francisco & Tucson
Posts: 24,077
I figured we just had to have these pics of the Bay Bridge work and its consequences being done this weekend (for out of towners, they are rebuilding the ramps to be more earthquake resistant and the Bridge is shut to eastbound traffic all Labor Day weekend while they tear down the old ramps):

No traffic:


The barricade:




Some people never "get it"




And there are exceptions--a bus transporting the baltimore orioles to their game in Oakland (one wonders why they didn't land and stay there):


Surveyor:


The work:










Traffic on the other bridges:

Richmond-San Rafael:


Westbound (how they plan to get home is a ??)


Golden Gate:


Lombard St. to the Golden Gate:


The Golden Gate ramps:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #38  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2006, 6:35 AM
EastBayHardCore's Avatar
EastBayHardCore EastBayHardCore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Inner Sunset
Posts: 5,047
Caltrain f'ing rocks.

-------------------------------

Published Wednesday, August 30, 2006, by Caltrain

Caltrain Releases Sneak Peak at Peninsula Rail Travel in 2025

Caltrain released a preview of its system-wide capital improvement
project, known as Project 2025, which looks down the road to where
rail service on the Peninsula will be in 20 years. The plan explores
enhanced scenarios that outline various increased service level
options and necessary capital requirements for each.

The overall goal of Project 2025 provides a capital investment
strategy that will improve system safety and reliability, and
supports future expansion of the system. The multi-billion dollar
undertaking first seeks to bring the railroad up to the highest
level of good repair, which is necessary to accommodate improvement
and expansion. "Think of it like someone getting into good shape
before they go in for elective surgery," said Caltrain Director of
Rail Operations, Engineering and Construction, Robert Doty. "We
can't make the system better until it's healthy enough to go under
the knife."

Some of the major projects are:

* Electrifying Caltrain's corridor and replacing diesel locomotives
with electric trains by 2012

* Improving technology and signaling equipment so that trains will
be allowed to travel faster, and to allow for increased service

* Opening the Dumbarton Rail Corridor, which will cross the bay
between Menlo Park and Union City by 2012

* Adding track and crossovers to accommodate more frequent trains
Building grade separations in key areas to assist with rail safety
and local traffic flow

* Improving the North Terminal in San Francisco to allow for
increased service and access to the downtown extension through the
Transbay Terminal

* Improving the South Terminal in San Jose, to allow for additional
service, including access to ACE, Capitol Corridor and Amtrak trains

"We could be looking at 10 trains an hour," said Doty. "But, right
now we're running a system that is little better than was operating
in the 1950s. The U.S. is a third-world country when it comes to
rail travel, but this will make Caltrain a world-class rapid rail
transit system."

Staff will deliver the final plan to the board at the October
JPB meeting. To view the slide-show preview for this plan, visit
<http://www.caltrain.com/Project2025>.


Contact: Jonah Weinberg, 650.508.6238
__________________
"This will not be known as the Times Square of the West," City Council President Alex Padilla declared last week. "Times Square will be known as the L.A. Live of the East."

Will Rogers once said, "children in San Francisco are taught two things: love the Lord and hate Los Angeles."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #39  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2006, 7:30 AM
FourOneFive FourOneFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,911
^ why doesn't their vision mention anything about an extension to Monterey, Santa Cruz, or Salinas?

does anyone know if there was ever passenger rail service on the peninsula on the other side of the coastal ranges (i.e. pacifica, half moon bay)? i've heard there was freight service of some kind at one time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #40  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2006, 5:09 PM
J_Taylor's Avatar
J_Taylor J_Taylor is offline
S.F. needs more Neon.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eurtweeka,CA
Posts: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by FourOneFive
^ why doesn't their vision mention anything about an extension to Monterey, Santa Cruz, or Salinas?

does anyone know if there was ever passenger rail service on the peninsula on the other side of the coastal ranges (i.e. pacifica, half moon bay)? i've heard there was freight service of some kind at one time.
A little bit of info..probly out of date.
http://www.tamcmonterey.org/prog_rail/index.html
__________________
Jay Taylor
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:20 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.