HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


View Poll Results: Which Chicago casino proposal is your favorite?
Ballys at Tribune 32 19.88%
Ballys at McCormick 9 5.59%
Hard Rock at One Central 13 8.07%
Rivers at The 78 86 53.42%
Rivers at McCormick 21 13.04%
Voters: 161. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2061  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2026, 2:41 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,896
Ugh. The river pedestrian frontage was the one place I was hoping they wouldn't cheap out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2062  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2026, 6:06 PM
mh777 mh777 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: River North
Posts: 259
anyone know the status with this? Did they stop construction on the hotel or not? I swear every time I go by I see work happening on the hotel/tower, and I know for sure I continue to observe the skip on the tower running. Are they only going to finish up the curtain wall and then stop? Or what's the deal?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2063  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2026, 2:51 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,834
09.01.26


Chicago Avenue east approach.


Chicago Avenue west approach.




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2064  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2026, 3:56 PM
build_tall_chicago build_tall_chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21
I swear I saw some movement today at the casino site. Paired with the news that Bally's made the $4M payment to the city, is there confirmation on the work starting again for this?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2065  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2026, 5:22 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 17,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by build_tall_chicago View Post
I swear I saw some movement today at the casino site. Paired with the news that Bally's made the $4M payment to the city, is there confirmation on the work starting again for this?
It never really stopped. It was never gonna stop completely. Bally's still needs to get the building exterior sealed up before winter, or they can't even open the — areas on time. The threat was to the non-— parts of the complex, including the hotel tower and the dining/entertainment.

At the City Council hearing last week, they revealed that even in the scaled-back plan, they're still planning to finish out several floors of the hotel tower and much of the dining/entertainment. Presumably the upper floors of the hotel tower, the big concert venue etc would be left as a shell for future buildout.

I think this is a mistake. A casino that doesn't have other stuff around it, where you need to drive in and drive out to use it, is basically just Horseshoe Hammond Casino with more traffic congestion. And it will attract the same kind of customers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2066  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2026, 10:51 PM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,265
https://therealdeal.com/new-york/2026/09/14/ballys-secures-560m-loan-for-bronx-project/

Quote:
The Chicago project includes a 2,000-foot Riverwalk extension, a 34-story hotel and convention center, a two-acre park and a smattering of restaurants and other attractions. Kim dismissed claims that construction had stalled in Chicago.

“We’re committed to opening in early 2027,” Chairman Soo Kim said on a conference call Monday. He added that the company expects to meet its $1.34 billion capital commitment and is in dialogue with city officials over the legalization of video gaming terminals and its impact on the Chicago project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2067  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2026, 11:02 PM
twister244 twister244 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,330
Hi NYGuy!

Thanks for sharing..... This is starting to make me think Bally's "stalling" was simply a stunt to try to exert pressure on the city to stop video —. Now that the effort seems to have failed - All of the sudden, they are able to find dollars to for the Bronx casino - I read this as work will probably resume on the remaining portions of the project.

Am I misreading this?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2068  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2026, 12:44 AM
NYguy's Avatar
NYguy NYguy is offline
New Yorker for life
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Borough of Jersey
Posts: 57,265
^ It looks like they are talking out of both sides....

https://igamingbusiness.com/casino/property-development/ballys-chicago-new-york/

Quote:
Kim said the purpose of convening the call was to “reiterate our deep commitment to Bally’s Chicago” and to address “inaccurate reports” from the press saying that construction had stopped or slowed after the update that was released in early August.

“Construction continues every day, and there are approximately 1,000 skilled tradespeople working on the construction of the permanent Bally’s Chicago resort,” Kim said.

The casino remains on track for an early 2027 opening, Kim asserted, but the company changed how it is “sequencing certain elements of the development”. Kim said that Bally’s was actually “over-delivering” on its commitments to the city and reset the construction timeline to better align with its Host Community Agreement. He said the company would soon be arranging tours of the construction site with investors and shareholders.
Quote:
Kim’s comments Monday were less detailed than others given before the Chicago City Council’s License Committee last week.

At that venue, the company’s President and interim Chief Financial Officer George Papanier told officials that Bally’s will “deliver the event centre, 100 rooms of the hotel and the required food and beverage components” in early 2027, per the Chicago Sun-Times. That said, the company is reevaluating about 12% of the project’s other planned amenities.....

Papanier said the components of Bally’s Chicago that are being “reset and re-contemplated” are “all in conjunction with the proliferation of VGTs”. While the current number of licences is low, he asserted that widespread proliferation could result in a “30 to 50% impact on top-line revenue” for the casino and it would be “irresponsible” to continue construction “until we understand what the landscape looks like”.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2069  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2026, 3:30 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,050
I totally get Bally's frustration with the city here, but I'd wager this is a bluff. I'm also not a fan of seeing slot machines in every bar like you do in many places downstate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2070  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2026, 6:54 PM
cloudbod cloudbod is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Chicago
Posts: 280
Some pics from yesterday:







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2071  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2026, 9:41 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,834
09.09.26
Eastern Chicago Ave river approach.












Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2072  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2026, 3:22 AM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,356
Probably wrong place to ask this but what is this bridge supposed to look like when completed?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2073  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2026, 3:37 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 View Post
Probably wrong place to ask this but what is this bridge supposed to look like when completed?


Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2074  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2026, 4:48 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 687
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
Does that move?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2075  
Old Posted Sep 18, 2026, 4:56 PM
Via Chicago Via Chicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,712
nope.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2076  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2026, 9:31 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 17,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by VKChaz View Post
Does that move?
Not in the way you might think, but the bridge is designed to be lifted on (removable) jacks in all 4 corners in the event of an oversize vessel/cargo.

The jacking thing will probably never actually happen, but technically the North Branch is supposed to have unlimited clearance up to the turning basin at North Ave. Right now that is suspended due to the bridge at Division that is out of order, but it hasn't been eliminated.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2077  
Old Posted Sep 21, 2026, 9:45 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,834
09.21.26
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2078  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2026, 1:17 AM
mh777 mh777 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: River North
Posts: 259
How’s the halsted bridge looking?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2079  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2026, 1:41 AM
vexxed82's Avatar
vexxed82 vexxed82 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 587
Looks like work has resumed:



Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.