HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4781  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2026, 5:06 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 36,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
I don’t think Americans want to invade in any significant numbers. Trump ran on a largely isolationist platform, and his turn to militarism has annoyed a lot of his supporters and contributed to the Republicans’ dire polls.
Trump may end up being constrained politically in a couple months because of 3.4% inflation and gas going up. That shows you where they are on the whole. I wonder if they can really accomplish anything significant geopolitically these days. Would they fight against China for Taiwan for example even if it means they won't get Temu orders on time?

There are certain ignorant Americans (see: Current Events) who have a "USA #1" view that causes them to think they can start wars wherever they want with no consequences, but there are always risks. The US has the world's biggest economy and strongest military but it doesn't follow from that that they can do anything without costs or don't need political buy-in. With Trump, when there are ongoing costs he persists through, it's largely in cases where he would have wanted to TACO but got stuck.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4782  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2026, 11:28 PM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: west
Posts: 3,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
I don’t think Americans want to invade in any significant numbers. Trump ran on a largely isolationist platform, and his turn to militarism has annoyed a lot of his supporters and contributed to the Republicans’ dire polls.

Trump has arguably caused more conflicts in his first 20 months than any President in history at that point in time. He obviously lied. How many of us expected the US Government would go from ally to enemy in 20 months? It was not part of their election platform either. At this point, the GOP does not care, as they are already going to rig the midterms (look at what they are doing in Texas- shuting down 30% of urban polling locations, where Democrats usually do well, and hinting ICE and the US military will also be at these locations).

We have to plan for a possible US invasion in the future, as the odds of it happening are certainly mot 0%. The US is being run by mentally unstable people, who do not respect social norms. The sooner we can prepare ourselves for a Ukraine-Russia type conflict, the better.

I know that is alarmist, but I do not care. It's sadly our reality, and the reality of any nation that raises the ire of America for real or imagined wrongs (Greenland, Mexico, Cuba, Venezuela, etc.). The US is in a massive debt, and is eyeing our natural resources to plunder.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4783  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2026, 5:12 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,429
Isn’t this supposed to be a statistics thread ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4784  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2026, 12:06 PM
KnoxfordGuy's Avatar
KnoxfordGuy KnoxfordGuy is offline
New Brunswick booster!
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fredericton, New Brunswick
Posts: 2,242
Is anyone else not able to access the stats can data daily updates? I haven't been able to see new data since last week.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4785  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2026, 3:01 PM
Pavlov's Avatar
Pavlov Pavlov is offline
Khan
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 5,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
Isn’t this supposed to be a statistics thread ?
9 in 10 posters don't care.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4786  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2026, 4:42 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pavlov View Post
9 in 10 posters don't care.
Statistically, that's almost everyone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4787  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2026, 4:49 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dartguard View Post
Investments that will severely curtail Government Climate mitigation policies.
We are abut to spend 2.6 Times what we used to spend on Defence and another 30 Billion PER YEAR on National Infrastructure such as roads, ports,
power systems and other big things. Climate will just become weather in the Canadian context and wow we all know how to handle that.
Looks like we may not know how to handle the weather that's changing as the result of global warming - at least, not in the east.

• Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4788  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2026, 8:30 PM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: west
Posts: 3,407
I'm curious to know when the quarterly population estimates come out for Canadian provinces. I see the Q2 estimates came out on June 17. I'm starting to tweak out.I need my fix!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4789  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 12:36 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post
I'm curious to know when the quarterly population estimates come out for Canadian provinces. I see the Q2 estimates came out on June 17. I'm starting to tweak out.I need my fix!
Probablement le 1er octobre.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4790  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 12:45 AM
Rhb Rhb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post
I'm curious to know when the quarterly population estimates come out for Canadian provinces. I see the Q2 estimates came out on June 17. I'm starting to tweak out.I need my fix!
Tomorrow

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/dai-quo/cal2-eng.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4791  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 2:26 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,346
The estimates have been published. 80,000 more people in Canada in Q2. Provincial growth everywhere except NWT.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4792  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 2:27 PM
Zeej Zeej is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Montréal
Posts: 585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
The estimates have been published. 80,000 more people in Canada in Q2. Provincial growth everywhere except NWT.
Clearly a recalibration as even the previous quarterly estimates have been revised upward, illustrating that not as many NPRs have left as was previously thought.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4793  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 2:35 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeej View Post
Clearly a recalibration as even the previous quarterly estimates have been revised upward, illustrating that not as many NPRs have left as was previously thought.
That's possible, but it could also be more new arrivals, whether permanent or non permanent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4794  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 4:31 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,904
Interesting. Ontario back to growth, albeit slow growth.

Yukon passed 50,000 this quarter.

BC remains below the population peak in Q4 2025, though is growing again.

Alberta continues to close the gap with BC. I bet it passes BC in a few years. Current rate shows Alberta passing BC by about 2034 or so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4795  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 4:58 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Touching grass everyday.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,774
Yukon is separating from the pack. I remember when all three territories had similar populations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4796  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 6:45 PM
jc_yyc_ca jc_yyc_ca is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Calgary
Posts: 983
Nice to see numbers back in the positive. I know we were all expecting a slowdown, but when it comes to population stats, numbers in the negative always seem depressing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4797  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 7:05 PM
ericmacm's Avatar
ericmacm ericmacm is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 990
It is good to see us return to modest growth.

It will be interesting over the next few years to see how Bill C-3 influences the population growth trend. Something that is very interesting about C-3 is that it will disproportionately grant citizenship to Americans who live in California and the Northeast (specifically New England), as those are the two largest areas in the United States for Canadian ancestry. These areas are the predominant centres for science and research in various industries, and the Trump admin cuts to research back in 2025 are going to leave a lot of these people out of a job. Coincidentally, the Carney government has been pouring more money into research, whether from direct federal funds or through the EU’s Horizon program, meaning there may now be some really good opportunities, due to the combination of these factors, for these people to move to Canada.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4798  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 8:51 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmacm View Post
It is good to see us return to modest growth.

It will be interesting over the next few years to see how Bill C-3 influences the population growth trend. Something that is very interesting about C-3 is that it will disproportionately grant citizenship to Americans who live in California and the Northeast (specifically New England), as those are the two largest areas in the United States for Canadian ancestry. These areas are the predominant centres for science and research in various industries, and the Trump admin cuts to research back in 2025 are going to leave a lot of these people out of a job. Coincidentally, the Carney government has been pouring more money into research, whether from direct federal funds or through the EU’s Horizon program, meaning there may now be some really good opportunities, due to the combination of these factors, for these people to move to Canada.
It surprises me that there has been so little public controversy over a measure that can gift Canadian citizenship to someone who has had no meaningful connection with Canada for generations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4799  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 9:39 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
It surprises me that there has been so little public controversy over a measure that can gift Canadian citizenship to someone who has had no meaningful connection with Canada for generations.
I'd be upset if people weren't properly vetted and it gave access to someone with a criminal record, particularly violent crimes or involving minors. But considering how high the percentage of foreign-born residents we have in some areas many of those people having no prior connection to Canada at all, it's tough to market having an insufficiently direct connection as being some big scandal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4800  
Old Posted Sep 23, 2026, 9:51 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
I'd be upset if people weren't properly vetted and it gave access to someone with a criminal record, particularly violent crimes or involving minors. But considering how high the percentage of foreign-born residents we have in some areas many of those people having no prior connection to Canada at all, it's tough to market having an insufficiently direct connection as being some big scandal.
Is that a consideration for eligibility? People who become Canadians after immigrating have established themselves in Canada via residency and paying taxes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:33 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.