Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere
To me the list goes in terms of vibrancy:
1.Toronto
.
.
. (massive gap)
.
.
2. Ottawa
. (smaller gap)
3. Hamilton
4. Kitchener
5. London
6. Kingston
7. Niagara Falls
8. Windsor
|
I would agree with this list if the criterion were "feels like a big city". I was originally thinking of my list in terms of visitor interest. Hamilton has big city things like office towers, a big arena, a lot of public transit nodes, etc. but it's less "interesting" to an outside visitor than Kingston, in my opinion, which has a better setting (being on a waterfront), more unique historic buildings, and landmarks.
The other thing that Kingston has that few Ontario cities have (or actually, to be fair, few Canadian cities no matter where) is a central square: a public space with a recognizable landmark that is the clear centre of town. I think that alone pushes it over the edge in terms of interest above a place like Hamilton.
When I think about what makes a European city of even 50,000 worth a visit, it's usually the central square. People naturally gravitate to it, and so there's a bit of a virtuous circle where the best buildings, and the activities that generate the most pedestrian activity or revenue/ft2 congregate around it and naturally imbue it with life. You don't really get that when your downtown is just a long strip along a main street with no clear node.