HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


725 West Randolph in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #501  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2026, 1:51 AM
vexxed82's Avatar
vexxed82 vexxed82 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 581
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanDweller98 View Post
Is it just due to the width of the tower or does the rendering not look anywhere near 700 ft?
It's not just you. It feels shorter than 700' in the main rendering. This looks like 550', maybe.
__________________
Nick Ulivieri | instagram | Bluesky | Facebook
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #502  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2026, 1:53 AM
Jstange059's Avatar
Jstange059 Jstange059 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 416
This image posted on Urbanize today shows the height as 664 ft
__________________
@that-person.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #503  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2026, 1:55 AM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
look at us still talking
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,654
Add two more feet you cowards
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.

All you need is a modest house in a modest neighborhood, in a modest town where honest people dwell.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #504  
Old Posted Jun 19, 2026, 4:35 AM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,167
That’s from their PD from 3 years ago, the elevations and sections list different heights for some reason.

Going by section you can see it’s 14.5ft per floor X 8 additional floors so that’s an additional 116ft. I don’t know what’s accurate but assuming there’s no massive design changes this will be comfortably be 700-800ft tall.

https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city/depts/dcd/cod/725_w_randolph_presentation.pdf
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #505  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2026, 9:53 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,809
Not sure if this article was posted, fingers crossed they get approvals & financing and hope we hear something soon. It does sound like the anchor tenant is a done deal and not speculative though.


Related Midwest lands anchor tenant for 725 W. Randolph

https://chicago.urbanize.city/post/related-midwest-lands-anchor-tenant-725-w-randolph

Quote:
The tower still requires City Council approval as it seeks to amend the site’s existing Planned Development. Approvals are needed from the Chicago Plan Commission, Committee on Zoning, and City Council. Related Midwest is also reportedly nearing a deal to secure financing for the tower as they seek to break ground next year and finish construction for Sidley to move into the new space in late 2030.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #506  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2026, 10:10 PM
Jstange059's Avatar
Jstange059 Jstange059 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 416
Not really relevant, but the tower almost feels like a dark version of this proposed tower in a different city. Has the same stepping setback, and outdoor recessed balcony space appearing like a hole in the building, and general proportions
https://i.ibb.co/8D45s90v/IMG-1386.webp
Lumen tower, Strijp S, Eindhoven
__________________
@that-person.bsky.social

Last edited by Tom In Chicago; Yesterday at 1:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #507  
Old Posted Yesterday, 4:52 AM
The Lurker The Lurker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 718
^^ Jesus Christ, don't scare me like that!
__________________
Not all those who wander are lost -J.R.R. Tolkien
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #508  
Old Posted Yesterday, 2:57 PM
twister244 twister244 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Lurker View Post
^^ Jesus Christ, don't scare me like that!
Agreed! I saw that image and immediately was like "OMFG WHaT DiD ThEy DO??????"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #509  
Old Posted Yesterday, 3:06 PM
cloudbod cloudbod is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Chicago
Posts: 246
^ Same lmaooo

Despite the jumpscare, you're right Jstange, the designs are pretty similar-- It's interesting how much aesthetic value comes from the little inset corners on the floorplates of 725 W Randolph's southern edge. It rounds out the setbacks in a more graceful way than the tower in Eindhoven, despite all their similarities! Cool find

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jstange059 View Post
Not really relevant, but the tower almost feels like a dark version of this proposed tower in a different city. Has the same stepping setback, and outdoor recessed balcony space appearing like a hole in the building, and general proportions
https://i.ibb.co/8D45s90v/IMG-1386.webp
Lumen tower, Strijp S, Eindhoven
__________________
Chi freelance designer / game dev / alley rat
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #510  
Old Posted Today, 2:03 AM
Jstange059's Avatar
Jstange059 Jstange059 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 416
Sorry about the jumpscare!
__________________
@that-person.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:39 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.