Quote:
Originally Posted by MIPS
I was expecting the lower-quality market rental rooms to be around $1500/month, not north of $5000...
Because even since the start there was heavy questions surrounding who this was being built for, partially on taxpayer dime.
|
It's not being built on taxpayer dime.
They took out a Federal loan that was available to any developer (including non-First Nations affiliated developer).
Presumably they will pay back said loan.
One may want to argue that the terms of the loan were less forgiving than a typical loan would be - and hence the part that the taxpayer is dime-ing.
But the counter to that argument is that it was equivalent of a stimulus to the housing market and housing sector by the Feds to help juice up supply in the housing market - which is a standard expenditure for any administration in office.
When administrations on both sides of the aisle get to office they tend to make these kinds of economic expenditures to stimulate the economic or economic growth writ large or in specific sectors - be it tax cuts, spending bills or loan programs like this - and it's fair to argue that in all cases they're doing so,..."on taxpayer's dime".
But in this case it's a loan that will be paid back with interest - which means the tax payer will make money - not lose it - presumably on top of getting more housing stock and supply.