HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #341  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2026, 3:13 PM
ColdRain&Snow's Avatar
ColdRain&Snow ColdRain&Snow is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Tall Forehead View Post
So the developers of the unfinished looking frankenbuilding on Mayfair near Main Street wanted to install a couple of tacky looking illuminated signs on the roof. Not sure why they'd want to draw more attention to this thing, but thankfully PPD staff rejected the idea.

https://legacy.winnipeg.ca/PPD/Documents/CityPlanning/Reports/26-164336-VC.pdf
Lol don't feel bad for them. At least finish painting the concrete first. The building looks like it still hasn't been finished.
__________________
"Build baby build."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #342  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2026, 3:24 PM
wags_in_the_peg's Avatar
wags_in_the_peg wags_in_the_peg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 3,779
i think more lighted up building names would be fine, i think it would look kinda neat.
__________________
just an ordinary Prairie Boy who loves to be in the loop on what is going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #343  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2026, 3:58 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 7,618
I hate everything about the unfished look of this building but i do think the sign is pretty cool. I'm sure they will appeal this rejection.

Sometimes the overregulation here is just so dumb. In China, entire skylines light up at night and become tourist attractions with their elaborate light shows. Yet here, our bylaws won’t allow a rooftop sign—though the exact same signs would be approved if they were simply dropped from the roof onto the building façade, between the top-floor windows and the roofline. I mean, who even cares?





The BMO sign on 201 Portage was initially rejected too, and only got approved after an appeal.

__________________
Winnipeg Act II - April 2024

Winnipeg Developments

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #344  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2026, 4:30 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is online now
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,963
What an awkwardly located sign. Could that be more of an afterthought? They have the money for that but. It to slap a coat of paint on that bare concrete.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #345  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2026, 6:55 PM
borkborkbork's Avatar
borkborkbork borkborkbork is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,702
As tacky as it is, I don't understand why building signs require all this additional approval, when you can have equally or more garish building lighting, signs affixed to the building itself, etc.

And, everyone gets nostalgic for the era of big garish neon lights everywhere, but we don't allow anyone to actually do anything like that anymore...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #346  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2026, 7:32 PM
WinCitySparky's Avatar
WinCitySparky WinCitySparky is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,374
Green sign with hideous purple/pink vanity-bulb lighting and unpainted concrete, truly wish an eternity of root canals on the people responsible for that
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:15 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.