HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Nov 29, 2022, 1:18 PM
thebasketballgeek's Avatar
thebasketballgeek thebasketballgeek is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lulz View Post
No need for this monstrosity.
Stop building out and start building up.
They are building up tho. Much better then building 508 single-family houses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2023, 2:58 PM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 3,409
Waverley West

In 2004, when Waverley West was announced, as new suburb that would accommodate 40,000 residents, it was expected to take 40 years to complete. However, here were are 19 years later and it looks as though nearly 75% of the area is built up.

When do you think WW will be completed, and did it live up to the expectations that you had when it was initially announced?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2023, 8:27 PM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 3,409
Considering the masses of people that are arriving in Winnipeg, where should the next big residential development be located?

My vote is for "Wilkes South"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2023, 8:58 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackDog204 View Post
Considering the masses of people that are arriving in Winnipeg, where should the next big residential development be located?

My vote is for "Wilkes South"
My vote is for the city of Winnipeg to charge development fees that are quite stiff or to let the surrounding municipalities take a swing at large scale suburban development.

That said, your Wilkes south proposal would be likely within city limits.

The roads in the area will need a massive upgrade if we keep adding new driving-required suburbs. Route 90 --> access elimination and new grade separations, BG --> grade separations, Perimeter --> accelerate upgrades, Headingly Bypass --> construct, etc.

It should to a large extent be developer driven too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Dec 4, 2023, 11:40 PM
cheswick's Avatar
cheswick cheswick is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,014
Local planning areas of the city. i think Wilkes south is currently listed as semi-rural. I assume this has to be changed?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2026, 11:56 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
Quote:
Bridgwater residents fed up with Manitoba Housing eyesore
Malak Abas
Wednesday, Jul. 22, 2026


MIKE DEAL / FREE PRESS

The empty lot on Silver Creek Road in Bridgwater has been left to grow wild all summer. Residents who live nearby are frustrated with the eyesore, but the city says it is powerless to do anything because it doesn’t have jurisdiction.


A weed-covered plot of land in Bridgwater has been left to grow wild all summer, raising the ire of neighbours who say they were told the property is owned by Manitoba Housing and bylaw officers cannot intervene.

The piece of land on Silver Creek Road sticks out: it is one of few empty plots in the south Winnipeg area and is packed with weeds and garbage. A sign erected in the middle of the land warns the plot is private property.

Several residents of surrounding homes told the Free Press the land hasn’t been mowed or cleaned for months, and the three-foot weeds have attracted pests.

“Definitely, we have to tell (the city) to clean up because (there) are so much insects, and we have rodents sometimes,” said Manpreet Kaur, whose home is next to the plot.

Another resident told the Free Press they had repeatedly reached out to 311 and were told the city’s hands are tied because the property is owned by Manitoba Housing, and bylaw officers are unable to intervene.

“Unfortunately, because this property is owned by Manitoba Housing, bylaw enforcement services have no jurisdiction,” says an email to a resident from 311.

She described the situation as a “blame game” between the city and the province.

“You guys are all pointing the finger at each other, all making excuses,” said the resident, who asked to not be named.

Kaur said her husband, Jaspreet Kaur, has repeatedly asked the city to take action — either by cutting the grass or ordering the owner to do so — for years. She said her husband has considered starting a petition.

“We are concerned because of the lot, and sometimes we get so much with the winds, garbage that’s collected on the corner, and it doesn’t look good,” she said. “We pay a lot of … taxes, it’s a good neighbourhood, they have to do something.”

A spokesperson from the provincial government confirmed the property is owned by Manitoba Housing and said it would be cleaned within 48 hours. The delay in cleaning it is due to “significant rainfall.”

The city councillor for the area said it’s a common issue in Bridgwater.

Manitoba Housing owns several pieces of land in the area. Its goal is to develop and sell them, and use the profit to pay for inner-city housing, said Waverley West Coun. Janice Lukes.

It’s Manitoba Housing’s responsibility to maintain them. Lukes said the properties are subject to complaints from homeowners.

“Manitoba Housing is not a seasoned developer,” Lukes said. “They are not … I don’t know how to say this nicely, but this has been a nightmare for me, because this isn’t their forte, this is not their area of expertise, so it’s not their priority.”

Lukes said she regularly hears from constituents about poorly managed lots and will drive around the neighbourhood noting unkempt areas to flag to David Pankratz, the NDP MLA for the area.

“We’re constantly calling Manitoba Housing on pieces like this, and it’s ridiculous, (the weeds) are up to my hips, it’s tall,” she said. “We’ll call them, they’ll send someone out.”

A West Broadway landlord was handed a city compliance order this month to clean up “an accumulation of garbage” on his riverfront apartment property that had been left by a homeless encampment.

The order warned that, if the city had to remediate the space, the cost could be added to his property taxes.

Lukes said the city could “technically” issue a similar order to Manitoba Housing, but because there’s consistent contact between the city and the province, it’s faster to deal with it through that line of communication.
Winnipeg Free Press
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2026, 5:36 AM
ColdRain&Snow's Avatar
ColdRain&Snow ColdRain&Snow is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 1,591
Oh no, a vacant property has weeds on it. Meanwhile inner city residents are dealing with drug addicts, homeless encampments, and high crime on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2026, 5:55 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdRain&Snow View Post
Oh no, a vacant property has weeds on it. Meanwhile inner city residents are dealing with drug addicts, homeless encampments, and high crime on a daily basis.
lol this was the best line:

Definitely, we have to tell (the city) to clean up because (there) are so much insects
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2026, 2:09 PM
bussche bussche is offline
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 161
Oh no, the "Bridgwater Concerns Complaints and Compliments" Facebook group escaped into the wild lol.

I don't known why that group was suggested to me, a resident of St. Matthews, but it's hilarious. So entitled.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2026, 3:56 PM
neutroniks neutroniks is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 1,141
I thought that this might be appropriate to post to their facebook group lol

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2026, 2:05 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
15 Cooper's Town Rd - The Bravado Apartments


Last edited by Wpg_Guy; Jul 24, 2026 at 11:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2026, 2:13 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
70 Park East Dr. - The Allure Apartments


Last edited by Wpg_Guy; Jul 24, 2026 at 11:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2026, 2:57 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
1500 & 1510 Bison Drive - The EpiCentre


Last edited by Wpg_Guy; Jul 24, 2026 at 9:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2026, 3:24 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
300 Centre Street


Last edited by Wpg_Guy; Jul 24, 2026 at 9:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2026, 4:09 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
355 Bridge Lake Dr | The Pinnacle at Bridgwater


Last edited by Wpg_Guy; Jul 24, 2026 at 11:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Jul 24, 2026, 11:53 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
160 Centre Street


Last edited by Wpg_Guy; Jul 26, 2026 at 10:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2026, 6:51 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
Rendering vs reality

Rendering vs reality



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2026, 2:20 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is online now
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,945
Eeesh, that is quite a let down over the rendering.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2026, 3:50 PM
borkborkbork's Avatar
borkborkbork borkborkbork is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdRain&Snow View Post
Oh no, a vacant property has weeds on it. Meanwhile inner city residents are dealing with drug addicts, homeless encampments, and high crime on a daily basis.
I would buy this line, except that the city *does* take vacant properties with weeds seriously. If I have a vacant lot and a neighbour complains about the weeds they'll give me a compliance order and if I ignore it, the city will mow it and add the cost to my tax bill.

But Manitoba Housing gets to let their lots get overgrown with no consequences.

It's not a major social issue like the ones you named but it feels like part of a problem where the city can't do the very basic parts of municipal governance. (In other words: If the city and province can't figure out how to manage weeds how are they meant to deal with bigger problems)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Jul 27, 2026, 4:45 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by borkborkbork View Post
I would buy this line, except that the city *does* take vacant properties with weeds seriously. If I have a vacant lot and a neighbour complains about the weeds they'll give me a compliance order and if I ignore it, the city will mow it and add the cost to my tax bill.

But Manitoba Housing gets to let their lots get overgrown with no consequences.

It's not a major social issue like the ones you named but it feels like part of a problem where the city can't do the very basic parts of municipal governance. (In other words: If the city and province can't figure out how to manage weeds how are they meant to deal with bigger problems)
Yeah, exactly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
   
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:52 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.