HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jul 8, 2026, 1:13 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
Maintaining credibility with Manitoba First Nations and positioning Manitoba to benefit from the proposal, probably with a Churchill tie-in.
The project is also not that well defined. Its not clear where it is going in Manitoba exactly.

First Nations have a legally mandated voice. Non-first nations also have a say. Just look at the response in Alberta to data centers and coal mining.

Neither Saskatchewan or Manitoba are saying much of anything at this stage. It is probably a bit to early.

----

I think the responsible thing to do is to also ask the question, do we need to go all the way to Sarnia? Before Line 5 was built Great Lake tankers were being used. Perhaps its time to look at that option as well. Run the pipeline as far as North Bay. Then tanker it from there to Sarnia. Sounds like the desire is also to build out a strategic oil reserve. Those could be storage tankers in North Bay that are filled over the winter and then during the summer they are transferred from there to Sarnia where you have additional storage to cover the winter months.

Last edited by casper; Jul 8, 2026 at 1:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:51 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.