Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking
I never understand when people make this argument. Why does percent capacity have any relevance at all? Should the jets just take 1500 seats out of the building and their attendance problems will be solved? The only number that matters is the number of paying customers.
It’s like saying I have a restaurant that runs at 90% capacity. That sounds great but if you only have three tables, you are probably going out of business.
If you have by far the smallest arena there is no excuse for 1500 empty seats every night.
I do agree that we have more responsibility than other cities because Winnipeg isn’t really a major league market. This is why it annoys me that so many of my middle aged, white collar friends have cancelled their shares in season tickets and are now die hard fans who rarely go to games.
|
For the record, I wasn't making any kind of argument, other than maybe stats can be made to suggest good OR bad news, depending on how they're presented.
I wrote my original comment in response to Wpg_Guy's statement that the Jets had the "second lowest average attendance" in the league last year. Technically correct. However, the team just above the Jets, the Anaheim Ducks, had an average attendance of 15, 670. If the Jets had sold out every single game, they
still would have had the second lowest average attendance in the league.
I'm not saying it's good, bad or indifferent. It's just important to put stats in perspective.