Makes me wonder if they ever presented the revisions to the condo dwellers cause even they probably would have said 'ok, we're good with more glass'. And city planners - wtaf?
Still I don't dislike it as much as I thought I would, lol.
As for the Mormon temple, there's only a handful (I think around 10 if I recall) in Canada so I assume the quality will be good? As for Langford - you'd think starting from an established community would help with the urban feel, but I guess with the car centric design baked in it's actually easier to build on a green or brownfield, heck even a wheat field. Here's a
new neighbourhood in Calgary that seems very popular among SSP types in the photos of your city thread, yet it looks a lot like what Langford is building nowadays, but with better planning, no crappy historical residue and less surface lot parking. Still feels a bit generic and I don't know how well it'll age or appealing it will be in 30-40 years. Now we have Beachlands which will have higher density than neighbouring Royal Bay and both built on virgin land (well, reclaimed from the gravel pit) but a fresh start in terms of neighbourhood building. I'm not a huge fan of what Beachlands is doing as it feels more like linear apartments built for the view and not a well thought out neighbourhood village feel with walkable streets, public square, yadda yadda. Still early to be fair.