Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000
Totally true, but this seems to be pretty much par for the course for many older big cities, no?
|
Yep! My wife is originally from the West Valley suburbs of Phoenix. Whenever I visit, it's tough to tell exactly where Phoenix ends and Glendale begins, and where Glendale ends and Peoria begins, etc. She doesn't even really know where the boundaries for each municipality begin and end. There is no appreciable difference between Phoenix and its suburbs (save for Tempe). Meanwhile in Philly, the boundaries are much better defined (ex. Cobbs Creek and City Line Avenue delineate the city from Delco and Montgomery County). For the most part, the changes between city and suburb are abrupt once you cross a boundary (ex. crossing Cheltenham Avenue into Cheltenham Township from West Oak Lane).
I find that the older cities have a unique culture and identity relative to their suburbs. Philly, NYC, Boston, Baltimore, and DC blossomed into major population centers long before their suburbs*. The housing typography is the most obvious tell. With newer cities like Phoenix and Atlanta, I feel like their suburbs grew in tandem with their cities, leading to a lack of distinction between city and suburb.
*Suburbs in the modern sense. I recognize that many places considered city neighborhoods today would've been considered suburbs in the 18th and 19th centuries (ex. The City of Philadelphia and Northern Liberties Township were separate municipalities within Philadelphia County until the Acts of Consolidation of 1854).