Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618
Thank goodness City Council is tackling this by considering a bill that would... further curtail the Historic Commission's powers.
Again I ask, what are we doing? This is not how strong cities are built.
|
What is the point of this bill? I can't completely tell from the media reporting.
And in most scenarios, it's not as if the historic buildings we lose are being replaced with notable architecture. At a minimum, there should be a provision requiring that if a historic structure is demolished, replacement construction must begin within ~12 months or the owner faces fines or taxes.
Philadelphia has one of the most beautiful historic urban cores in the US, yet continues to chip away at it (and for what?). Its not like Manhattan where the only option is demo (or build above). There should be a middle ground between being a modern, competitive city and preserving the unique historic character. Major cities in Europe prove that preservation and modernity can coexist. I know the US has different economic and social conditions, but is it really so difficult for city leaders to think outside the proverbial box?.
Anyway, that's my rant for the day.