Quote:
Originally Posted by Londonee
Broadband - is not a booming business. We're all going to be using satellite internet in the next 25 years. Wireless - is not a booming business. Streaming? Peacock is in dead last, and basically irrelevant and I'm not sure how long it's going to be around at this spend/burn. AI infrastructure - sounds intriguing, but every company is saying something about AI to perk interest of Wall Street - what does that actually mean? IP = NBC Universal, OK. Theme Parks is a great business - with growth potential. So they're a mini Disney with declining connectivity business hanging around their necks like a bowling ball.
They spun off all their dying cable channels into a separate company (Versant) to get those off the books - I wouldn't be surprised if you see something similar with their other legacy businesses... again, their future is weird.
|
I agree that cable is near death, legacy wireless is dying and they do need an acquisition, i can't see us all using satalite in the future. There's too much signal latency due to distance, signal corrections due to weather, obstructions, congestion, etc. an all-in distributed satalite network just doesn't seem plausible in the scale that's needed. I think a hybrid fiber backbone to decentralized/distributed community nodes with wifi for last mile makes more sense. At least until something like quantum teleportation is a thing, speed of light in fiber is going to be fastest and the world expects speed.
The whole peacock thing sems like a branding issue.they probably should have just done something like Universal+ instead of coming up with some new brand, even if the symbol is recognizable. The IP is pretty good and they're still making content.