Posted Jun 3, 2026, 1:43 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,355
|
|
Miku said they were not the lessee of the space - implying that there was a third party who leased space from the casino (and the casino itself was not the franchisee).
That third party may just reopen the sushi restaurant under a different name.
The franchise agreement may have had minimum revenue or payments to Miku or other terms that the franchisee could not meet, leading to termination.
|
Threaded Mode