Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery
Thread is almost 15 years and as one post says from back then, "I remember we talked about this on here several years ago", so this issue is going on for 20 years or so. We should change the motto to "Dither City".
|
Not entirely. This time they got an actual RFPQ out the door and on the street. Have you ever written such a document package? Have you even seen such a document package? For a project of this scope, uniqueness, cost, and public visibility, production of this RFPQ would have involved much involvement from many individuals across many internal departments - lots of effort went into this. So, the City was indeed very serious in moving forward with this project now. If the results had turned out different, then this would have been the first big step to being out of the gate and to the races for the project.
I suspect that the devil in the details in this case is how the terms of reference was written. The industry didn't like it and didn't bite. It does happen from time to time, especially in unique projects such as this.
The next step will be to consult parties (internal and in industry - officially and unofficially), and with that input revise the RFPQ and re-issue it. If that happens, then it will be an indication of the municipality's genuine sense of urgency in this project getting off the ground.