HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3101  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 4:32 AM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,897
“ a lot of people are going to be walking in -50”

Since we are always just making up numbers about winter temperatures, why don’t we all just agree that it’s -100 all winter long.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3102  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 4:40 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 7,374
Railside Development Camera Feed

Live cam:

Railside at The Forks


Screen shot 05/25/2026:
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - April 2024

Winnipeg Developments

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3103  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 4:41 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 7,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
“ a lot of people are going to be walking in -50”

Since we are always just making up numbers about winter temperatures, why don’t we all just agree that it’s -100 all winter long.
People are so dramatic.
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - April 2024

Winnipeg Developments

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3104  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 1:28 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,821
I dropped off my daughter at the Forks on Sunday evening and it was packed. People everywhere. The parkade said 166 spots available. This news story is just made up sensationalization. Slow news day. Sure, when Canada Day is on parking will be a challenge.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3105  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 2:32 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,897
^exactly. The Forks can't build year-round parking capacity just for Canada Day.

That parkade also rents out lots of stalls to monthly parkers. They could end those contracts if more parking is needed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3106  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 3:56 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 3,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
I dropped off my daughter at the Forks on Sunday evening and it was packed. People everywhere. The parkade said 166 spots available. This news story is just made up sensationalization. Slow news day. Sure, when Canada Day is on parking will be a challenge.
I think the arguments are somewhat reasonable, and again, parking is not a reality that we can escape. However, the sensationalism does erode the credibility of those making the arguments, and I wish that the media wouldn't overstate their case.

The -50 thing is ridiculous to say.

I will say this though, in the past couple of years, I have found it increasingly difficult to find parking at the Forks, even during times where you might assume it would be easier such as a mid-week evening in the winter. Not saying it's situation critical, but it could become a deterent for some people as time goes on. I think a balance has to be struck, because you want to make it as convenient as possible to visit the attraction.
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3107  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 4:07 PM
Mr Tall Forehead's Avatar
Mr Tall Forehead Mr Tall Forehead is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
I think the arguments are somewhat reasonable, and again, parking is not a reality that we can escape. However, the sensationalism does erode the credibility of those making the arguments, and I wish that the media wouldn't overstate their case.

The -50 thing is ridiculous to say.

I will say this though, in the past couple of years, I have found it increasingly difficult to find parking at the Forks, even during times where you might assume it would be easier such as a mid-week evening in the winter. Not saying it's situation critical, but it could become a deterent for some people as time goes on. I think a balance has to be struck, because you want to make it as convenient as possible to visit the attraction.
Yeah, it's not uncommon for the surface lot with all the chargers right in front of the terminal to be full, but I would bet a significant amount that the number of times the parkade at the Forks was full mid-week during the winter ever is somewhere around zero.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3108  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 4:19 PM
Sheepish Sheepish is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 452
I sense the bigger question with the linear park is if it will impact movement in and out of the Forks - ie by removing two lanes rather than just parking. I am not weighing in one way or another as I don't know what the traffic flow is like now, and what is predicted in the coming years. I will say that the linear park looks great and should be seriously assessed, and perhaps conceptually could be employed in other areas downtown - Graham for eg or related to BRT lanes downtown. ANYTHING that can be undertaken to add green space, recreational space and beauty downtown should be jumped on!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3109  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 5:09 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,821
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
I think the arguments are somewhat reasonable, and again, parking is not a reality that we can escape. However, the sensationalism does erode the credibility of those making the arguments, and I wish that the media wouldn't overstate their case.

The -50 thing is ridiculous to say.

I will say this though, in the past couple of years, I have found it increasingly difficult to find parking at the Forks, even during times where you might assume it would be easier such as a mid-week evening in the winter. Not saying it's situation critical, but it could become a deterent for some people as time goes on. I think a balance has to be struck, because you want to make it as convenient as possible to visit the attraction.
I think it is almost certain that in the near(er) future they will need another parkade structure. But the fact we will have gotten rid of those disgusting gravel surface parking lots will be a win in my books.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3110  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 5:13 PM
NewIreland NewIreland is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
I think it is almost certain that in the near(er) future they will need another parkade structure. But the fact we will have gotten rid of those disgusting gravel surface parking lots will be a win in my books.
I wish they would just convert the BRT line to LRT and extend the SW transit-way to Union Station. That would certainly ease traffic for those coming and going from The Forks, AND… as a bonus, it would make Winnipeg look like a real city. Surely, they can get this done… maybe with some federal money?

Last edited by NewIreland; May 26, 2026 at 5:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3111  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 5:43 PM
Brick&BRT Brick&BRT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2025
Posts: 46
NewIreland beat me to it.

Agreed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3112  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 6:02 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,184
The problem now is where the maintenance/yard facilities would be for the LRT? Fort Rouge yards would be the place but that land is gone. Maybe CN will look to divest some of the yard space in the near future, who knows. Otherwise, there's isn't a place. The current bus transit facilities are in high demand. The new transit garage isn't enough to meet even the near future demand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3113  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 6:05 PM
bussche bussche is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
“ a lot of people are going to be walking in -50”

Since we are always just making up numbers about winter temperatures, why don’t we all just agree that it’s -100 all winter long.
Also ironic, given that outdoor activities at The Forks are extremely popular in Winter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3114  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 6:08 PM
bussche bussche is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewIreland View Post
I wish they would just convert the BRT line to LRT and extend the SW transit-way to Union Station. That would certainly ease traffic for those coming and going from The Forks, AND… as a bonus, it would make Winnipeg look like a real city. Surely, they can get this done… maybe with some federal money?
The BRT Blue Line stops on Main aren't that much further away.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3115  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 6:21 PM
NewIreland NewIreland is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
The problem now is where the maintenance/yard facilities would be for the LRT? Fort Rouge yards would be the place but that land is gone. Maybe CN will look to divest some of the yard space in the near future, who knows. Otherwise, there's isn't a place. The current bus transit facilities are in high demand. The new transit garage isn't enough to meet even the near future demand.
Build a deck over the old Earl’s site and make it a public/private partnership with housing/retail. There’s tons of room there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3116  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 8:55 PM
Brick&BRT Brick&BRT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2025
Posts: 46
The maintenance yard could also be further south. I don't think finding enough space is really an issue in our city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3117  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 9:22 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 3,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
I think it is almost certain that in the near(er) future they will need another parkade structure. But the fact we will have gotten rid of those disgusting gravel surface parking lots will be a win in my books.
Can agree with that, no controversy there. I just think the whole notion that we can ignore the way most people get around in Winnipeg is not realistic.
__________________
"Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm."
Federalist #10, James Madison
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3118  
Old Posted May 26, 2026, 9:28 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 14,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
I think it is almost certain that in the near(er) future they will need another parkade structure. But the fact we will have gotten rid of those disgusting gravel surface parking lots will be a win in my books.
I can guarantee that the forks will not be building another parkade.....they do not have the money or the desire for that...a small 200 car parkade is easily $10 million....there is no payback for that.

people will just have to walk farther.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3119  
Old Posted May 27, 2026, 1:38 AM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,184
Theres literally no space along the southwest transitway to build a rail yard and maintenance facility. Building an elevated facility along Main St downtown will never happen. There's not adequate space and that is a terrible use of land for whats a blank slate along that stretch of Main St.

The only possible place I can see it at the Brandon transit facility with some type of repurposing of land, if cn and/or via want to play ball. Sorry to derail this thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3120  
Old Posted May 27, 2026, 2:24 AM
BlackDog204's Avatar
BlackDog204 BlackDog204 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: west
Posts: 3,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
I can guarantee that the forks will not be building another parkade.....they do not have the money or the desire for that...a small 200 car parkade is easily $10 million....there is no payback for that.

people will just have to walk farther.....
Judging by the amount of obese people in Winnipeg, it is a win-win.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:21 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.