HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #481  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2026, 6:10 PM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by csbvan View Post
Interesting - 601 Beach Crescent is back, to amend the CD zone. The new concept includes the same 152 social housing units, but now more strata homes (480), and the inclusion of a 206 room hotel. Podium is a large 12-storeys (the hotel?) and the new height would be among the City's tallest at 198m.

Quote:
Permit Location: 601 BEACH CRESCENT, Vancouver, BC

Work Description: 601 Beach Crescent - Application recently submitted. Staff preparing notification - To amend CD-1 (913) under the Higher Buildings Policy to allow for the development of a 67-storey mixed-use building with 12-storey podium, containing 152 social housing units, 480 strata units, 206 hotel rooms, ground-floor commercial space and three levels of underground parking. An FSR of 12.98 and a building height of 198 m (650 ft.) are also proposed.

Type of Work: Amend CD-1

https://plposweb.vancouver.ca/Public/Default.aspx?PossePresentation=Guest&PosseObjectId=292067021
.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #482  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2026, 6:21 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,284
Thanks for pulling this into the more appropriate thread!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #483  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2026, 7:11 PM
gaviscon gaviscon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 764
Nice, let's get this built and pull some productivity from this empty plot of land
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #484  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2026, 2:52 AM
urbanight93 urbanight93 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 237
Has this building always been this tall? Or is the 198m height from the latest resubmission?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #485  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2026, 3:08 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanight93 View Post
Has this building always been this tall? Or is the 198m height from the latest resubmission?
The previously approved design was 535ft tall (53 storeys) so this one at 650ft (67 storeys) is quite a bit taller.
OLD APPLICATION:
https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/601-beach-crescent

The taller design (probably skinnier than Vancouver House)
should help balance out the bulkiness of the upper floors of Vancouver House.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #486  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2026, 3:36 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
The previously approved design was 535ft tall (53 storeys) so this one at 650ft (67 storeys) is quite a bit taller.
OLD APPLICATION:
https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/601-beach-crescent

The taller design (probably skinnier than Vancouver House)
should help balance out the bulkiness of the upper floors of Vancouver House.
I guess the big question is how much of the 12 storey podium will stick to the old design and how much of that new FSR is going into the tower. I doubt the UDP will want a 12 storey podium facing the bridge.

Vancouver House at the very top was 13,200 square feet.

https://www.structuremag.org/article/vancouver-house/

I mean if they stick to roughly the old podium layout they would need to get ~8800 sq foot floorplates for that FSR.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #487  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2026, 3:52 AM
urbanight93 urbanight93 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 237
Thanks officedweller. Nice to see a taller building proposed and another hotel in downtown south.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #488  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2026, 4:26 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
I guess the big question is how much of the 12 storey podium will stick to the old design and how much of that new FSR is going into the tower. I doubt the UDP will want a 12 storey podium facing the bridge.

Vancouver House at the very top was 13,200 square feet.

https://www.structuremag.org/article/vancouver-house/

I mean if they stick to roughly the old podium layout they would need to get ~8800 sq foot floorplates for that FSR.
I think this is from the rezoning application (not the DP approved).
80ft separation from other towers was also a factor.

https://council.vancouver.ca/20200721/documents/rr6.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #489  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2026, 6:19 PM
LowerLonsdaleMike LowerLonsdaleMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 182
I'm looking forward to a rendering for this updated proposal. Hopefully someone on here can give us a "sneak peek"!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #490  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2026, 11:54 PM
Bcasey25raptor's Avatar
Bcasey25raptor Bcasey25raptor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vancouver Suburbs
Posts: 2,866
198m? Oh come on couldnt they go just 4m taller so we can finally have something taller than the Shangri la?
__________________
River District Big Government progressive
~ Just Watch me
- Pierre Elliot Trudeau
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #491  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2026, 7:35 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,119
Disappointed to still see JYOM architecture on this. Hopefully they can bring something more thoughtful than the last iteration.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #492  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2026, 11:07 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Disappointed to still see JYOM architecture on this. Hopefully they can bring something more thoughtful than the last iteration.
Pretty sure they'll just make it taller and wider
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #493  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2026, 4:25 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,376
I think the scales on the previous design were meant to "match" the articulation on the Vancouver House facade.
If they made something tall and sleek, it would make Vancouver House look squat and top heavy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #494  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2026, 5:07 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,410
I don't think the curvy glass thing is ever going to work well with Vancouver House. They should get OMA to give them the tower they built for Holborn..



https://brooklynfoundry.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #495  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2026, 7:58 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,376
If they want to cantilever over and around the Granville Bridge ramp envelope,
they can try shear walls and rotating the floorplates like the Marilyn Towers in Mississauga
or I think even Trump/Paradox Vancouver uses shear walls for support as it rotates.
The shear walls just extend out as far as necessary to support that floor.
The drawback though is there's less flexibility in suite design because of the long concrete walls
at regular intervals.

Quote:
The torsional form of the towers is underpinned with a surprisingly simply and inexpensive structural solution. The two residential towers are supported by a grid of concrete load bearing walls. The bearing walls extend and contract in response to the sectional fluctuation created by the rotation of the floors while the balconies consist of cantilevered concrete slabs. In order to ensure the elegant edge profiles are as thin as possible, there is a thermal break in the slabs at the exterior glazing such that the insulation need not wrap the entirety of the balconies. Meanwhile, the dynamically fluid shaping of the towers, naturally aerodynamic, adeptly handles wind loading and ensures comfort throughout all the balconies. Besides providing every resident with a nice exterior place to enjoy views of Mississauga, the balconies naturally shade the interior from the summer sun while soaking in the winter sun, reducing air conditioning costs.
https://www.archdaily.com/306566/absolute-towers-mad-architects

https://www.archdaily.com/306566/absolute-towers-mad-architects
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #496  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2026, 3:40 AM
bb1510 bb1510 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
I don't think the curvy glass thing is ever going to work well with Vancouver House. They should get OMA to give them the tower they built for Holborn..



https://brooklynfoundry.com/
Just an FYI, but that wasn't the final version OMA did for Holborn that was submitted for the LOE - it's drastically different, not a bad thing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #497  
Old Posted Mar 23, 2026, 3:48 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by bb1510 View Post
Just an FYI, but that wasn't the final version OMA did for Holborn that was submitted for the LOE - it's drastically different, not a bad thing
Yeah this was the one that was the top-down looking view. I just noticed on their site they had this other view.

The previously shared one.



https://www.urbanyvr.com/bay-parkade-redevelopment-concepts/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #498  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 5:31 PM
LowerLonsdaleMike LowerLonsdaleMike is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 182
Here's the updated 67 floor rezoning application with renderings:

https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/601-beach-cres
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #499  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 5:47 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,410
The south side of the building is kind of ugly but I prefer it over the curved design which just looked weird next to Vancouver House.

Three levels of parking.

Rooftop hotel amenity terrace/pool.





https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/601-beach-cres
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #500  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2026, 5:59 PM
griswold griswold is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 211
Definitely an improvement. And it's significantly taller than the last proposal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:26 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.