Things can be confusing and it's easy to conflate stuff
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiNo Randy
In any case, to me, it seems that the overlay at 38th and Blake is doing exactly as intended. Several new properties have used it. Should I name them? Not to mention, there are still lots of infill opportunities within that zone, including the majority of Brighton Blvd, the Pepsi Bottling property, Denver Rock Drill, etc.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive
Housing Affordability?
Note -- RiNo Randy mentioned (above) the incentive offered to builders in specific areas that for adding affordable units they can gain additional height for their project. (Normally) Incentives are a good thing. One can take it or leave it but it provides a builder additional density allowances.
|
That to reiterate is totally different from this:
AI Overview
Quote:
|
Denver's Expanding Housing Affordability (EHA) policy requires new residential developments of 10 or more units to designate 8% to 12% of units as affordable (or 15% in high-cost areas) for 99 years. Developers must target income levels between 60% and 90% of the area median income (AMI). The policy also mandates linkage fees for commercial developments.
|
----------------------------------------------------
Very Fair Question
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiNo Randy
A head scratcher? In your response (right above this) you just claimed that "two Denver based builders have done very well by building in Castle Rock and Parker." So what do you mean?
|
I'm not aware that these builders 'canceled' projects in Denver to build somewhere else. I haven't spoken to either of them. My point was that two LOCAL builders did well outside of Denver and that others could make a similar decision and avoid the hassle of building in Denver.
Fair Point
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiNo Randy
Who cares if they are market rate or not. It's a fact that we need more housing - across all levels. We won't achieve affordable until there is too much.
|
I have nothing against "designated" affordable housing; in fact I'm a Big fan. But it's important to understand the differences.
I haven't typically posted about 'affordable' projects except in unique cases. That's because the interest from others has historically not been there. Of course anybody is free to post about affordable projects.
Designated affordable projects can have issues. Sometimes the quality is a bit sketchy. Sometimes the management and maintenance can be a bit sketchy.
OTOH, DHA's redevelopment of Sun Valley was very well done.
I am also a fan of market rate more affordable units as I've clearly posted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RiNo Randy
So cyclists in cities other than Denver don't need this type of protection?
|
Why would think that cities can't handle their own business.
BTW, the State isn't going be doing any monitoring. It was an unnecessary expression of ideological egos and a waste of time.