Quote:
Originally Posted by TllrSkyline-01
I agree! But it looks like it will work out in the end for now. The facility still remains in the community, and the neighbors have nothing more to complain about. NIMBYism is doing more damage to communities than people realize!
|
The irony of NIMBYism is that it’s built on contradiction. The same people who fight density and urban development, arguing that tall buildings, apartments, or mixed use projects will “ruin the neighborhood,” are the first to complain about clogged highways, endless sprawl, and crumbling infrastructure. But you can’t have it both ways. If you block density, you push growth outward, which means longer commutes, more traffic, higher infrastructure costs, and the very sprawl they claim to hate. If you block transit and infrastructure, you leave communities car dependent and gridlocked, then gripe about congestion.
At its core, NIMBYism isn’t about problem solving, it’s about protecting comfort zones, even when those protections create the very problems being complained about. It’s basically a masterclass in wanting to have your cake and eat it too. Cities can’t freeze in time, people are moving in whether we like it or not. The real choice is simple, build upward and invest in infrastructure, or let sprawl and gridlock eat us alive, pick one.