Quote:
Originally Posted by ngunda
There seems to be an interestingly high amount of overlap between those who perceive a tendency of the City (and council in particular) to meddle where they should not, and those who think the City should make a special exemption in this case and allow the extra floors to remain under some set of conditions. If you truly believe the City should stick to its knitting, how do you square that with suggesting they should decide on a case by case basis the specific response to a developer violating a DA? If they are going to deal with such matters impartially and not get sucked into making decisions they really shouldn’t be involved in (and which could create more legal trouble if they appear to favour one developer over another), ordering developers to stick to their DAs seems to be the most logical course.
|
Perhaps the lesson learned is the the city inspection department keep a closer watch on the developments that they are responsible for.
Threaded Mode