HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


595 West Georgia Street in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Vancouver Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #321  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 10:34 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,138
Rennies entire job is to sell real estate, not to predict it. There are no sales now so they downsized.

I doubt their already tiny analytics team has shrunk much as their clients are constantly asking for market updates.

Why on earth would Holborn want to 'artificially' raise their land value? Their tax burden would shoot through the roof.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #322  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 10:39 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Rennie (i.e. the people whose entire job is to read the real estate market's long-term future) massively downsized just last year.

If you or the devs are expecting another pre-pandemic level boom by the end of the decade, more power to you; otherwise, this may very well be yet another Holborn scheme to artificially raise their Vancouver land value while doing absolutely nothing with the actual land.
If no one wants to buy a luxury condo which idiot institutional fund is going to buy some overvalued land they can't do anything with?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #323  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 10:44 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
So they're going to try to raise their land value for a market that doesn't exist. If no one wants to buy a luxury condo which idiot institutional fund is going to buy some overvalued land they can't do anything with?
Why's Concord sitting on an empty brewery and an empty concrete lot under a viaduct? Why'd Holborn sit on an empty meadow for over a decade, and let their downtown hotel fall apart? They already missed their best shot ten years ago when everybody was fighting for shoeboxes; seems like the "idiots" see a point in raising land value without doing anything with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #324  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 10:46 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Why's Concord sitting on an empty brewery and an empty concrete lot under a viaduct?
They're not entitled. Holborn is literally purposefully entitling this site which will dramatically increase their tax liability.

They sat on it for well over a decade too. The fact that they are rezoning it means that has changed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #325  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 10:53 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
They sat on it for well over a decade too. The fact that they are rezoning it means that has changed.
Then I suppose they know something that everybody else doesn't; general consensus is a downturn for condos for the next few years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #326  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2026, 11:00 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Then I suppose they know something that everybody else doesn't; general consensus is a downturn for condos for the next few years.
Like I said this will take a few years to launch.

Sounds like they know exactly what everyone does....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #327  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2026, 7:19 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
"DTES-shoulder" adjacent area.
Remember when real estate people tried to market that area as "Crosstown"? That sure didn't stick.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #328  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2026, 8:10 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,681
Just for background on this project.

The earliest rezoning enquiry was around 2006 when they bought the property? 10-15 story towers?

Quote:
In 2006, the developer made a rezoning inquiry to the City of Vancouver that outlined their early conservative proposal of floor space ratio (FSR) densities of 2.0 for commercial uses—including ground-level retail—and 3.0 for market residential, plus an additional market residential bonus for the retention of Dunsmuir House.

There would also be 500 parking spaces for Hudson’s Bay, replacing the existing parkade, in addition to the parking built to serve the redevelopment.

But city staff’s response at the time deemed the redevelopment scope to be unambitious and unworthy, given the size of the property and its location on West Georgia Street, which is considered by the municipal government as Vancouver’s ceremonial street. The site is also located next to the Expo Line’s Granville Station and Canada Line’s Vancouver City Centre Station.

City staff mandated that any rezoning application of the property will only be considered if there is a minimum of 5.0 FSR of commercial space, with at least one major office tower, as well as a hotel and lower level street-oriented retail.
https://verticalurbanism.org/news-articl...scale-development-in-downtown-vancouver/

The 2006 rezoning enquiry:

https://council.vancouver.ca/20061212/documents/tt3_BayParkade.pdf

The ARC competition proposals were ~2017?

This is the 2019 enquiry with OMA (all the details are blacked out)

https://vancouver.ca/files/cov/2020-120-release.pdf

More details here:

https://www.urbanyvr.com/bay-parkade-redevelopment-concepts/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #329  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2026, 6:38 PM
Glow Fun City's Avatar
Glow Fun City Glow Fun City is offline
deadhead raver Jew
 
Join Date: Jul 2025
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 331
Some more media coverage in the Vancouver Sun today:

'New territory for Vancouver': At 315 metres, city's first supertall tower could be first of more to come
B.C. currently has no 'supertall' skyscrapers, defined as between 300 and 599 metres in height. But Vancouver city hall is now updating its policy on very tall buildings, potentially opening the door for future 'supertalls'

By Dan Fumano
Published Mar 24, 2026

https://vancouversun.com/opinion/new-ter...ertall-tower-could-be-first-more-to-come

It includes a new update on the Heritage Commission's recommendation:

Quote:
Then, on Monday, another advisory body — the Vancouver heritage commission reviewed the proposal and recommended retaining the heritage-designated Randall Building at 555 West Georgia St., instead of the architect’s proposal to retain only the facade. But the commission voted to “generally” support the project, and also supported the integration of Indigenous cultural heritage in the design of the plaza and buildings.

Reached after Monday’s meetings, project architect Gregory Henriquez said they were pleased both advisory bodies generally supported the project.

Preserving the entire Randall Building would require some changes to the plaza and the closest tower, but it would be nice to see more buildings here preserved beyond just their facades!
__________________
Don’t tell me this town ain’t got no heart
You just gotta poke around…
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #330  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2026, 8:03 PM
kikin kikin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2025
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Like I said this will take a few years to launch.

Sounds like they know exactly what everyone does....
prices will rise significantly in a few years?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #331  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2026, 8:27 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,138
That the market could very well find a new equilibrium in the next two years and you will want you entitlements ready to time the market, and not be fumbling around waiting to get permits and miss the market opportunity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #332  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2026, 8:38 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,190
With very little new supply coming on the market, specifically in the CoV for strata apartments, the equilibrium price should eventually reflect the lack of new supply. Prices may not rise significantly, and we do live in a drastically changing world, but prices should at the very least flat line from here if we are following historical trends for this market.

Add on stabilized immigration rates, rather than contraction we've seen over the last few years. Add on the FHSA that wasn't around in previous markets. And I could believe prices will rise significantly by 2030.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #333  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2026, 8:45 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
That the market could very well find a new equilibrium in the next two years and you will want you entitlements ready to time the market, and not be fumbling around waiting to get permits and miss the market opportunity.
Becuase lord knows Holborn is always quick to take action on market opportunities.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #334  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2026, 8:52 PM
gaviscon gaviscon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 770
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
With very little new supply coming on the market, specifically in the CoV for strata apartments, the equilibrium price should eventually reflect the lack of new supply. Prices may not rise significantly, and we do live in a drastically changing world, but prices should at the very least flat line from here if we are following historical trends for this market.

Add on stabilized immigration rates, rather than contraction we've seen over the last few years. Add on the FHSA that wasn't around in previous markets. And I could believe prices will rise significantly by 2030.

Generally agree as long as AI agent deployments slow down from a stock market bubble pop and rising energy costs.

If not, I expect the finance and tech driven DT Van office market taking a huge hit by 2030.
My friend works at Amazon as a backend dev and he says he barely codes since November last year thanks to Claude
I think significant headcount adjustments are coming
The souring US-Canada ties and the slowing Chinese and EU economies also does not bode well for the tourism sector after the WC

These factors aren't considered when they project the condo market to rebound thanks to slowing construction starts and immigration numbers.
Immigration numbers are also still significantly above the 2015 levels (when express entry was introduced)
and it's also doubtful that the numbers will stay as high as it is when the Canadian government is pushing for productivity and tech adoption (which is headed towards automation)

I bet Vancouver's future is increasingly purpose-built and rentals...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #335  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2026, 9:25 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaviscon View Post
Generally agree as long as AI agent deployments slow down from a stock market bubble pop and rising energy costs.

If not, I expect the finance and tech driven DT Van office market taking a huge hit by 2030.
My friend works at Amazon as a backend dev and he says he barely codes since November last year thanks to Claude
I think significant headcount adjustments are coming
The souring US-Canada ties and the slowing Chinese and EU economies also does not bode well for the tourism sector after the WC

These factors aren't considered when they project the condo market to rebound thanks to slowing construction starts and immigration numbers.
Immigration numbers are also still significantly above the 2015 levels (when express entry was introduced)
and it's also doubtful that the numbers will stay as high as it is when the Canadian government is pushing for productivity and tech adoption (which is headed towards automation)

I bet Vancouver's future is increasingly purpose-built and rentals...
I expect increased employment in the mining sector will offset some of those losses.

However, there isn't an office component to this project and downtown still has demand for residential. I do agree that most of the demand will be rental going forward, however there's next to zero strata being built right now downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #336  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2026, 9:52 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,681
Trump/Paradox seemed to do okay.

Quote:
The Trump International Hotel and Tower in Vancouver has sold out 214 luxury condominiums at an average of $1,615 per square foot, a record price for a new condominium project in Canada. The Trump tower sales included a selection of $6.4 million sub-penthouses, according to the developer, Holborn Group.
https://www.westerninvestor.com/british-columbia/trump-tower-sells-out-in-vancouver-3829268

And Little Mountain with the beneficial loan probably probably gives them the luxury to slow walk it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #337  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2026, 10:18 PM
gaviscon gaviscon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 770
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcj View Post
I expect increased employment in the mining sector will offset some of those losses.

However, there isn't an office component to this project and downtown still has demand for residential. I do agree that most of the demand will be rental going forward, however there's next to zero strata being built right now downtown.

There isn't an office component but a worsening DT Van economy means
people won't live DT in these luxury condo units. Hence what I'm saying is
the demand for condos will stay low. Sure, I think a technical rebound might happen since we're not building much, but long-term, I question whether
there will be sufficient demand for a project like this.
Mining sector mostly benefits rural and interior BC.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #338  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2026, 12:01 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,785
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Trump/Paradox seemed to do okay.



https://www.westerninvestor.com/british-columbia/trump-tower-sells-out-in-vancouver-3829268

And Little Mountain with the beneficial loan probably probably gives them the luxury to slow walk it.
Great that a wealthy Malaysian billionaire was able to take advantage of BC taxpayers to blow an opportunity to sell into the biggest property bubble Vancouver has ever known.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #339  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2026, 7:03 PM
kikin kikin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2025
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaviscon View Post
There isn't an office component but a worsening DT Van economy means
people won't live DT in these luxury condo units. Hence what I'm saying is
the demand for condos will stay low. Sure, I think a technical rebound might happen since we're not building much, but long-term, I question whether
there will be sufficient demand for a project like this.
Mining sector mostly benefits rural and interior BC.
living downtown is still ideal even if one works from home
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #340  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2026, 8:01 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by kikin View Post
living downtown is still ideal even if one works from home
Living downtown is ideal for some people. Not everyone wants the same things. I like where I live and would hate to live downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:12 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.