Parks, Plazas and Open Spaces

[J.OT13]

Originally Posted by Williamoforange

Dev fees for one must be used to pay for stated objectives.

Adding sports fields/parkland was one of those objectives, nvm that the park budget includes funding for this sort of thing.

But sure go ahead and argue publicly for the reduction of the park budget for new sports fields/parks and let us know what others think of you....

Not arguing for a reduction of the park budget. I'm arguing for the full reinstatement of O-Train frequencies. Sutcliffe has been blowing a lot of money of, sure, needed, but also questionable projects, yet O-Train frequencies was something we just "could not" afford.

[Williamoforange]

Originally Posted by J.OT13

Not arguing for a reduction of the park budget. I'm arguing for the full reinstatement of O-Train frequencies. Sutcliffe has been blowing a lot of money of, sure, needed, but also questionable projects, yet O-Train frequencies was something we just "could not" afford.

That's not the argument you've made here nor on skyrise cities, you are directly advocating against the construction of these fields and arguing asinine points about fields not being inside the greenbelt... Ignoring that they already exist...

Also, id be surprised if Leiper would be dumb enough to come out against this project, so it's not going to affect voting.

Because let's be clear here these are sports fields being built in parks exactly where such a field should go.