HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2026, 8:48 PM
BrinChi BrinChi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 473
^ Nor should they. There is nothing wrong with Rate field itself. Attendance isn't struggling because of the stadium; that's pretty obvious. They should re-sign for 10-15 years and evaluate again in 10 years. Save and invest profits in the meantime so they can buy their own next stadium.

Same story applies to the Bears as well. Stay at Soldier Field another 10 years at least.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:47 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.