Posted on Oct 21, 2008. City Report Sept 15, 2005.:
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller
It's part of the rezoning bylaw under the higher buildings policy - not sure what the final outcome was:
http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20050915/documents/ph2ym.pdf
Quote:
In a related matter, staff note that it is proposed to amend the Sign By-law (to address
previous oversight) to not allow a facia sign above the 137 m (450 ft.), as set out in the City's
General Policy for Higher Buildings. The applicant has been refining a proposal for a hotel
logo at the rooftop, which is described to be ‘more art than commerce’. As Planning staff
have proposed to review the higher building policy next year, including incorporating City
Council expectations regarding sustainability, it is proposed that signage for higher buildings
be reviewed in that context.
|
|
Despite renderings with the "S" on the east side, I thought it was to be in/on the cage at the SE corner
(just to the left of the rendered "S"). The problem is that the Park Hyatt logo is linear and would not fit there.
https://mynextcondo.com/building/shangri-la-estates/
If Westbank was smart, the hotel operator would have contractual rights to place a sign up there.
Even if subject to City bylaws, a change in bylaws would allow the hotel to erect a sign in future.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcminsen
May 16 '16, my pics

|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu
|