Quote:
Originally Posted by kikin
I'm thinking hotels are even better for a neighborhood as people are here to be out and about enjoying things and spending money. Downtown benefits from both of course, but it seems every project for residential gets hampered by "social housing" requirements so recently I am thinking the more hotels and the less residential the better for a neighborhood I live in or frequent.
|
There are no requirements for social housing in most residential developments in the Downtown. The only exceptions are where a developer proposes to redevelop existing social housing, and in the Downtown-Eastside/Oppenheimer District (DEOD). There are only 2 blocks of East Hastings in the Downtown that are covered; most of the DEOD is to the east of Main Street.
Some developers voluntarily offer to build social housing as part of their project, to count towards the calculated CAC (based on a proportion of the additional land value that a site accrues as a result of a rezoning above the base zoning in the Downtown and West End Plans). It's often more cost effective for them than providing a cash payment, or some other public benefit like childcare, and it's a way of having the lower value lower floors of a building occupied. That's the basis of the podium of Landmark on Robson and Mirabel on Davie as non-market rental housing (both now owned by the City of Vancouver).