HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1661  
Old Posted Dec 8, 2025, 11:27 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,722
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1662  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2025, 1:43 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,717
Quote:
City staff propose the following actions, among others:

Adjust development cost levy (DCL) deferrals to align with the province. By adjusting the payment timing and schedule for development charges, this could save interest costs on borrowing for developments and improve cash flow.
A temporary reduction of 20 per cent on all city DCLs. This measure could provide immediate relief for projects, especially those that are not eligible for waivers based on affordability criteria.
An additional 20-per-cent reduction in cash-in-lieu public art contributions. There are two options for public art: in-kind or cash-in-lieu. Currently there is a 20-per-cent reduction for the cash-in-lieu option, and this measure would increase that discount to 40 per cent.
Adjusting below-market rental requirements. This could mean no below-market rental unit requirements for six-storey residential buildings, and reduced requirements for mixed-use developments based on their geographic location. Mid- and highrise buildings could be eligible for additional height and density to support below-market housing. Tenant protection and relocation policies would remain unchanged.
Providing more unit design flexibility, such as removing maximum limits on floor-space-ratio exclusions for balconies and amenity spaces, standardizing unit-mix requirements and allowing flex space to be counted.
Working with the province on an attainable homeownership pilot rezoning policy. This could provide an opportunity for four-storey strata projects that include below-market ownership units for middle-income buyers.
Revising transportation demand management (TDM) and parking bylaws to pause implementation, better reflect the travel behaviours of Vancouver residents and reduce overall project costs by up to $4,300 per unit.
Adjusting and simplifying large-site policies, and pausing the mandatory application of community benefits agreements that relate to local employment and procurement requirements on large sites.
https://www.westerninvestor.com/real-est...iability-with-suite-of-measures-11602043
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1663  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2025, 11:07 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,717
But but but don't do anything.

Quote:
In Vancouver, planners say it takes a village to grow a city

Vancouver city planners believe it takes a village to grow a city. City staff are working on the creation of 17 new villages that will add more density to specific areas that aren’t already covered by existing policies.

The villages were part of the city’s Vancouver Plan in 2022 and are now a key part of the newly drafted Official Development Plan. The city has held five open houses to discuss the villages, as well as a couple of virtual information sessions, and they invited public feedback through an online survey until Dec. 12. However, few people would know that there is a plan under way to gently densify specific intersections like Commercial Street and East 20th Avenue, Heather Street and West 33rd Avenue, Knight Street and East 33rd Avenue, Oak Street and West 49th Avenue, and Macdonald Street and West 16th Avenue, to name just some of the new ‘villages.’

The plan aims to increase housing, shops and services. Some of the intersections targeted for a village, such as Nanaimo Street and East Broadway, are already undergoing densification, while others, such as Victoria Drive and East 61st Avenue, are mostly detached houses. The plan includes a total of 25 villages, but the city is currently working on 17. The remaining eight have already been rezoned, need more work or fall under other plans.

Neil Hrushowy, director of community planning for the city, said “the scale that this is happening” at is unique to North American planning. By introducing 17 new villages all at once throughout Vancouver, it will allow the city to grow intentionally.

“Instead of only opening up two or three [areas] at a time and forcing all the development into those [areas] where you get much more rapid change and it would feel a little bit more like, you know, the city imposing change by doing all these blocks at the same time, we actually allow the neighbourhoods to evolve more slowly and allow that more organic feel over time,” said Mr. Hrushowy. “And so some people actually may be frustrated, that actually you don’t get all that rapid change all at once. But I think most people would say, ‘No, it’s a chance for the neighbourhood to slowly adapt; to evolve over time, versus the pressure of a lot of change all at once.’”

The idea is to target low-density areas, said urban planner Kirsten Behler, who is project lead for the 17 villages.

Some critics of the villages plan say it is a “one-size-fits-all” approach that will homogenize the look of the city and erode existing neighbourhood character. The Commercial Street village, for example, is already a street known for revitalized heritage buildings, boutique stores and light industrial that gave Equinox Gallery a home. Would rezoning for more residential density – up to six storeys, including low-rise apartments, townhouses and multiplexes – enhance the street, or gentrify it so that legacy businesses and character get pushed out?

“We do think that the character of the village really develops over time, and it’s very much based on the people that live in it,” said Ms. Behler. “When you look at many of our low-density areas today, they essentially have had the same zoning for a long, long time, but they’re quite different.”

Old businesses won’t necessarily be displaced, she added.

“We know that lease rates tend to be more expensive [in new buildings],” said Ms. Behler. “I would say that there’s not a direct link in them displacing an old business in an older building.”

According to the city’s recently updated official development plan, more than half of Vancouver residents do not live within walking distance of their daily needs, such as shops, housing, transit, parks and schools.

Not everyone is thrilled at the prospect of more rezonings. Vancouver already has the 500-block Broadway Plan, which opened up areas for more high-rises. There is also the provincial legislation for more high-rises in transit-oriented areas.

Andy Yan, urban planner and associate professor of professional practice in urban studies at Simon Fraser University, said the focus is too often on residential instead of comprehensive land use, such as creative industrial spaces, commercial, or amenities such as schools. He also finds the approach forced, and that it doesn’t acknowledge cultural differences.

“It’s the kind of ‘tech bro’ approach. That is, ‘Move fast and break things,’ in neighbourhoods that are working. What are the consequences? What’s the impact on land values? Is this enough to nudge out existing businesses?”

Former senior city planner and head planner for Metro Vancouver, Christina DeMarco, finds the villages plan puzzling because the city’s official development plan already has neighbourhood centres that could be enhanced, instead of creating a whole new category for rezonings. As well, she said there’s too much overlap as is, between the neighbourhood centres the city has identified and rapid transit areas that have been targeted for higher densities.

“To me, it’s more fantasy than anything else. And a misuse of city resources,” said Ms. DeMarco.

She said that some retail spaces at intersections are the result of the old streetcar grid from 100 years ago. But some of those commercial nodes became irrelevant as people became car-dependent. Ms. DeMarco doesn’t see the point in trying to revitalize those small retail nodes. Instead, she believes the city should help existing neighbourhood centres such as Dunbar or Point Grey Village, or Denman Street.

“It’s no use trying to resuscitate the tiny little scraps of commercial that were there for a reason 100 years ago. The resources the city really should be putting into [the city] are around the neighbourhood centres and really figuring out how we can improve the neighbourhood centres, and how we can make them more lively and prosperous.”

Urban designer Frank Ducote, who worked at the municipal level for 25 years, said he’s always cautious when urban planners draw lines on maps. A sensitive approach to maintaining each distinct neighbourhood needs to happen, he said. The city should include tools that would put the brakes on land assemblies, for example, and encourage a “slow rate of growth.”

He said he suspects the villages might be more of a “rationale to densify particular areas of the city.”

“There are feelings about places,” said Mr. Ducote. “Physically, we call them character. How do you respond to the feeling of this place? But also, other than that, are they small owner-run businesses? Are they a whole bunch of chains? Just 7-Eleven and a gas station? Those all communicate different feelings to the people using them.

“So, modest incremental development, properly drawn neighbourhood centres as shown … modest increments of development, small frontages, walkability being emphasized, you know, that kind of thing.”
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/real-est...lopment-density-cost-of-living-business/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1664  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2025, 11:48 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,834
"Instead, she believes the city should help existing neighbourhood centres such as Dunbar or Point Grey Village, or Denman Street."

Lines like these are quite interesting as it is requesting to concentrate development along well-established business corridors that would displace and price-out all the businesses that locals love! LOL

Thanks for posting the article
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1665  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2025, 11:53 PM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 946
ABC Council just killed the Social Housing Initiative city-wide. Odds that they'll kill this too??
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1666  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2025, 11:55 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by idunno View Post
ABC Council just killed the Social Housing Initiative city-wide. Odds that they'll kill this too??
This isn't 20-storey buildings "anywhere", so quite different.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1667  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2025, 2:22 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by idunno View Post
ABC Council just killed the Social Housing Initiative city-wide. Odds that they'll kill this too??
You assume social housing is a larger headache than anything to do with the new Vancouver Plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1668  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2025, 8:30 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,717


Quote:
But the property owner’s lawyer, David Volk, objected, saying an engineering report commissioned by the owner said it could be repaired.

Earlier in the meeting, the city’s chief building official, Saul Schwebs, had said preparing the building for demolition would take five weeks, or 35 days, rather than the 21 outlined in the staff report.

Volk asked council to let the owner hire an engineer and contractor to do “structural supports to shore up this building” to make it structurally sound.

Council amended the report and the owner will get the five weeks to try to save the building.
https://vancouversun.com/news/vancouver-tweedale-block-demolition-postponed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1669  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2025, 12:54 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,901
So firebugs living large on the taxpayers' dime claim another building. Move along folks, nothing to see here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1670  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2025, 1:12 AM
madog222 madog222 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
So firebugs living large on the taxpayers' dime claim another building. Move along folks, nothing to see here.
Did you even bother to read the linked article?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1671  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2025, 5:58 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,717
Turning the parking lot of M3 (red brick building) into a data centre. Application is from Westbank.

New cafe/restaurant facing the alley.

111 E 5th Ave rezoning application

https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/111-e-5
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1672  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2025, 3:34 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Turning the parking lot of M3 (red brick building) into a data centre. Application is from Westbank.

New cafe/restaurant facing the alley.

111 E 5th Ave rezoning application

https://www.shapeyourcity.ca/111-e-5
The entire building becomes a data center, (with involvement from Creative Energy). The rezoning is necessary because the below grade floors become used for mechanical/electrical plant, replacing all the parking.

Perhaps the heat from the data centre will be introduced into the Neighborhood Energy Utility? It's not obvious how Creative could use the heat that will be generated for anything else, and the Westbank developed campus there is linked to the NEU. This proposal will no doubt replace the previous version that added a modest additional office component.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1673  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2025, 5:18 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,717
They mentioned dumping extra waste heat into the NEU when they were talking about the district cooling system.

https://mainalley.ca/net-zero-carbon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1674  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2025, 6:55 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
The entire building becomes a data center, (with involvement from Creative Energy). The rezoning is necessary because the below grade floors become used for mechanical/electrical plant, replacing all the parking.

Perhaps the heat from the data centre will be introduced into the Neighborhood Energy Utility? It's not obvious how Creative could use the heat that will be generated for anything else, and the Westbank developed campus there is linked to the NEU. This proposal will no doubt replace the previous version that added a modest additional office component.
I thought the NEU had a lock on all of the development in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1675  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2025, 9:35 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
So firebugs living large on the taxpayers' dime claim another building. Move along folks, nothing to see here.
I can't move along: it makes my blood boil knowing another one-of-a-kind heritage building could be on the demolition list simply because of lousy decision-makers. Such buildings could be made into beautiful boutique hotels or clean low-cost rental buildings in cities where people actually have brains.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1676  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2025, 9:44 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,901
I don't think a media summary of these changes was posted elsewhere, so I'll post Frances Bula's here.

Vancouver City Council approves changes aimed at offering developers some relief
Frances Bula
Vancouver
Published December 13, 2025
For Subscribers

For 30 years, the development industry in Vancouver was so flush with profit and momentum that government planners seemed to assume that it would be willing to pay for whatever the city asked for....

... Amid a crash in the condo market, halted projects, tariffs and escalating construction costs, Vancouver City Council approved a package of changes aimed at offering developers some relief, especially for multiunit projects.

Among them: new, higher rent ceilings for apartments that were supposed to be at below-market rates; a temporary 20-per-cent reduction in development fees; a break on contributions for public art; the elimination of a requirement to provide community benefits by sourcing 10 per cent of materials and labour locally; and a temporary halt to requirements for alternatives to car parking.

Those, and more, are aimed at reducing the cost of building in order to kick-start a construction industry that has been almost paralyzed the past two years by expenditures that outpace what they can get for selling or renting homes....

Vancouver’s rollback is a marked change in a city that once embraced its ability to get developers to pay for a raft of city amenities...

.... Mr. White’s report did not address the much more difficult city issue of community-amenity contributions.

Those contributions, a technique that Vancouver pioneered in the late 1980s, gives builders increased density in exchange for community benefits. They have accounted for hundreds of millions of dollars extracted from developers over the past three decades in what were called “voluntary” offers through negotiations.

Those negotiations have been getting increasingly difficult as developers have argued that they are not making windfall profits from getting extra density, since the high cost of construction means that extra floors don’t necessarily add extra revenue to a project the way they used to...


https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-vancouver-city-council-approves-development-changes/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1677  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2025, 11:57 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
I thought the NEU had a lock on all of the development in the area.
I think the data centre would equal or be higher than the output from the False Creek NEU?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1678  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2025, 5:52 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,159
Just passed this week. Not sure if we've already covered it.

Quote:
New space-saving stair designs

New space-saving stair designs will create more flexible apartment layouts, improve access to natural light and fresh air, and make it possible to build homes on smaller sites, while still prioritizing the safety of residents, visitors and first responders. They were developed following a comprehensive review of the latest research and consultation with the Vancouver Fire Rescue Services, industry experts and building officials from other municipalities...

... As approved additions to the Vancouver Building By-law (VBBL), the new space-saving stair designs can be used in buildings up to six storeys and include:
  • External single egress stairs: A single exterior stair and corridor that maximizes space efficiency, enabling more housing options such as family-sized, multi-bedroom units on smaller lots in low-density neighbourhoods.
  • Scissor stairs: Two staircases within a single enclosure, separated by fire-proofed walls, providing two pathways while saving space. A key improvement removes the minimum distance requirement between exit doors, making it more space efficient.
Developers get to save money, everybody else doesn't have to worry about dying in a fire. Rare W from this council.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1679  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2025, 4:31 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,645
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
I think the data centre would equal or be higher than the output from the False Creek NEU?
In what sense? The NEU could/would take the heat from the data centre and give them a rebate, that's the idea anyway.

What I'm saying is they are contracted to supply any and all heat and hot water in the area for new developments, so I'm not sure why Creative is involved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1680  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2025, 4:32 PM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 946
Really exciting. I hope we get a lot of those single exterior stair exterior designs for small mid-rises!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:30 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.