Posted Sep 23, 2025, 3:29 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,688
|
|
Has any developer actually signed on for this development, or is it still just a wish list from a bunch of university planners?
"Come build in our development!
It's leased land, and all the costs of servicing for district geothermal, park maintenance, roads, etc. will be determined solely by the university and passed along to the developers.
There are parking minimums, but the parking can't be inexpensive. It's either got to be underground (in a flood prone area with a high water table), or above-ground, since the main floor has to be retail.
The buildings have to be LEED Gold, exceed accessibility standards, have green roofs, be 20% more efficient than MECB, and use no water other than greywater/rainwater for irrigation. You need to install public art that costs at least 1% of your total development budget. You have to have double the usual city parkland requirements, and all waterfront spaces have to be publicly accessible. You have to have EV charging, bike parking, and car-share programs.
Also, your design will go through a committee review, and despite all these requirements, the community has to be affordable for all income levels without segregation."
Maybe these details have changed but I remember hearing a developer talk about it and their reaction was basically "lol; lmao"
|