Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad
As a Saint Johner, Envision just does not understand the ethnolinguistic and geopolitical reality of southeastern NB. Full regional amalgamation will never, ever occur. For the same reason, UdeM will never be a bilingual university (despite being in a majority anglophone community), and, there will always be separate anglophone and francophone health care authorities. To think otherwise is heresy.
But, just because regional amalgamation will not occur does not mean that regional cooperation is not possible. We have a regional policing authority (Codiac RCMP), a regional transit authority (Codiac Transpo), regional waste management (Westmoreland/Albert Solid Waste), a regional water authority, and regional wastewater management. About the only thing that could be shared without giving up complete civic autonomy would be a regional fire service.
As for SJ, they can do as they wish, although I think full regional amalgamation will not happen down there unless forced upon the region by the province. I do like the idea of Kennebecasis City however. I think Rothesay, Quispamsis and possibly Hampton would make a dandy city. 
|
First off, I think it's
you that doesn't understand individual towns, villages, and cities can keep their distinct identity and autonomy under a regional municipality, all while contributing
fairly to a regional budget. Dieppe and Moncton would still have their councils, as would Riverview, Shediac, etc, they would all retain their town councils, and their individual councillors and even mayors would represent their communities at a regional council, and one of the mayors would become the regional chair. Sure some of the communities currently outside of Greater Moncton could see the benefit of joining the success story called Moncton, while retaining their individuality and identity?
Amalgamation doesn't have to be a one size fits all approach like the Halifax amalgamation was in 1996, there are alternative models. Maybe my proposal for an expanded Greater Moncton is too ambitious, but I really do think bigger is better, especially when we're talking long term. For our cities to grow, they need things like industrial parks that take up a lot of land, but also need a lot of environmental considerations. You're right though, Greater Moncton does have a lot of robust regional cooperation than is simply not found in the Saint John Region, Greater Moncton doesn't need amalgamation nearly as bad as the Saint John region, but the potential for growth is still there for both cities, and Fredericton too. We need an ambitious long term vision for NB's big three cities, and I really think regional amalgamation should be part of the approach, while working with communities to retain their distinct identities.
I guess i couldn't help myself making it as large as I did, because I like the way resembles
Brittany on the map and a little bit like
Normandy on the map too. New Brittany | Nouvelle-Bretagne or New Normandy | Nouvelle-Normandie would be a pretty great names too, the latter especially with the Dieppe connection... maybe an even better name than New Cork
I wonder, though, do many Acadiens descend from the people Brittany and Normandy? side note: I still think it would be great to get a flight(s) to France from Moncton to airports beyond Paris, since most of the places really worth seeing in France are elsewhere than Paris (added Moncton to Marrakesh for fun). I think most French people would be more interested in l'Acadie than our "friend" New Brisavoine ever seemed to be. I really think NB could do a better job marketing our uniquely bilingual province to prospective tourists in France. Making Moncton a bigger, Frencher municipality could help attract more French tourists than the current situation and sustain flights between YQM and France.
Brampton, Missisauga, and Caledon remain distinct cities and towns within
a single regional municipality. The Peel Region proves urban, suburban, and even rural communities can exist with distinction within a single regional municipality.
What's really funny
MonctonRad, is that you've changed your tune over the years. You used to think metropolitan amalgamation was
desperately needed for SJ. :
👀
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad
Saint John will have to find ways to broaden its appeal beyond the Irving empire and heavy industry. The city has great built form and a nice natural environment, but is stifled by a small and constrained tax base. Metropolitan amalgamation is desperately needed in SJ to address this. An increased tax base is mandatory in dealing with the infrastructure deficits in the city........
|
I couldn't agree more,
MonctonRad!
Dare I speculate that you're now cautious to embrace the potential of an amalgamated SJ, as the city's economic and demographic prospects have rebounded considerably since you make this comment?
I believe amalgamation is still desperately needed, and still believe that the tax base does need to grow beyond industrial developments, and into the 50% of the CMA population that lives outside the city limits. The vast majority of Saint John's top income earners live outside the city, in communities that now make up nearly 50% of the metropolitan population, and their comfort and personal preferences should not trump the greater good of the region and city they derive their incomes from.
Even if we don't get a "one size fits all approach" like the HRM in Saint John, the Port City and "the towns by the bay" would be far better off together, as single regional municipality of distinct communities which retain their city, town, and rural councils, which would constitute the membership of the regional council, including the mayors. Moreover, there would be a regional mayor or chair position, which would be above the mayor of Saint John or Rothesey, which could be voted on by a region wide vote.
Given the dynamics of the Saint John Region, I'd be surprised if this regional leader position wasn't mostly held by residents of Rothesay, Quispamsis, Hampton, Grand Bay, etc... but at least their suburban/exurban communities would finally be contributing fairly to a
regional budget.
and yes, I still think a
new name for the RM would be in order. I think Wolastoq Regional Municipality remains the the logical choice (since it refers to the same river Saint John is named after), but it could also be interesting if the government had an official competition for the
new name of the Region. And yes, I still think it would be tremendous for Saint John to get a bit out of the very similarly shaped shadow of St. John's, Newfoundland, without wiping Saint John, New Brunswick off the map.
Yes, I'd prefer New Cork, or New Bristol (The Bristol Channel being where the UK's highest tides are, which rival the Bay of Fundy and exceed the tidal range of SJ) But in the spirit of truth and reconciliation, I think it would be hard to find a better new name for the Region than "Wolastoq".