Even though Mark campaigned on it, government-funded housing NEVER works out. You just end up with The Projects because it's the cheapest alternative compared to tens of thousands of new detached homes/duplexes/quadplexes.
These are sales of transparently high-end residences which were fine until foreign loopholes started to close and domestic sales dried up as money got tighter. Bailing out the auto industry saves a massive logistics chain of perpetual employment. Bailing out a condo development at best saves a bunch of low-quality union and temporary jobs until the project completes, then they are dispersed to find another site to apply at. Waving the threat of there not being enough housing because they can't do their own math is an asshole move to play.
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext
Which takes us back to prices in what year?
|
This also. The era of the urban $100000 home is never coming back but when someone says sales and/or value is down X%, that's typically year over year, not overall. The number becomes far less important to most of the population still looking at $15000 off an otherwise still $875000 house. It's like buying a car for $65000 and being told you get $3000 cash back. Big woop? Just tell me the car is $62000.