Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanImpact
The main obstacle from building tall, if it isn't the FAA, are residents, not the City. Cities react to what their constituents want and most residents do not want what you are describing and appreciate the art deco historic district.
Try walking around Sunny Isles, it's a glorified vertical suburb with no street life.
|
I drove by SIB (in the night around 1-2 AM), so I couldn't really gauge the street life in SIB. Most of the residents in Miami Beach are practically the elderly, liberal Democrats who don't want any change, whatsoever. That includes bringing in a transit line (heavy rail, light rail, or monorail) to Miami Beach, because they believe that such a line will "destroy" the character of that city, which is bull!
It's one thing to protect certain districts such as South Beach from overdevelopment, which I can understand since South Beach (especially Ocean Drive) is very iconic, but to keep the entire city the same housing stock because a lot of the houses were built in the 1920's to the 1940's is very short sighted, to say the least!
A 75-story tower could hold as many as 150 to 300 households, whereas a two-story house can only hold up to about one or two households, depending on how the house was designed. The fact of the matter is that SIB has constant growth, while Miami Beach has had negative growth since the 1980's. And the fact that Miami Beach is losing the majority of it's Spring Break and Memorial Day business to Ft. Lauderdale Beach (
https://www.axios.com/local/miami/2025/02/21/south-beach-spring-break-business-downturn;
https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/miami...reak-business-owners-push-back-22681539/;
https://www.instagram.com/p/DGYKiPgO60B/), by the time the 2030's commence, Miami Beach will just be a neon-covered open-air museum with little to no life. I can understand the issues with safety and violence, but advertising to Spring Break and Memorial Day tourists not to come to Miami Beach was the wrong move, no matter how you flip it!