Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark
Maybe tearing down houses that people could live in, to be left as vacant lots potentially for years? Why is this not an issue?
|
Aesthetically, they are ugly IMO. The one next to those being torn down is the only nice house on that side of the street.
I'd rather see that space ready for eventual redevelopment... no matter how long the wait.
Judging from the outside, I don't know how habitable they are at present, and if they were, there would be like 10 people living in this space maximum. Doesn't seem like good land use.
But, hey, you guys can group-think all you want. It would seem that different opinions are no longer welcome on this forum.
Threaded Mode