HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1581  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2025, 1:44 PM
BruceP BruceP is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamy-developer View Post
This was exactly my thoughts too ^^

They may mark and say it's "temporary" but temporary for how long? Seeing Related own all of this plot of land, it could be anywhere from 2-5 years time until it gets developed
2-5 years would be breakneck speed when it comes to a massive real estate development. Big things take time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1582  
Old Posted Sep 20, 2025, 6:02 PM
dreamy-developer's Avatar
dreamy-developer dreamy-developer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceP View Post
2-5 years would be breakneck speed when it comes to a massive real estate development. Big things take time.
Yeah, my example was exaggerated. But to make my point that we'll have this "temporary" parking lot for years on end.
__________________
All I want are bus lanes on Michigan Ave
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1583  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2025, 4:30 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by VKChaz View Post
To that end, in terms of the overall development, wouldn't it be preferable to have the stadium pushed south?
Maybe, but the stadium also relies on accessibility to CTA and to the expressway. Pushing it south would likely shift more (car) traffic to 18th St and put heavier pedestrian traffic on 15th St thru Dearborn Park.

Without a new CTA station, the south end of the 78/former DPI site may indeed be a good spot for a Chinatown/South Loop neighborhood high school, probably a similar footprint to Walter Payton (~4 acres).
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1584  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2025, 6:59 PM
lakeshoredrive lakeshoredrive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 494
Could an orange line station be built on the southern end of the lot? By wentworh and 18th street? Not sure how feasible it is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1585  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2025, 9:23 PM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
look at us still talking
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakeshoredrive View Post
Could an orange line station be built on the southern end of the lot? By wentworh and 18th street? Not sure how feasible it is.
The Orange Line should really have a stop around Chinatown anyway...
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.

All you need is a modest house in a modest neighborhood, in a modest town where honest people dwell.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1586  
Old Posted Sep 22, 2025, 11:34 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by lakeshoredrive View Post
Could an orange line station be built on the southern end of the lot? By wentworh and 18th street? Not sure how feasible it is.
CTA generally requires ~500' of straight and level track for infill stations. You have such a segment along 18th by the police station, but a CTA station there would be a steel behemoth over the street with major impacts to the townhouses next door. Really the Orange Line skirts a bit too far around The 78 for any infill station to really be convenient.

There's a reason planners settled on a Red Line infill stop at 15th to serve The 78, it's really the best location (even though the track is neither straight nor level at that location in the tunnel).
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1587  
Old Posted Sep 26, 2025, 2:25 PM
lakeshoredrive lakeshoredrive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 494
The city council approved the plan yesterday so it looks like Chicago Fire will start construction soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1588  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2025, 6:02 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,710
Cerimonial groundbreaking perhaps...

09.26.25
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1589  
Old Posted Oct 7, 2025, 3:33 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,710
10.03.25
Cutting grass and clearing brush.


__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1590  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2025, 9:35 PM
KWillChicago's Avatar
KWillChicago KWillChicago is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,145
Referring to the collapsed concrete in the above picture, is that an old wall or a sidewalk/walkway? That would have been a sweet view for a bike ride back in the day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1591  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2025, 5:26 PM
Chicago Shawn's Avatar
Chicago Shawn Chicago Shawn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by KWillChicago View Post
Referring to the collapsed concrete in the above picture, is that an old wall or a sidewalk/walkway? That would have been a sweet view for a bike ride back in the day.
That was the top of the old concrete riverbank, dating back to when the channel was straightened here in 1930. Just north of this spot, the wall still is in place and has railroad ties embedded into the top of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1592  
Old Posted Oct 9, 2025, 7:20 PM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 16,838
Yeah, I would imagine a new seawall/sheet piling here is a top priority for Related now that they finally have a real anchor tenant again.
__________________
la forme d'une ville change plus vite, hélas! que le coeur d'un mortel...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1593  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2025, 5:10 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,710
10.09.25
(Tie)ing the past with the future.....
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1594  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2025, 12:46 PM
mh777 mh777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: River North
Posts: 233
Very excited about this project as well as Bally's. FINALLY getting rid of two major plots of land downtown. Both of these will really help fill in their respective areas.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1595  
Old Posted Oct 10, 2025, 2:17 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by mh777 View Post
Very excited about this project as well as Bally's. FINALLY getting rid of two major plots of land downtown. Both of these will really help fill in their respective areas.
To me, it's more about these strategic locations along the river. I feel like Bally's and this project are going to create that push to build out a Riverwalk of some kind from where it's at now in downtown. Obviously that will take time, but if done in segments over time, my hope is you can start to create a world class walk way that goes from downtown to the South to this stadium, and to the North to Bally's and beyond eventually.

I'm assuming funding is ready to go for this? I haven't really followed the money trail on this project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1596  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2025, 3:56 PM
mh777 mh777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: River North
Posts: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
To me, it's more about these strategic locations along the river. I feel like Bally's and this project are going to create that push to build out a Riverwalk of some kind from where it's at now in downtown. Obviously that will take time, but if done in segments over time, my hope is you can start to create a world class walk way that goes from downtown to the South to this stadium, and to the North to Bally's and beyond eventually.

I'm assuming funding is ready to go for this? I haven't really followed the money trail on this project.
Don’t get me excited! If they found a way to connect 78 with Bally’s using a riverwalk that would be a game changer for the city…

I believe Mansueto is funding this himself? So there should be no issue with funds.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1597  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2025, 6:24 PM
nomarandlee's Avatar
nomarandlee nomarandlee is online now
My Mind Has Left My Body
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
To me, it's more about these strategic locations along the river. I feel like Bally's and this project are going to create that push to build out a Riverwalk of some kind from where it's at now in downtown. Obviously that will take time, but if done in segments over time, my hope is you can start to create a world class walk way that goes from downtown to the South to this stadium, and to the North to Bally's and beyond eventually.

I'm assuming funding is ready to go for this? I haven't really followed the money trail on this project.
Yep. Obviously, developing and highlighting the river has been a top priority of the last few decades, but I feel there is never a bad time to speed up the timeline and double down on efforts. The river, from Ashland in the south to Montrose in the North, should be a continuous riverwalk string with river-facing homes and businesses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1598  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2025, 3:42 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,696
Pending permits for the stadium, the formal address is 1331 S Wells St.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1599  
Old Posted Oct 24, 2025, 4:39 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Pending permits for the stadium, the formal address is 1331 S Wells St.
Nice! I'm pretty excited for this, mostly because it's a jump start to finally get this land developing and it's on the river.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1600  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2025, 6:38 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,710
11.05.25
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:18 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.