Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff
^^^This
They can build up the port all they want, but if they don't have the pipelines or the production increase to get product there what is the point. I get that this is the reason why it has shifted to the second batch. I was reading on how Alberta can't just flip a switch to get more production going. There is significant and lengthy timelines to get the volumes up to make Churchill viable.
They also mentioned this on CJOB yesterday.
There is still major concern regarding the length of season to make the port viable.
|
Climate zealots keep claiming the ice will disappear, but Arctic ice stopped receding 20 years ago and more recently has been growing. The media never reports this. Unless this trend reverses, it does not bode well for Churchill. Expensive port infrastructure, especially something like LNG requires nearly year-round access.
Threaded Mode