HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2025, 6:24 AM
Insigne Insigne is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by worldlyhaligonian View Post
It would seem like all the buildings along here are now vacant as of the new year.

What are the odds on a demo in the near term? Is SOQU moving along at a good pace?
SOQU seems to be moving along nicely. Noticed 4 or 5 concrete trucks lined up there the other morning. Suspect by the time demo and excavation is done for SGW they will be able to move on. I was really hoping both SGW and the Promenade would be built at the same time as I live a block away. It's amazing how the noise (more so than the physical vibration) from the excavation is carried for blocks through the bedrock and into the neighbouring foundations.

Having said that I would assume that living this close they will have to do physical property surveys (in the case of physical damage from blasting) and we haven't received any notices.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2025, 10:55 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 9,993
Building permit has been submitted for 30 Floors - 438 Units.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Sep 3, 2025, 9:55 PM
ScovaNotian ScovaNotian is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 242
This one is all fenced in now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2025, 5:52 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 36,020
I wish there had been a bit more heritage preservation here but I think this will be good and is needed.

I wonder what can or will be done about the older tower-in-park type highrises around here. They break up the commercial parts of the street and generally don't make a lot of sense since they front onto parks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2025, 12:57 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
I wish there had been a bit more heritage preservation here but I think this will be good and is needed.

I wonder what can or will be done about the older tower-in-park type highrises around here. They break up the commercial parts of the street and generally don't make a lot of sense since they front onto parks.
What ones are you thinking of? I can't think of very many that would qualify for that category aside from Summer Gardens, the condo on the corner of SGR and Summer which has always been very high end. There isn't much commercial now on the western half of SGR.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2025, 4:35 PM
terrynorthend terrynorthend is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
What ones are you thinking of? I can't think of very many that would qualify for that category aside from Summer Gardens, the condo on the corner of SGR and Summer which has always been very high end. There isn't much commercial now on the western half of SGR.
I'd add Embassy Towers across the street from dexel, and the weirdly 45 ⁰ angled tower beside Sacred Heart.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Sep 6, 2025, 6:19 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 36,020
I'd include most of the stuff between Robie and Summer in there, although there are a couple of small older buildings. Then that 45 degree building terrynorthend mentioned. Beyond that, Park Vic and to some degree the building that has/had Smitty's in it.

Some of these are really bad (the 45 degree one) and others could just use a minor tweak to make them a bit more welcoming and mixed use. A local example would be the shops along the Brunswick St apartments by Scotia Square, although I think those are just so-so and that stretch is still not great.

Along the commercial streets in Vancouver's West End, many old residential highrise buildings have been given storefronts and nicer, more urban landscaping than they had originally. Some are really successful. These are along Davie, Denman, and Robson.

Here is an example of what I'm talking about: https://www.google.com/maps/@49.2866758,...26yaw%3D254.3783059862514!7i16384!8i8192

If you look up you will see those are 60's-70's type towers and originally they would have probably had a setback, some grass, and the lobby. There's also a small infill building there. The painted building is quite old (60's?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2025, 12:08 AM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,916
Embassy is also condominiumized which complicates things somewhat I’d imagine.

I’m unsure what you would be seeking here with this. Aside from 5770 (the 45 degree place) which may use that green space for a tenant amenity somehow (I have no idea), I don’t know what you’d want here. The one that had Smitty’s has other commercial storefronts as well, and is pretty close to the sidewalk. SGR is nothing like that picture from the west coast where those storefronts were built out right to the sidewalk and look rather ugly, quite frankly. SGR has a certain feel granted by the Public Gardens, Sacred Heart and some of those buildings carry that on. It is hardly like there is great demand for commercial space there. Restaurants along that stretch have closed with great regularity. I think you’re reading too many planning theory textbooks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2025, 4:49 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 36,020
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
It is hardly like there is great demand for commercial space there. Restaurants along that stretch have closed with great regularity.
But the population around there is set to double in the next few years. It was very underdeveloped with low lot coverage and surface parking. If you look on Google you will see empty lots on Carlton, one of which is now being developed. SGW and the other project are huge and will bring in a lot of units.

There could also be a redevelopment of the small brick Domus Realty building.

It's not a matter of dogmatically redoing everything, but as density goes up it makes sense to use the space more effectively. Making of the landscaping and planning choices of the 60's and 70's were dubious of value to begin with or made less sense over time.

Other changes I can think of are to make Balcom Square into a more useful actual urban square or pocket park, and redo the plaza of that concrete medical building on the corner.

For the 45 degree building, any ground-floor amenity lost can be built on the rooftop of the new structure. It seems like a very poorly designed structure originally, not using the lot well yet also being unnecessarily tall in a location that casts a shadow on the Public Gardens. The block just south of the gardens actually is a place where something like a 10 storey limit makes sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2025, 7:08 PM
Keith P.'s Avatar
Keith P. Keith P. is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,916
There were long and bitter debates on the height of not 5770 (the 45 degree building) but of Summer Gardens when it was proposed. The Public Gardens being north of SGR means that shadows move over the course of the day and so there is only a transient effect assuming there is any at all. Plus those buildings are some distance away from the Gardens. In the case of 5770 the area between the sidewalk and the building entry appears to be the roof of the underground parking which may limit the ability to do much depending on the engineering.

As for the development this discussion is about, the renderings I’ve seen show the requisite coffee shops and restos/retail at sidewalk level, so the residents will not be thirsty or hungry.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2025, 5:32 PM
beyeas beyeas is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,318
“Preliminary project timeline Key Dates:
Project Start (Demolition) August 25th, 2025
Excavation Complete October, 2026
Tower Crane October, 2026
Structure Complete April, 2028
Final Occupancy October, 2029

If you are interested in receiving more information on our project, we invite you to sign up for our newsletter at [email protected]”

springgardenwest.com
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2025, 6:27 PM
Saul Goode Saul Goode is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by beyeas View Post
“Preliminary project timeline Key Dates:

Project Start (Demolition) August 25th, 2025

Excavation Complete October, 2026
That must be one helluva hole they're digging.

Lots of underground parking, maybe? Or lots of blasting...or both...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2025, 10:53 PM
Dmajackson's Avatar
Dmajackson Dmajackson is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 9,993
^There will be 5 levels of underground parking.

Construction Management Plan - 5960 Spring Garden Road
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Sep 11, 2025, 11:13 PM
Drybrain Drybrain is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,568
From the construction management plan:

"The development is planned to have 5 levels of underground parking below street grade. If bedrock is found, the contractor will apply for a blasting permit and adhere to the HRM blasting by-law and conditions of the blasting permit.

Alternatively, if a blasting permit can not be obtained, the site’s bedrock will be broken by a series of rock breakers to reach footing elevation."


Sounds...time-consuming.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2025, 11:04 AM
Saul Goode Saul Goode is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dmajackson View Post
^There will be 5 levels of underground parking.
There you go. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2025, 11:05 AM
Saul Goode Saul Goode is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drybrain View Post
From the construction management plan:

"The development is planned to have 5 levels of underground parking below street grade. If bedrock is found, the contractor will apply for a blasting permit and adhere to the HRM blasting by-law and conditions of the blasting permit.

Alternatively, if a blasting permit can not be obtained, the site’s bedrock will be broken by a series of rock breakers to reach footing elevation."


Sounds...time-consuming.
Not to mention noisy!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2025, 6:53 PM
Musicman Halifax Musicman Halifax is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 84
IF bedrock is not found……. I’m still in Halifax right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2025, 7:04 PM
Saul Goode Saul Goode is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Musicman Halifax View Post
IF bedrock is not found……. I’m still in Halifax right?
Right you are, Barney.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2025, 11:31 PM
terrynorthend terrynorthend is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saul Goode View Post
Right you are, Barney.
A couple of dino excavators will make short work of that, until the foreman pulls the bird's tail, that is!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2025, 12:34 PM
stevencourchene's Avatar
stevencourchene stevencourchene is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 98
paid public parking?

do we know if this building will offer paid public parking?

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces > Halifax > Halifax Peninsula & Downtown Dartmouth
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:50 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.