Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport
^The Mississaugization of Toronto (and the Metrotownification of Vancouver) continues unabated.
God save us from the Lavalization (or even worse, Longueuilification) of Montreal.
|
I feel like the Lavalization/Longueuilification started a while ago with Griffintown. That's the Quebec style big, blocky high-rises with mid-rise proportions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123
I wonder if the distinctiveness of the old buildings is being overrated a bit here too. International style office buildings weren't that unique to a particular city, and even in the 1920's in the USA most cities had pretty similar architectural styles. There were some unique buildings in NYC or Chicago but a lot of the mid-sized cities had similar plans for squarish brick-and-stone highrise hotels and offices. I think there is more architectural diversity even just in glass condo towers in Toronto or Vancouver today. It isn't as much diversity as we saw in total over many waves of construction spanning centuries, but these styles will evolve too and already have been shifting. Downtown Toronto is getting more masonry elements again in new construction for example.
|
The International towers at least had different colour pallets and materials that made them a bit more unique. The black of TD, the white and horizontal windows of CIBC, the marble (originally) of First Canadian/BMO. In Ottawa, we had the black of PdV A+B and brown of PdV C, the marble of Esplanade and the wide with vertical elements of Place Bell. Montreal had interesting shapes, with the Cruciform Place Ville Marie, the elegant CIBC and Tour de la Bourse with its grey corners, black walls and voids. Edmonton and Calgary introduced more varied colours like red
The new glass towers are all the same colour pallet. Though they have different designs, the similar shades and proportions make for very dull skylines.