HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2022, 5:21 PM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
Hopefully this will get built! Not all approvals get built like we're currently seeing with Oceanwide and Parcel F, which appear to be stuck in limbo.
That's what I'm concerned with given the SF approval process and how hard it is to get something approved that is taller than a tree. But fingers crossed!

Bummer with Oceanwide.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Oct 4, 2022, 5:57 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by homebucket View Post
They should all be sent to Mars with Musk.
The sun would be better, perhaps a black hole? Maybe Pluto?

Mars is still too close and hospitable.


Quote:
That's what I'm concerned with given the SF approval process and how hard it is to get something approved that is taller than a tree. But fingers crossed!

Bummer with Oceanwide.

Couldn't they buy Oceanwide's site and finish that project?

Pretty tall buildings have been approved before though so it's not a total shot in the dark.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Oct 8, 2022, 12:47 AM
mt_climber13 mt_climber13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,287
International orange is a good choice. Looks like something frank lloyd wright would build.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2023, 1:12 AM
Charmy2 Charmy2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 374
Anybody got any news or updates about this project?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2024, 1:27 AM
gholgado's Avatar
gholgado gholgado is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 44
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2024, 3:58 AM
Charmy2 Charmy2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 374
Wow, that's kinda unfortunate. I really loved this design but hey as long as it doesn't get chopped in half in height I can live with it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2024, 4:25 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 11,313
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2024, 7:16 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,679
The title is odd, if it's going nowhere fast or on hold, why is it being redesigned?

I don't think this is bad news if it's not cancelled outright. It'd be awesome if SF could pull another ~1ker.

This design is okay but could be better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2024, 9:54 PM
gholgado's Avatar
gholgado gholgado is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 44
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
The title is odd, if it's going nowhere fast or on hold, why is it being redesigned?

I don't think this is bad news if it's not cancelled outright. It'd be awesome if SF could pull another ~1ker.

This design is okay but could be better.
Yes, I thought the title was odd too, as the article never mentioned anything about the project being criticized.

The way it was worded, it sounded like the developer voluntarily wanted to redesign it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2024, 6:19 PM
BobbyMucho BobbyMucho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 281
Quote:
Originally Posted by gholgado View Post
Yes, I thought the title was odd too, as the article never mentioned anything about the project being criticized.

The way it was worded, it sounded like the developer voluntarily wanted to redesign it.
I agree, but again... it's just clickbait headlines and scraps of information someone tried to build a newsworthy article on.

Not a huge fan of the current design and looking forward to some refinement and hopefully more interesting design overall. No loss there IMPO.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2025, 7:43 PM
Mulan's Avatar
Mulan Mulan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Posts: 327
SAN FRANCISCO | 77 Beale Street | 1225 FT | FLOORS

"On Friday the developer Hines — the company that co-developed the Salesforce Tower, which rises 1,075 feet — filed an application calling for a slender 1,225-foot tower to replace an office building at 77 Beale St. The tower, which would be 150 feet taller than the 1,075-foot Salesforce Tower, would include 1.6 million square feet of office space, along with retail and restaurants opening onto a new mid-block public garden."




https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/artic...e-20765197.php
__________________
War is shit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2025, 7:45 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,679
Hell yea! Hope they can pull it off and excited to see what the design looks like.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2025, 8:23 PM
homebucket homebucket is online now
你的媽媽
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Bay
Posts: 11,313
The specs for 77 Beale:
- ? floors, 1,225 ft
- 1.6 million sq ft of office space
- Restoration of the two original historic buildings in the PG&E/Matson Block — 215 and 245 Market Street — and the conversion of the small office building at 25 Beale St to 120 housing units

The site:
https://maps.app.goo.gl/zPayDu7KjXSaQqBeA

Quote:
Proposed San Francisco tower would forever change city skyline, dwarfing Salesforce Tower
By J.K. Dineen, Reporter
July 11, 2025

The West Coast’s tallest tower may be sprouting into the San Francisco skyline. Seven years after Salesforce Tower replaced the Transamerica Pyramid as the city’s highest skyscraper, a developer is planning to transform the former PG&E headquarters near the Embarcadero into a structure that would dwarf the Salesforce highrise by 15 stories.

...

The project, which encompasses an entire city block, also calls for the restoration of the two original historic buildings in the PG&E/Matson Block — 215 and 245 Market Street — and the conversion of the small office building at 25 Beale St. to 120 housing units. The proposal replaces an earlier plan to build a residential tower with 808 units. Hines purchased the property in 2021 for $800 million from PG&E, which moved its headquarters to Oakland.

...



What the proposed tower will look like is still to be determined. Hines was working with Foster + Partners on the earlier residential tower on the site, but said an architect has not been selected for the highrise at 77 Beale. The developer declined to comment on whether an architect would be selected through a design competition, which was how Pelli Clarke Pelli was selected to design Salesforce Tower.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/artic...e-20765197.php
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2025, 8:57 PM
tall/awkward tall/awkward is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 197
Wowzers. If it's going to be that tall I want something supernice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2025, 9:36 PM
James Bond Agent 007's Avatar
James Bond Agent 007 James Bond Agent 007 is offline
Posh
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kansas City, MISSOURI
Posts: 23,247
I bet it'll be boring.
__________________
You fill me with inertia.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2025, 10:54 PM
OneRinconHill OneRinconHill is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bond Agent 007 View Post
I bet it'll be boring.
Imagine the design of that original 992 foot skyscraper but at the new height, that would be beautiful.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2025, 11:51 PM
Dale Dale is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,937
San Francisco says go big or go home!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2025, 12:09 AM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is online now
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,680
Do it!
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2025, 2:23 AM
theskythelimit theskythelimit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 91
I’ll play the devil’s advocate and say this will not be built. 1.6 million sq feet of office when ~ 32% of office space in SF is vacant. Not to mention, Hines is the developer of parcel F that has not even broken ground.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2025, 2:04 PM
DCReid DCReid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by theskythelimit View Post
I’ll play the devil’s advocate and say this will not be built. 1.6 million sq feet of office when ~ 32% of office space in SF is vacant. Not to mention, Hines is the developer of parcel F that has not even broken ground.
I did read that AI companies are leasing up the vacant office space, and I read that there is even talk converting some of old office buildings. While I am skeptical in the near term, it wouldn't be inconceivable in maybe 10 years that SF has a skyscraper boom. Few people seem to remember that Miami was woefully overbuilt with thousands of vacant condos downtown in the mid-2000s but now it's just sprouting condo buildings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:48 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.