HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1061  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2025, 8:56 PM
Ottawa's Avatar
Ottawa Ottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 512
Canpotex is fully committed on volumes for potash sales through September 30, 2025.

This is due to continued strong demand for potash, underpinned by solid fundamentals for agricultural commodities and a sustained focus on food security in many of Canpotex’s key markets.

https://www.canpotex.com/news/canpotex-fully-committed-potash-sales-through-september-30-2025
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1062  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2025, 11:18 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottawa View Post
Canpotex is fully committed on volumes for potash sales through September 30, 2025.

This is due to continued strong demand for potash, underpinned by solid fundamentals for agricultural commodities and a sustained focus on food security in many of Canpotex’s key markets.

https://www.canpotex.com/news/canpotex-fully-committed-potash-sales-through-september-30-2025

Good News. We tend to forget about the potash terminal in Courtney Bay just chugging along adding lots and lots to tonnage numbers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1063  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2025, 2:49 PM
DyAm00394 DyAm00394 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Saint John, N.B
Posts: 2,037
A new Port Podcast episode with President of Americold talking about the upcoming cold storage facility at the Port of Saint John.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCIf_Wc3oMg
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1064  
Old Posted Jun 12, 2025, 11:47 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
https://tj.news/new-brunswick/new-brunsw...y-not-qualify-as-nation-building-leblanc

Not the best news for Holt's #1 priority proposal.

I wonder if Don Dominic would have a different opinion if we were talking about the Port of Shediac?
I think Don Dom would have been more positive if that was the case

LeBlanc said, "major projects that cross interprovincial boundaries are likely to win priority." I'd argue the port is already inherently interprovincial, and that linkages and connections between the port and other provinces can always be increased. To be fair to LeBlanc, he did immediately go on to say that port expansion projects could be addressed by the new trade corridors fund.

Video Link


Actually in this interview, that DyAm00394 posted above, the port's CEO told a story (@ 10:00) how CPKC got after the port to get the slips filled in quicker than they thought was possible, and how they rose to the challenge and got them filled quicker with a $42 million investment from the National Trade Corridor Fund. I'd like to see more of that attitude from our politicians in New Brunswick. Carney definitely seems to have that attitude, but do Don Dom and Susan Holt have that attitude too? I'd sure as hell hope so, especially since LeBlanc is in charge of the "One Canadian Economy" project.

Filling in the slip between AIM and that derelict pier, along with remediating and expanding to the south of the former sugar refinery site would give the port a lot more room to expand, and branch off into new ventures.

I don't think Dominic LeBlanc could honestly argue against Port Saint John expansion as a project of national interest. I'm sure this is going to come up many times again, and I hope New Brunswick's leaders rise to the occasion with some bigger ideas and follow the Prime Minister's lead.

Video Link


Look how much potash from Saskatchewan is exported around the world through the Port Saint John... and think of how many more things could be exported through the Port of Saint John if we see even more port expansion in the inner harbour, and maybe even a new, deepwater port at Lorneville. Like to me, these type of expansions are the type of development that could actually live up to the Prime Minister's guidelines given to the premiers to be ambitious with projects that "Build big, and build bold".

Fixing an intersection and upgrading some rail lines just doesn't seem big enough, not based on what the PM has been talking about for months now. I'm not sure why Premier Holt and her team haven't floated some bigger ideas for Port Saint John expansion yet, but I'm hopeful they still will. I also think she should be bold, and try and get the Trans Canada Highway linked up to Saint John, Canada's fastest growing container port. I think it would very much line up with the goals of creating a national transportation corridor.

Imagine if they actually push for Port Saint John to get a deepwater port at Lorneville beside the industrial park... the possibilities for what could be manufactured and exported would be immense.

A mass timber manufacturing plant at the industrial park, and warehouses for the finished product at the port of Saint John could be deemed a project of national interest. New Brunswick has a very robust forestry sector on its own, but lumber used for mass timber manufacturing could be sourced from all around Canada and linked to the Port of Saint John.

There's a huge export opportunity for Canadian mass timber to be exported to Europe, which is perhaps the largest single market for carbon friendly building materials like mass timber. Such a project for mass timber manufacturing with national and provincial funding could set New Brunswick up to have an industry that would be rising to the moment in response to Carney's national housing strategy that's calling for increasing the production of modular homebuilding, mass timber construction, and modern prefabrication technologies.

Here's hoping Holt and co think big and ensure that some Port Saint John expansion projects do end up qualify for funding as "projects national interest", as well as other projects related to the port that qualify for funding from the new trade corridors fund!
__________________
Peace and Athabasca and Coppermine and Slave, And Yukon and Mackenzie—the highroads of the brave. Saskatchewan, Assiniboine, the Bow and the Qu'Appelle, And many a prairie river whose name is like a spell. They rumor through the twilight at the edge of the unknown, "There's a message waiting for you, and a kingdom all your own. — Bliss Carman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1065  
Old Posted Jun 13, 2025, 2:56 AM
bingun bingun is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 1,178
Port's growth in 2024 linked to its diversity: CEO

https://tj.news/saint-john-south/ports-growth-in-2024-linked-to-its-diversity-ceo

Quote:
Bell Estabrooks, the port’s CEO and president, highlighted last year’s numbers at its annual general meeting Thursday morning. He zeroed in on the $31.4 million in profit (up from 2023’s $29.9 million), the 20 per cent increase in container volume from the previous year and the $6.5 million invested in infrastructure.
Quote:
Bell Estabrooks, in addressing the board and a small crowd of attendees at the meeting, echoed Keir’s comments, noting 2024 saw 1,027 vessels handled at the port. He noted that figure represents “major, major volumes that are coming through” the port, meaning many people are “making their livelihood” on the waterfront.

Politically, Bell Estabrooks told reporters the port is at the beginning of its growth trajectory and it has national attention.

“We are absolutely part of the resilient network of the future and that’s a big milestone,” he said, noting a dozen years ago Saint John was not considered a vital part of the supply chain. “I have to give total kudos to our premier, Susan Holt. She has done an absolutely phenomenal job, in my opinion, over the last couple of months helping position the Port of Saint John and the Port of Belledune with the federal government of being part of Prime Minister (Mark) Carney’s national priorities, trade diversification and all sorts of different opportunities that are in front of us.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1066  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2025, 12:24 AM
cdnguys cdnguys is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,380
The gap between Halifax and SJ container traffic is slowly but surely narrowing. 2024 Halifax down (-6.4%) and SJ up (+20%).

Halifax 509,232
SJ 184,879 (34.3% of Halifax volume, which is a climb from approx 12% of Halifax volume pre-expansion). And there is anecdotal evidence container traffic is surging this year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1067  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2025, 11:28 AM
CharlotteCountyLogan CharlotteCountyLogan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 223
I wonder if the port will release the amount of tonnage moved through the port like they do every year. Im interested in seeing how much potash was moved through the port last year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1068  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2025, 2:42 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,945
Could Port Saint John be a part of the housing solution?

Video Link


I was recently reminded of this video I saw a while back, where a Chinese construction firm did this publicity stunt where they assembled an entire ten storey modular high rise in a single day. What made me think of the port, is that these modules (made of steel) are the size of standard shipping containers.

Even if it was just a small part of the solution to rapidly building more housing in Canada, it could be worthwhile pursuing. China can certainly produce these modules a lot cheaper than Canada can, considering their low cost of labour, and gigantic steel industry.

Maybe we could even see some worker dormitories built on port lands, imported from China or other countries, where labour costs are far lower than in Canada. 🤔
__________________
Peace and Athabasca and Coppermine and Slave, And Yukon and Mackenzie—the highroads of the brave. Saskatchewan, Assiniboine, the Bow and the Qu'Appelle, And many a prairie river whose name is like a spell. They rumor through the twilight at the edge of the unknown, "There's a message waiting for you, and a kingdom all your own. — Bliss Carman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1069  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2025, 2:48 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlotteCountyLogan View Post
I wonder if the port will release the amount of tonnage moved through the port like they do every year. Im interested in seeing how much potash was moved through the port last year.
Good question. I suspect they will release them as they have in the past.

I read this article the other day about Nutrien looking to build a new potash terminal somewhere on the West Coast.

I don't think it would impact Saint John's potash numbers too much, and certainly won't be built in the next year, but port developments seem to have a lot less red tape and tend to happen a lot more quickly than other types of developments. I believe most of the potash that Port Saint John exports goes to markets where the Port of Saint John has a comparative advantage compared to west coast ports, so I can't imagine the numbers for PSJ potash will go down much if this new West Coast facility is built... and Saskatchewan sure ain't running out of potash anytime soon.
__________________
Peace and Athabasca and Coppermine and Slave, And Yukon and Mackenzie—the highroads of the brave. Saskatchewan, Assiniboine, the Bow and the Qu'Appelle, And many a prairie river whose name is like a spell. They rumor through the twilight at the edge of the unknown, "There's a message waiting for you, and a kingdom all your own. — Bliss Carman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1070  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2025, 4:39 PM
Ottawa's Avatar
Ottawa Ottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 512
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnguys View Post
The gap between Halifax and SJ container traffic is slowly but surely narrowing. 2024 Halifax down (-6.4%) and SJ up (+20%).

Halifax 509,232
SJ 184,879 (34.3% of Halifax volume, which is a climb from approx 12% of Halifax volume pre-expansion). And there is anecdotal evidence container traffic is surging this year.
Measured by individual containers, not TEU, the increase measured through Greenville, ME is bouncing between 56 - 60% above 2024.

I am assuming the mix of containers in 2025 by size is similar to 2024. I have no reason to presume that assumption is wrong.

I have no idea if the ratio of containers by rail compared to other transport methods are remaining constant. If they are, the target for 2025 should be in the vicinity of 290K.

If there is a higher percentage by rail, that final number would be relatively lower.

If the ratio is lower, the final number will be higher.

In any case, I am pretty sure the 2025 TEU numbers are going to be significantly higher than 2024.

Unfortunately, we'll have to wait until May/June 2026 to know for sure.

PS - For the entirety of 2025 so far, rail is transporting an average of 1914 containers/week. That adds up to ~150K/year TEU by itself.

Last edited by Ottawa; Jun 14, 2025 at 5:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1071  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2025, 5:11 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottawa View Post
Measured by individual containers, not TEU, the increase measured through Greenville, ME is bouncing between 56 - 60% above 2024.

I am assuming the mix of containers in 2025 by size is similar to 2024. I have no reason to presume that assumption is wrong.

I have no idea if the ratio of containers by rail compared to other transport methods are remaining constant. If they are, the target for 2025 should be in the vicinity of 290K.

If there is a higher percentage by rail, that final number would be relatively lower.

If the ratio is lower, the final number will be higher.

In any case, I am pretty sure the 2025 TEU numbers are going to be significantly higher than 2024.

Unfortunately, we'll have to wait until May/June 2026 to know for sure.

PS - For the entirety of 2025 so far, rail is transporting an average of 1914 containers/week. That adds up to ~150K/year TEU by itself.
Wonder too if the downward trend Halifax is experiencing will continue. They trended down over 15% in the last few years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1072  
Old Posted Jun 15, 2025, 2:17 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,945
Hopefully Port Saint John’s growth doesn't need to come entirely at the expense of the Port of Halifax. I don’t think it has so far, but it’s logical that shipping companies would chose Saint John over Halifax, when SJ is closer to bigger markets.

I expect the Port of Halifax will see lots of opportunities for growth if Canada rises up to the occasion and realizes the Prime Minister’s ambitions to increase our trading relationships with Europe.
__________________
Peace and Athabasca and Coppermine and Slave, And Yukon and Mackenzie—the highroads of the brave. Saskatchewan, Assiniboine, the Bow and the Qu'Appelle, And many a prairie river whose name is like a spell. They rumor through the twilight at the edge of the unknown, "There's a message waiting for you, and a kingdom all your own. — Bliss Carman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1073  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2025, 1:37 AM
bingun bingun is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 1,178
During tonight's council meeting regarding the Lorneville industrial rezoning, the CEO of Port Saint John spoke in favour and answered a few questions from councillors. It is worth listening to for those interested in the port.

https://www.youtube.com/live/fYt36jYpnhI?si=AK5i_bGulLOk_Xh2&t=6198

To give Craig credit, he is very articulate and a natural speaker. He discusses how most of the cargo passing through the port originates from much further inland, far beyond Saint John or the province. He describes their focus on 'Food Grade Products' and how there is an opportunity for value-added processing close to Port Saint John. He mentions specifically french fries with McCain and Cavendish, although I am not sure if that is a potential opportunity for the industrial park or an analogy. Adding this value-added processing makes the port far more 'sticky', making it more challenging to switch to alternative ports.

He also mentioned more than once that McAdam is interested in having some form of manufacturing or value-added processing, thanks to its access to the rail line. I won't hold my breath on that one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1074  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2025, 4:42 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by bingun View Post
During tonight's council meeting regarding the Lorneville industrial rezoning, the CEO of Port Saint John spoke in favour and answered a few questions from councillors. It is worth listening to for those interested in the port.

https://www.youtube.com/live/fYt36jYpnhI?si=AK5i_bGulLOk_Xh2&t=6198

To give Craig credit, he is very articulate and a natural speaker. He discusses how most of the cargo passing through the port originates from much further inland, far beyond Saint John or the province. He describes their focus on 'Food Grade Products' and how there is an opportunity for value-added processing close to Port Saint John. He mentions specifically french fries with McCain and Cavendish, although I am not sure if that is a potential opportunity for the industrial park or an analogy. Adding this value-added processing makes the port far more 'sticky', making it more challenging to switch to alternative ports.

He also mentioned more than once that McAdam is interested in having some form of manufacturing or value-added processing, thanks to its access to the rail line. I won't hold my breath on that one.
Thanks for the time stamp. Just watched. I thought his answer to the final question was especially interesting. . The Port is fortunate that he was selected as CEO, as he's clearly very passionate about his job, and his youth and enthusiasm is breath of fresh air compared to the average boomer or older gen x'ers that often gets that type of high profile job.

He was well spoken and gave a good overview of this type of opportunity that exists here for synergy between the port and the Lorneville industrial park expansion, and just how commonplace this type of operation is for other ports. His focus on attracting more value added cargo sounds like a very good strategy for the port. Also for the people of Lorneville, warehouses and french fry manufacturing sure sounds a lot less daunting than the rumours of battery plants, or a hydrogen ammonia processing facilities.

I'm glad he made it clear the port is running out of room and the need for sustained expansion, as there's certainly a lot of opportunities for expansion in both the inner harbour, and outer harbour. This gave councillors a perfect opportunity to ask him about a question about what sort of future opportunities for further port expansion projects in the inner harbour, like that derelict pier on the west side, like the former sugar refinery site, or even more related to the meeting agenda, if there exists an opportunity for a deep water in Lorneville to to enhance the port's container operations.

They might not have gotten a clear answer, but they might have gotten a slightly better idea of what is to come.


Also, while the PM has recently indicated that some provincial leaders might need to limit their expectations when it comes to how much federal funding will be provided for projects of national interest, I think when it comes to Port Saint John, it should be safe to assume the federal government will continue be the main investor and funding stream for future expansion and developments at Port Saint John.

Another hypothetical question that would have been interesting to ask regarding the possibility for a deepwater water port at Lorneville, would be if that coastal parcel of land in the proposed expansion plans would be purchased by federal government, or would it be leased by Port Saint John and its operator?

Definitely worth watching this clip, and sounds like there's a lot of reason to be positive for synergy between the port and this Lorneville industrial park expansion.

Last edited by EnvisionSaintJohn; Jun 17, 2025 at 4:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1075  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2025, 10:45 AM
J81 J81 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
Hopefully Port Saint John’s growth doesn't need to come entirely at the expense of the Port of Halifax. I don’t think it has so far, but it’s logical that shipping companies would chose Saint John over Halifax, when SJ is closer to bigger markets.

I expect the Port of Halifax will see lots of opportunities for growth if Canada rises up to the occasion and realizes the Prime Minister’s ambitions to increase our trading relationships with Europe.

Markets being closer distance wise doesnt really matter. Transit times is what matters and SJ is a half to full days sail further than Halifax from EU and ME which means a ship can dock in Halifax and its containers be on a train headed west before the same ship would have arrived in SJ.

I think a lot of SJs growth could come locally. There is a lot of truck traffic running containers from NB and PEI into Halifax which is a PIA and i think theres an opportunity for SJ to steal a good portion of that. Paper from Nackawic should in theory be put on ships in SJ and not Halifax.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1076  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2025, 11:26 AM
cdnguys cdnguys is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,380
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1077  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2025, 3:24 PM
Pugsley Pugsley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 594
I could see the rail congestion in Halifax being a major reason for the drop in shipments. I don't have any data, just observations - where two summers ago I went to the outdoor restaurant in Bedford which requires you to cross the rail tracks. The train that was leaving port with cargo on that one line in and out was long and blocked access to/from the restaurant for at least 30 minutes.

I wonder if this is a major factor?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1078  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2025, 7:32 PM
cdnguys cdnguys is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugsley View Post
I could see the rail congestion in Halifax being a major reason for the drop in shipments. I don't have any data, just observations - where two summers ago I went to the outdoor restaurant in Bedford which requires you to cross the rail tracks. The train that was leaving port with cargo on that one line in and out was long and blocked access to/from the restaurant for at least 30 minutes.

I wonder if this is a major factor?
If you worked in risk management, what would you think of this?

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1079  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2025, 10:01 PM
JakeNB JakeNB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Saint John
Posts: 196
A Brent Harris post on Facebook-seems he is against development of the Port:
“We can't keep shipping cheap goods around the planet and taking advantage of weak labour laws and environmental regulations over seas and call it fair. If we build what we need closer to home we prevent continued emissions associated with distribution, we achieve higher standard of labour laws and protections, and we become a more resilient community. If we don't do this, we stay vulnerable and hypocritical in my opinion. The cost of global shipping and supply chains is unbearable for our planet and the people are not voting to return to a more agrarian society or else the Green party would be far better represented.”
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1080  
Old Posted Jun 17, 2025, 11:07 PM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is online now
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,945
Quote:
Originally Posted by JakeNB View Post
A Brent Harris post on Facebook-seems he is against development of the Port:
“We can't keep shipping cheap goods around the planet and taking advantage of weak labour laws and environmental regulations over seas and call it fair. If we build what we need closer to home we prevent continued emissions associated with distribution, we achieve higher standard of labour laws and protections, and we become a more resilient community. If we don't do this, we stay vulnerable and hypocritical in my opinion. The cost of global shipping and supply chains is unbearable for our planet and the people are not voting to return to a more agrarian society or else the Green party would be far better represented.”
He just loves the sound of his own voice, even if what he is saying is absolute nonsense, which this is. Further developing the port is central to sustaining economic growth in Saint John.

Worst councillor in the city, period.
__________________
Peace and Athabasca and Coppermine and Slave, And Yukon and Mackenzie—the highroads of the brave. Saskatchewan, Assiniboine, the Bow and the Qu'Appelle, And many a prairie river whose name is like a spell. They rumor through the twilight at the edge of the unknown, "There's a message waiting for you, and a kingdom all your own. — Bliss Carman
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.