Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadandMarket
Ugliest building in the city? That's a bit of a stretch. They used real brick and it replaced an 1 floor warehouse and vacant lot. The Mark? The Lincoln's ugly metal panels? Home2 Suites suburban stucco? The Standard at 30th and Walnut? Both of the new buildings at 2nd and Poplar? Ugliest building in the city is a little harsh.
It's not the looks holding it back from selling, it's the lack of parking like you mentioned.
|
I hear you. I guess context is important in my assessment. The proposals that were submarined by the "Bridge Coalition" (the residents of The Bridge that opposed two awesome projects because it obstructed a few floors facing south) were both vastly superior and would have been amazing for the area.
Purple is right. Up close, it's even more egregious. The south and west sides are entirely suburban vinyl siding that looks horrific. Race street has a small residential entrance and two arched plastic barn doors that look like they stripped them off a prefab shed at Home depot. 2nd Street is no better. There's a tiny "retail space" that no one in their right mind would ever rent. So those windows are covered in construction paper that should be considered permanent.
It's not objectively the worst building in the city but for this location, taken with what could have been, it could be the worst execution of any plot of land in the city. I'll stand by that.