HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1461  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 2:35 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,786
Encouraging, but I hope the change doesn't trigger the approval process all over again. Waguespack would probably schedule more than a dozen community meetings...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1462  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 5:51 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,023
^ Lakeshore East owners/residents actually have to pay back the loan for the infrastructure over like 50 years. Something similar could be done at LY or 78, but much better to politik under you can get some freebies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1463  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 6:26 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by west-town-brad View Post
^ Lakeshore East owners/residents actually have to pay back the loan for the infrastructure over like 50 years. Something similar could be done at LY or 78, but much better to politik under you can get some freebies.
here is a link to the text of the bond: http://www.neweastside.org/LSEassessment.html

same could be done for the 78 or LY as I mentioned.... with very little cost to general taxpayers for the needed infrastructure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1464  
Old Posted May 11, 2025, 3:05 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,038
Thanks for sharing, I did not know about this!

I wonder if JDL goes this route with their chunk of Lincoln Yards, and get city approvals to build a mid rise residential district.

I really think that scale paired with some walkable spaces becomes a big hit, and instantly one of the more desirable neighborhoods to live in in the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1465  
Old Posted May 14, 2025, 9:05 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,108
As the Northern portion goes, so does the Southern portion....

https://www.chicagobusiness.com/comm...-news-20250514

I'm pretty happy to see JDL poised to take over the entire project. Given their track record with other Chicago developments, my optimism for this land eventually getting built out has risen now. I suspect JDL will take the normal piecemeal approach with one building at a time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1466  
Old Posted May 14, 2025, 10:44 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,161
Yeah definitely exciting ^

Sterling Bay has really seen a fall from grace these past few years. Not only do they lose the southern part of the site but it also turns out that Kayne Anderson (A potential partner sterling bay was seeking) is now working with JDL instead. What a story.
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1467  
Old Posted May 14, 2025, 10:48 PM
mh777 mh777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: River North
Posts: 233
Finally... a good developer is involved with this project. Sterling Bay is not the same company they use to be. I've heard they've taken an absolute bath on some of their West Loop projects, let alone this one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1468  
Old Posted May 14, 2025, 11:45 PM
west-town-brad west-town-brad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,023
What leverage gives (Fulton Market) it takes away (Lincoln Yards).

Hopefully with JDL we can expect this to be mostly residential district and associated amenities with a mix of density and to merge Lincoln Park and Bucktown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1469  
Old Posted May 15, 2025, 4:25 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,849
Yeah, agreed that residential is the way to go. The project as planned is not feasible in this market. Outside of small boutique office buildings, it's unlikely that the near future will be seeing much office in the developmental pipeline, outside the odd tower or two in Fulton Market. WFH has been absolutely crushing office space demand.

Making this project primarily residential with retail is the way to go. I would love for JDL to go with more high rises, but short of some sort of dedicated transit planning (BRT or rail), I don't think the area's infrastructure could handle that much density. We might see a more low and mid rise proposals from JDL, unless they work with the city on some very expensive transportation upgrades; the previously mentioned transit, fixing the Courtland/Ashland/Armitage clusterf*ck, dedicated bus lanes on Ashland, etc.
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1470  
Old Posted May 15, 2025, 5:16 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
Making this project primarily residential with retail is the way to go. I would love for JDL to go with more high rises, but short of some sort of dedicated transit planning (BRT or rail), I don't think the area's infrastructure could handle that much density. We might see a more low and mid rise proposals from JDL, unless they work with the city on some very expensive transportation upgrades; the previously mentioned transit, fixing the Courtland/Ashland/Armitage clusterf*ck, dedicated bus lanes on Ashland, etc.
+1 on this.

As much as I would love to see a cluster of highrises go here, I'm not holding my breath. If it means go for broke on a super dense mega project here versus a more guaranteed fill project that fills in old industrial land along the river to connect two major neighborhoods - The choice is easy.

With that said - JDL has proven themselves to get major things off the ground, so if they think they can go big and help fund infrastructure - By all means, I'm down for that too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1471  
Old Posted May 15, 2025, 7:00 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
With that said - JDL has proven themselves to get major things off the ground, so if they think they can go big and help fund infrastructure - By all means, I'm down for that too.
I certainly hope so. There are plenty of places to build 3-6 story residential buildings all throughout the city. Creating a new high rise neighborhood doesn't come easy, and brownfields like this (as well as the 78) are the best option for that to happen. LSE could not have been the great success that it was without the significant infrastructure investment it required.
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1472  
Old Posted May 16, 2025, 3:49 AM
Toasty Joe Toasty Joe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Wicker Park, Chicago, IL
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
I certainly hope so. There are plenty of places to build 3-6 story residential buildings all throughout the city. Creating a new high rise neighborhood doesn't come easy, and brownfields like this (as well as the 78) are the best option for that to happen. LSE could not have been the great success that it was without the significant infrastructure investment it required.
Eh I'm not typically a fan of new highrise neighborhoods. They tend to look soulless since the architecture is all from the same decade with similar shapes/materials (see Hudson Yards). To my knowledge, JDL hasn't done a highrise that's not primarily a glass curtain wall - despite how well they executed One Chicago.

LSE isn't my favorite collection of buildings, but it actually works better than other new highrise neighborhoods because the older towers nearby (Prudential, AON, Harbor Point) blend into it, allowing the architecture to span 60+ years.

You can kinda see this in our Loop-adjacent neighorhoods too:
- 1990s/2000s - River North beige + blank parking podia
- 2000s/2010s - South Loop glassy towers
- 2010s/2020s - West Loop dark industrial chic
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1473  
Old Posted May 16, 2025, 1:32 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,038
Yeah I'd be hoping for more 7-12 story mid rise scale, like Printers Row. There's always felt like a dearth of that scale here, but it gives you a lot of the benefits of density without some of the downsides of newly built high rise neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1474  
Old Posted May 16, 2025, 2:03 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,786
I wonder if JDL is considering renaming/rebranding the site once they gain control? "Lincoln Yards" is vey much associated with SB and various controversies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1475  
Old Posted May 16, 2025, 4:45 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,161
To me yeah height doesn’t matter.

The two main priorities should be.

1. Increasing the connectivity between Lincoln park/Lakeview to Bucktown/Wicker park.

2. Activating all that River front property to be accessible/entertaining to the public.
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1476  
Old Posted May 16, 2025, 9:55 PM
iguy iguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Posts: 64
Fingers crossed for “One Lincoln Park” supertall.

Joking, joking (mostly).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1477  
Old Posted May 17, 2025, 1:10 AM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,696
Waugespack spoke with ABC 7, he expects a new plan by the end of the summer and he personally wants JDL to consider a Chicago Fire stadium on the site.

https://abc7chicago.com/post/chicago...fell/16429387/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1478  
Old Posted May 18, 2025, 2:45 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 652
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchymunch View Post
To me yeah height doesn’t matter.

The two main priorities should be.

1. Increasing the connectivity between Lincoln park/Lakeview to Bucktown/Wicker park.

2. Activating all that River front property to be accessible/entertaining to the public.
If this ends up effectively a residential development (likely), how active is the riverfront likely to be? Not having all those office workers, reduces some of the need for commercial space as well as lunch-time gathering spots. The residential-driven riverwalks I have seen tend to have appeal to the locals with strollers, walking dogs, etc. Pleasant, but not geared to entertainment nor attracting outsiders
Has JDL done anything along the river?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1479  
Old Posted May 18, 2025, 6:11 PM
jpIllInoIs's Avatar
jpIllInoIs jpIllInoIs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Waugespack spoke with ABC 7, he expects a new plan by the end of the summer and he personally wants JDL to consider a Chicago Fire stadium on the site.

https://abc7chicago.com/post/chicago...fell/16429387/
No to the stadium! Besides the many traffic issues I'd rather see the Fire in the new "scaled down-Historically correct- Soldier Field" that would accommodate concerts but open the views to the Loop skyline. Ive seen old renders that flipped the orientation of the soccer pitch to an East/West alignment with the colonnades acting as End Posts and the south side of the stadium being built up for the largest seating capacity with sky boxes and the North side being lower capacity but allowing Museum campus and Grant Park views.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1480  
Old Posted May 18, 2025, 9:06 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by VKChaz View Post
If this ends up effectively a residential development (likely), how active is the riverfront likely to be? Not having all those office workers, reduces some of the need for commercial space as well as lunch-time gathering spots. The residential-driven riverwalks I have seen tend to have appeal to the locals with strollers, walking dogs, etc. Pleasant, but not geared to entertainment nor attracting outsiders
Has JDL done anything along the river?
Residential vs. Office would make no difference in how active the riverfront is or not imo. This is 100+ acres of riverfront property wedged between two of Chicago's most affluent neighborhoods. It has all the potential to be just as popular as the River Walk downtown, 606, or the lakefront.

Again, it's about execution. First, access and infrastructure need to be improved in the area. Then, the riverwalk itself needs to be accessible and have things to do, like bars, restaurants, shops, etc.

As they say... if you build it, people will come.
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > General Development
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:15 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.