HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


View Poll Results: Should Portage and Main be open for pedestrian traffic?
Yes 113 92.62%
No 9 7.38%
Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1801  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 11:02 PM
michelleb michelleb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 191
I get such sun blindness off the ultra reflective white sidewalks. I don't remember having that problem in other cities.

I wish the city would stop putting in that "decorative" banding. The bricks end up shifting around when the sand/gravel washes away. There's a spot on Donald south of York that developed an ankle-twisting strip within a year of being built that I have to avoid every day, and the city never fixed it when they were doing spot fixes under contract last year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1802  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 11:33 PM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg|MB
Posts: 2,321
the worst thing with the decorative banding is that on some streets it's painted on.. like on academy rd LOL but then no missing bricks at least.
__________________
instagram: @jeff_vernaus
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1803  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 11:34 PM
FactaNV FactaNV is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2023
Posts: 2,363
In all fairness, any decoration would come with the transit station, should they have built it all at the same time? Yes. But is it coming despite that? Also yes. (At least let's hope so).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1804  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 11:38 PM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winnipeg|MB
Posts: 2,321
well hopefully carney rewards winnipeg with voting mostly red with heaps of federal transit funds! otherwise we gonna get used to this intersection as-is for a decade or two for sure.
__________________
instagram: @jeff_vernaus
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1805  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 2:20 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,622
Man it does NOT take long for people to take a victory and turn it into an unmitigated disaster. The sidewalks suck! Gillingham sucks! Everything sucks! The "keep it closed" faction must be loving this.
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1806  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 5:12 PM
Glenn99 Glenn99 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by pspeid View Post
Man it does NOT take long for people to take a victory and turn it into an unmitigated disaster. The sidewalks suck! Gillingham sucks! Everything sucks! The "keep it closed" faction must be loving this.
No kidding!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1807  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 5:24 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by pspeid View Post
Man it does NOT take long for people to take a victory and turn it into an unmitigated disaster. The sidewalks suck! Gillingham sucks! Everything sucks! The "keep it closed" faction must be loving this.
no im saying shame we did this cheaping out thats all as the underground is an asset we need to keep going as well
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1808  
Old Posted May 10, 2025, 5:55 PM
pspeid's Avatar
pspeid pspeid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
no im saying shame we did this cheaping out thats all as the underground is an asset we need to keep going as well
But isn't calling this opening of P & M a "cheap out" just another way to belittle what is essentially a positive development? I know this is an opinion forum and people are free to blue sky different ideas, but I think we have to keep a sense of perspective as well. For many of us opening P & M is a positive step in the regrowth of downtown. Improved aesthetics are desirable, but they can be added later. It's great to dream big, but P & M is hardly the only expense the city has to deal with. I think it's incredibly short-sighted to start slagging Gillingham (other posters, not you) for not providing something flashier at P & M when he's been the only mayor to actually get the job done and open the intersection. We often bemoan the lack of vision in our civic leaders. I wonder how many people want to do something daring or original when their own supporters eventually turn on them?
__________________
"Opinion is really the lowest form of intelligence"-Bill Bullard

"Naysayers are always predicting the present"-Anon.

"Rudeness is the weak man's imitation of strength"-Eric Hoffer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1809  
Old Posted May 12, 2025, 1:11 AM
pegster pegster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 258
^ Agreed.

Gillingham has taken the "open or closed" debate off the table, finally. And the repairs look pretty handsome, if basic, to me. I don't think we should spend lots of time and money debating making it a grand plaza for people before the people have even come back.

Once we get some movement on the downtown transit corridor, where P&M will be a major interchange, we can spiff it it up. But for now, just get it open. The people make the place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1810  
Old Posted May 12, 2025, 2:36 AM
Mr Tall Forehead's Avatar
Mr Tall Forehead Mr Tall Forehead is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 879
^ ditto to both the above.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1811  
Old Posted May 12, 2025, 5:16 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 15,038
the most interesting part of this work is that two lanes were removed from every side of the intersection and traffic slowed for about a month and then it just figured itself out....the capacity was cut in half and congestion is back to normal...this should be a lesson for going forward....we have real world proof that it doesn't have to be that car dominant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1812  
Old Posted May 12, 2025, 7:09 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,318
100000%.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1813  
Old Posted May 12, 2025, 9:28 PM
Kresimir Kresimir is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2025
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by trueviking View Post
the most interesting part of this work is that two lanes were removed from every side of the intersection and traffic slowed for about a month and then it just figured itself out....the capacity was cut in half and congestion is back to normal...this should be a lesson for going forward....we have real world proof that it doesn't have to be that car dominant.
This is going to need to be remembered when people inevitability flip at the idea of losing lanes whenever we get around to the portage section of BRT
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1814  
Old Posted May 13, 2025, 12:05 AM
EndIt EndIt is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by pspeid View Post
But isn't calling this opening of P & M a "cheap out" just another way to belittle what is essentially a positive development? I know this is an opinion forum and people are free to blue sky different ideas, but I think we have to keep a sense of perspective as well. For many of us opening P & M is a positive step in the regrowth of downtown. Improved aesthetics are desirable, but they can be added later. It's great to dream big, but P & M is hardly the only expense the city has to deal with. I think it's incredibly short-sighted to start slagging Gillingham (other posters, not you) for not providing something flashier at P & M when he's been the only mayor to actually get the job done and open the intersection. We often bemoan the lack of vision in our civic leaders. I wonder how many people want to do something daring or original when their own supporters eventually turn on them?
I think you're giving Gillingham a little too much credit. Opening P&M happened because it was cheaper than repairing the concourse. Its good that it happened, but if the concourse was still in good enough shape there's little so suggest that Gillingham wouldn't have kept the issue stuck firmly in feasability study hell.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1815  
Old Posted May 13, 2025, 2:15 AM
The Jabroni's Avatar
The Jabroni The Jabroni is offline
Go kicky fast, okay!
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Winnipeg, Donut Dominion
Posts: 3,365
Up until now, this intersection is STILL a contentious issue among some of you.

"Should have kept it closed!"

"It's too ugly!"

"Traffic was the same!"

"My back hurts!"

Jeeze people, get a grip and move on already!!

The intersection is fine and adequate. No need to make it all pretty in one shot. All of that takes time and needs further planning. The city is on a deadline and they intended to meet that, even if it means the aesthetics are the same as every other intersection in this city!

Gotta get it functioning first. Form will come after.
__________________
Back then, I used to be indecisive.

Now, I'm not so sure.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1816  
Old Posted May 13, 2025, 3:09 AM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,318
The concrete is too white?? Wtf. P&M got the standard city kit for sidewalks. The banding is for people with disabilities ie: blindness. Get a grip.

This was intended to be the quick fix for the transit plan implementation. Ended up costing a pretty penny as only one contractor bid on the work.

The fancy streetscaping would happen whenever the BRT stuff gets done. And that preliminary design is supposed to happen now in 2026.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1817  
Old Posted May 13, 2025, 3:22 AM
Mr Tall Forehead's Avatar
Mr Tall Forehead Mr Tall Forehead is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 879
Quote:
Originally Posted by EndIt View Post
I think you're giving Gillingham a little too much credit. Opening P&M happened because it was cheaper than repairing the concourse. Its good that it happened, but if the concourse was still in good enough shape there's little so suggest that Gillingham wouldn't have kept the issue stuck firmly in feasability study hell.
Or…imagine this…that’s how the Mayor and his comms team spun the story so that the masses of penny pinching boomers that voted no wouldn’t start griping about traffic chaos?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1818  
Old Posted May 23, 2025, 3:52 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 7,935
Update on Portage and Main: Video

MD Steele Construction
Portage & Main… Nearing Completion
After 2.5 months of steady progress, we’re entering the final stages at one of Winnipeg’s busiest intersections. With the hoarding now removed, each corner of Portage & Main is taking shape.

Northwest Corner: Sidewalks are largely complete. With hoarding gone, we’ll remove the remaining concourse concrete, complete waterproofing, and install over 25 protective bollards.

Southwest Corner: Work is underway to tie into the existing building. Once waterproofing is complete, paving stones will be placed right up to the structure.

Southeast Corner: Major structural concrete work is finished. Now, we’re focused on waterproofing and rebuilding sidewalks.

Northeast Corner: Colored concrete inserts were matched to the Richardson Concourse. Final tie-ins and sidewalk restoration are close to complete.

We’ve also constructed new footings and conduit systems for street lighting and traffic signal infrastructure, including multiple 6-foot excavations.
This has been a challenging but exciting project. We appreciate the continued support from the public and project partners alike.
__________________
Winnipeg Act II - April 2024

Winnipeg Developments

In The Future Every Building Will Be World-Famous For Fifteen Minutes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1819  
Old Posted May 23, 2025, 4:17 PM
ColdRain&Snow's Avatar
ColdRain&Snow ColdRain&Snow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,562
Thanks for the update. Exciting to see the work progressing. Hopefully they are still planning to have the intersection open by Canada Day.
__________________
"Build baby build."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1820  
Old Posted May 25, 2025, 4:17 PM
pegster pegster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Posts: 258
Exclamation

Any chance they are going to redo the medians as part of this? The new sidewalks look great but the medians are in a real sorry state.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:07 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.