HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #12081  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2025, 3:30 AM
Forrester1998 Forrester1998 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsunsurfer View Post
Interesting, I always thought the DRC was the first stop even for rezoning?
Right, the development entitlements always go through DRC and then the full council but there's a number of entitlements that the developer must procure before they file for building permits:

GPA - General Plan Amendment (If development does not match zoning listed in most recent general plan, requires supermajority of council for approval, not required for this project)
Rezoning - Required if development does not match current zoning, often this is required to bring the zoning in line with the general plan because the passage of the general plan itself does not change the zoning.
PAD - Planned Area Development, my understanding is that this establishes the broad guidelines for a development (list of included parcels, allowed density, parking requirements, building height, unit types, etc) would welcome more thorough explanation from anybody who has a better understanding.
DPR - Development Plan Review, this is the finer detailed description of the project upon which building permits applications etc will be based.

So basically in December this project did the rezone and PAD applications because they were trying to get a land sale through by the end of the year and sometimes establishing the PAD is prerequisite to that, but they werent ready for the DPR so they are just getting that through now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12082  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2025, 2:52 PM
locolife locolife is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 674
Quote:
Originally Posted by muertecaza View Post
Sounds like the House of Tricks development has the inside track with city council over the historic preservation board's objections:

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/loc...tricks-historic-church-site/82899665007/
I was worried they'd try to demo the HOT building, glad to hear that's not the plan. Also, the building looks good, less "value engineered" then most. Seems like a solid all-around plan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12083  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2025, 2:52 PM
locolife locolife is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 674
Quote:
Originally Posted by builder03 View Post
If you think about it, the side of the building shown in the render will be covered up by the building on the corner of 7th and College, whenever that gets built. I believe the finishes on the north/south side of the building look a little nicer than the east elevation shown in the render. Same deal with the existing Atmosphere tower, the east side of the building is pretty bland. I believe these were designed with the expectation of neighboring towers being built in the future.
That is a very good point.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12084  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2025, 7:21 PM
azsunsurfer azsunsurfer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,470
The Watson Flowers building was finally demolished to make way for that homeless shelter
__________________
No cap son!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12085  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2025, 9:17 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is offline
reasonably smart guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsunsurfer View Post
The Watson Flowers building was finally demolished to make way for that homeless shelter
more affordable housing = fewer homeless shelters
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12086  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2025, 1:14 AM
azsunsurfer azsunsurfer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,470
If it was up to me I would have preserved that building maybe as a museum vs. the homeless shelter. I wonder if the "world's first car-free subdivision" will eventually have to fortress it up between this and the motel they converted to homeless housing next door.
__________________
No cap son!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12087  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2025, 2:27 AM
exit2lef exit2lef is offline
reasonably smart guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsunsurfer View Post
If it was up to me I would have preserved that building maybe as a museum vs. the homeless shelter. I wonder if the "world's first car-free subdivision" will eventually have to fortress it up between this and the motel they converted to homeless housing next door.
Sue's Espacio (next door to Culdesac) is a small shelter with 40 rooms. The development planned for the Watson Flowers site is affordable housing.

homeless shelter ≠ affordable housing

As stated before, more affordable housing = fewer homeless shelters
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12088  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2025, 4:01 PM
MiEncanto MiEncanto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 464
The only clear market connection is

more housing = more affordable housing

More affordable housing = less need for transitional housing, supportive housing, etc.

It's difficult to argue that boosting subsidized apartments is going to directly link to a decrease in emergency shelters like what we have at the HSC.

The handful of "affordable housing" units that get built each year are a drop in the ocean. The 10% set aside for "workforce housing" in the newest incentive apartment tower is a joke. These don't have any impact on what's going on at homeless shelters.

We should be making it easier to build housing at all levels, whether it's todays luxury apartments (affordable housing in 20 years!), owner occupied middle housing like condos, townhomes, duplexes, triplexes, etc. And even traditional owner occupied single family helps with affordable apartments because transitioning families who want to move out are currently trapped.

I just saw an article today that the NIMBYs in the historic hoods are pissed people may build middle housing near their properties. This is the behavior that hurts housing. Meanwhile these turds pay half the property taxes as everyone else because of their incentive program. I know they didn't make the law but it grinds my gears that those wealthy enough to live in Palmcroft would have the nerve to pay less in taxes and shut down housing efforts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12089  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2025, 5:15 PM
Forrester1998 Forrester1998 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 151
Lol, 173 people arrested at the Tempe Tavern for underage drinking during a raid. Can you even actually fit 173 total customers into the Tempe Tavern?

https://ktar.com/arizona-news/173-people-arrested-tempe-underage/5699219/

This news is mostly unrelated to the subject of this thread EXCEPT it's an opportunity to highlight that the NE corner of Apache and McClintock is currently a severely underutilized piece of land that currently does not have any kind of planned development (the SE corner of course has Tempe Metro apartments and the SW/NW corners both have entitled projects though they haven't applied for any build permits or anything yet). The current land uses on the NE corner are a smoke shop, Tempe Tavern (see above ^^), the 2 story Paradise Inn motel, and what I think is a shuttered former sheet metal distributor.

Also, before it was sold and demo'd for the 955 E. University high rise project, Devil's Advocate had a bit of a reputation as an underage drinking bar (I don't have first hand experience w/ that but had heard that both online and from friends during college) and I wonder if some of those people got diverted to Tempe Tavern and that's why suddenly there's complaints.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12090  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2025, 3:57 PM
azsunsurfer azsunsurfer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,470
__________________
No cap son!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12091  
Old Posted May 1, 2025, 4:42 PM
azsunsurfer azsunsurfer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,470
What's that tower in the background of the new rendering, "903 S Terrace Rd??"

https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2025/05/01/two-tempe-towers-student-housing-near-asu.html
__________________
No cap son!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12092  
Old Posted May 1, 2025, 5:22 PM
Forrester1998 Forrester1998 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsunsurfer View Post
What's that tower in the background of the new rendering, "903 S Terrace Rd??"

https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2025/05/01/two-tempe-towers-student-housing-near-asu.html
That's an older proposed project that got its entitlements around ~2017 I think (I could be wrong) I honestly assumed their entitlements had lapsed but yeah it was approved for 22 stories and would be student housing (I forgot the # of units). It was mentioned a lot during the Leo Tempe rezoning request as part of the justification for the height (aka matches surrounding projects) and it seems like the city would still support the project if it ever got back on its feet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12093  
Old Posted May 1, 2025, 5:24 PM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsunsurfer View Post
What's that tower in the background of the new rendering, "903 S Terrace Rd??"

https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2025/05/01/two-tempe-towers-student-housing-near-asu.html
Wasn't this supposed to be another X Tempe project or something?

Additional renderings of The Leo from link above:








Last edited by ASU Diablo; May 1, 2025 at 6:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12094  
Old Posted May 7, 2025, 5:45 PM
azsunsurfer azsunsurfer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,470
https://tempe.hylandcloud.com/Agendaonli...ket&itemId=0&publishId=0&isSection=false

If you scroll down you'll see the new Marshall phase and honestly it looks better than the one they are putting up on the Apache side!
__________________
No cap son!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12095  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 9:27 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsunsurfer View Post
https://tempe.hylandcloud.com/Agendaonli...ket&itemId=0&publishId=0&isSection=false

If you scroll down you'll see the new Marshall phase and honestly it looks better than the one they are putting up on the Apache side!
Agreed, I like the corrugated metal.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12096  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 2:00 AM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA/AZ Nomad
Posts: 7,433
Man, I didn't think they'd go for that kind of height on Spence without having property frontage on Apache. We'll see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12097  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 6:49 AM
Raymie Raymie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 9
Heard today that Pita Jungle at University and Mill is closing mid-month and apparently looking for a new location nearby due to high rent. Conveniently, it's been 10 years since their last move, which tells me that they had a reasonable lease and given all the development or changing traffic patterns it's been sent into the stratosphere. Or that the owner is anxious to turn over that corner lot for redevelopment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12098  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 12:20 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is offline
reasonably smart guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymie View Post
Heard today that Pita Jungle at University and Mill is closing mid-month and apparently looking for a new location nearby due to high rent. Conveniently, it's been 10 years since their last move, which tells me that they had a reasonable lease and given all the development or changing traffic patterns it's been sent into the stratosphere. Or that the owner is anxious to turn over that corner lot for redevelopment.
It's hard to believe it has been a decade. I'm still nostalgic for the restaurant's original location at Apache and Dorsey. That was their sole restaurant in the mid-90s before they became a chain. It would be nice to see taller, denser development at that corner, ideally involving the Jack in the Box site just north of Pita Jungle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12099  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 4:31 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
It's hard to believe it has been a decade. I'm still nostalgic for the restaurant's original location at Apache and Dorsey. That was their sole restaurant in the mid-90s before they became a chain. It would be nice to see taller, denser development at that corner, ideally involving the Jack in the Box site just north of Pita Jungle.
There was nothing quite like a Stinkweeds/Pita Jungle weekend run.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12100  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 7:34 PM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
Skyriser
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CA/AZ Nomad
Posts: 7,433
I was poking around and I noticed that the Marshall Phase I bought that hotel for $10 million/acre.

To put that into perspective, the 3 story apartments next door only built in 1987 and are perfectly serviceable could sell for double the 2020 purchase price and redevelopment might still pencil out.

I was under the impression that newer structures like that would be around for a while but that's not necessarily the case. Land seems to really be that valuable in North Tempe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:44 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.