HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #15881  
Old Posted May 7, 2025, 11:56 AM
dhottawa729's Avatar
dhottawa729 dhottawa729 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 242
I would much rather prefer the Lantic sugar site to be a 4-storey stacked townhouse community, with higher density focused in the core of Uptown. With this much housing inventory being proposed, the demand for a prominent residential tower in the core might not be there again for quite a long time. I forget how many units are proposed for Lantic, but if the demand is there, I don’t know why 99 King didn’t go much taller. Imagine being tall enough to be above the fog. Maybe 30 stories would do it!

I also wonder if there is even a market for this much residential Uptown because Phase 2 of the Harbourfront Residences across from the cruise ship terminal still hasn’t happened, and now we have Fundy Quay and 99 King underway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15882  
Old Posted May 7, 2025, 12:22 PM
Pugsley Pugsley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
I've always felt that Saint John, NB and Portland, ME have a lot of aesthetic and historical similarities... I think a similarly ambitious project could be a great addition to the Saint John skyline.
I don't disagree that there are some similarities aesthetically between the two cities, but there are some pretty significant differences allowing it to support a development like this.

First, Portland is decades ahead of Saint John when it comes to their infill developments - but this has taken time and LOTS of NIMBY-ism. We all poo poo the heritage by-laws in Saint John, but Portland is a prime example of how being strict can eventually pay off. Similar to my argument before...Uptown Saint John will grow UP when it is finished filling OUT in a proper manner. The past 15 years have been a boom in Portland for in-fill apartments, restoring older warehouses, and low-rise structures. They've added more draws for people to live downtown - like a Whole Foods and Trader Joe's. Not to mention it is consistently rated as one of the hottest up and coming culinary destinations in America. However, they've refused to compromise on heritage and design rules for decades - to preserve the general aesthetic of the old port. Every in-fill is carefully evaluated to make sure it matches the historic port feel. It meant a much slower up-ramp but eventually, it paid off. Basically, they took the walk, crawl, run approach to development and now it is on fire as people want to live there.

Second, they have a much larger population than Saint John. The Portland–Lewiston–South Portland Combined Statistical Area is roughly 680K population-wise, which is more akin to Halifax, if not larger when you add it's proximity to Greater Boston.

So while it is a nice building, I once again argue that there is no point dreaming about these towers in Uptown until we solve the infill and desirability formula. That said, I'd argue that the slower pace and attention to detail taken by Portland early on could make Saint John equally as prosperous one day..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15883  
Old Posted May 7, 2025, 12:40 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 1,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhottawa729 View Post
I would much rather prefer the Lantic sugar site to be a 4-storey stacked townhouse community, with higher density focused in the core of Uptown. With this much housing inventory being proposed, the demand for a prominent residential tower in the core might not be there again for quite a long time. I forget how many units are proposed for Lantic, but if the demand is there, I don’t know why 99 King didn’t go much taller. Imagine being tall enough to be above the fog. Maybe 30 stories would do it!

I also wonder if there is even a market for this much residential Uptown because Phase 2 of the Harbourfront Residences across from the cruise ship terminal still hasn’t happened, and now we have Fundy Quay and 99 King underway.
Existing Harbourfront building is VERY cramped and has, IIRC, high turnover.

The southwestern third/half of the Lantic Sugar site (NOT Lafford's lot) is teak pilings and crumbling concrete. I used to fish down there before it turned into a homeless encampment. Water splashes up through holes in the ground at high tide!

You would have to do serious, beyond Fundy Quay level, civil engineering work to build anything. I don't think townhouses would justify it. Maybe it's more stable to the eastern, narrow end of the site, but I dunno.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15884  
Old Posted May 7, 2025, 12:42 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 1,992
Approving single-egress six-storey builds would goose infill massively.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15885  
Old Posted May 7, 2025, 12:48 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhottawa729 View Post
I would much rather prefer the Lantic sugar site to be a 4-storey stacked townhouse community, with higher density focused in the core of Uptown. With this much housing inventory being proposed, the demand for a prominent residential tower in the core might not be there again for quite a long time. I forget how many units are proposed for Lantic, but if the demand is there, I don’t know why 99 King didn’t go much taller. Imagine being tall enough to be above the fog. Maybe 30 stories would do it!

I also wonder if there is even a market for this much residential Uptown because Phase 2 of the Harbourfront Residences across from the cruise ship terminal still hasn’t happened, and now we have Fundy Quay and 99 King underway.
I've heard a couple of theories to explain the lack of success of the Harbourfront Residences project. One was simply that condos don't sell in SJ.

The other was more nuanced and basically said that while the exterior was well done the size and the quality of the finish and features in the units themselves just wasn't up to scratch. I've never been in one but looking at realtor listings they seem "OK" but somewhat ordinary and uninspired. What people will accept in a rental isn't necessarily good enough when people are buying.

York Point and Robertson's Wharf seemed to do OK (and they seem to sell when they come on the resale market) so maybe it's the latter.

As to why 99 King isn't much taller.......I wonder if maybe it's just about money and the size/financing capacity of the developer?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15886  
Old Posted May 7, 2025, 1:19 PM
OliverD OliverD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
I've heard a couple of theories to explain the lack of success of the Harbourfront Residences project. One was simply that condos don't sell in SJ.

The other was more nuanced and basically said that while the exterior was well done the size and the quality of the finish and features in the units themselves just wasn't up to scratch. I've never been in one but looking at realtor listings they seem "OK" but somewhat ordinary and uninspired. What people will accept in a rental isn't necessarily good enough when people are buying.

York Point and Robertson's Wharf seemed to do OK (and they seem to sell when they come on the resale market) so maybe it's the latter.

As to why 99 King isn't much taller.......I wonder if maybe it's just about money and the size/financing capacity of the developer?
Yeah, the finishings in the one unit on the market right now are pretty plain-jane and the price point is relatively high for what you're getting. 875 sq ft for a one bedroom seems fine though.

It also takes time to fill larger condo projects in smaller markets, particularly where there isn't a strong established condo market to begin with. And I think some potential buyers are perhaps not as willing to commit to that lifestyle and would prefer to rent. I know a handful of people who downsized to apartments from single family homes and in some cases they definitely were not interested in buying.

I think generally speaking right now the math works better for rental projects so that is what we're seeing. Even in Halifax it seems the majority of the larger builds are rentals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15887  
Old Posted May 7, 2025, 1:40 PM
OliverD OliverD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
Not Saint John related, but I thought people might like to see the designs for this really interesting project in a relatively nearby city to the south.



A Massive 30-Story Tower Proposed for Portland, Maine

Now that's the type of project Saint John should be aspiring to one day. I think this building has a really attractive design, especially roof the design which is evocative of Japanese and Chinese architecture.

Still hoping 99 King figures out a way to make the roof design more attractive. Maybe this project will inspire the developers of 99 King to improve the roof design, lol

I've always felt that Saint John, NB and Portland, ME have a lot of aesthetic and historical similarities... I think a similarly ambitious project could be a great addition to the Saint John skyline.

Perhaps this building will be the inspiration for a future project in Saint John... maybe Lafford's upcoming project?
If I'm not mistaken, looking at the site plan, it appears that they are proposing to place that tower in basically the middle of that block replacing what is now a small surface parking lot. Seems like a fairly challenging build being surrounded by existing buildings. I'm quite familiar with this location as I've been to the Novare Res beer bar that is adjacent to this parking lot a few times.

Interesting that this location is just two blocks away from the current tallest building in Maine, an 18 storey 264 unit apartment building that just opened last year.

I've been visiting Portland for nearly 20 years and I think the comparison is apt. You have an urban peninsula in both, with a working harbor front. I've always felt that Saint John is a couple decades behind Portland in its evolution. As Pugsley pointed out they've done a great job with infill development – not just in the core of the Old Port but also the surrounding neighbourhoods. The Munjoy Hill neighborhood, on the eastern end of the peninsula, has a mix of older single family homes and smaller multiunit buildings along with new smaller scale condo developments (think 4-12 units, up to four storeys). There's a critical mass there that allows for neighbourhood coffee shops and small restaurants and other amenities. It would be great to see Saint John's south end evolve in a similar way.

I think Portland is a great inspiration for Saint John.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15888  
Old Posted May 7, 2025, 2:12 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,633
^ Agree.

The Portland downtown and the Old Port has a lot going for it. Saint john could choose far worse places to try and emulate.

Portland's big differences from SJ though (and advantages in some ways) are overall affluence, population, lack of heavy industry, and proximity to Boston.......so kind of apples and oranges in some ways
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15889  
Old Posted May 7, 2025, 4:02 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,633
They were breaking rock at a great rate at the new MacDonald's in Millidgeville when I drove by a few minutes ago.

Last edited by sailor734; May 7, 2025 at 5:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15890  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 12:46 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is offline
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by dhottawa729 View Post
I would much rather prefer the Lantic sugar site to be a 4-storey stacked townhouse community, with higher density focused in the core of Uptown. With this much housing inventory being proposed, the demand for a prominent residential tower in the core might not be there again for quite a long time. I forget how many units are proposed for Lantic, but if the demand is there, I don’t know why 99 King didn’t go much taller. Imagine being tall enough to be above the fog. Maybe 30 stories would do it!

I also wonder if there is even a market for this much residential Uptown because Phase 2 of the Harbourfront Residences across from the cruise ship terminal still hasn’t happened, and now we have Fundy Quay and 99 King underway.
Rather a 4 storey townhouse community than what? Has there actually been anything proposed for the site?

I think there's quite a wide range of developments that could work well at that site, but it all depends on how much funding and assistance can be secured to deal with the remediation and reclamation of the site. I absolutely think this site should be a priority for all three levels of government, as there's tremendous opportunity to develop it into a mixed use development. The fact that it's connected to rail could really help facilitate a land reclamation project.

Still, the most tantalizing possibility for me, is how a tunnel project between the West Side and Uptown Central peninsula could provide a significant amount of fill to help remediate and reclaim the former sugar refinery site for development, as ultimately, any sort of project to deal with that site will involve a lot fill. I think once again, in typical SJ-SSP fashion, some posters here are overcomplicating things unnecessarily, when ultimately, any sort of plan to remediate the sugar refinery site will simply involved massive levels of fill, and the construction of a concrete seawall.

Considering it's located beside a rail spur, I don't understand why we can't get the ball rolling on funding for a remediation and reclamation project. There's a a serious level of NBism when it comes to the former sugar refinery site. It's shameful the site has simply been left to rot away as a ruin, but it's never too late to do something about it.
__________________
Peace and Athabasca and Coppermine and Slave, And Yukon and Mackenzie—the highroads of the brave. Saskatchewan, Assiniboine, the Bow and the Qu'Appelle, And many a prairie river whose name is like a spell. They rumor through the twilight at the edge of the unknown, "There's a message waiting for you, and a kingdom all your own. — Bliss Carman
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15891  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 12:47 AM
EnvisionSaintJohn's Avatar
EnvisionSaintJohn EnvisionSaintJohn is offline
New Brunswick, Canada ⛵️
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Location: Canada's first City 🍁🌊
Posts: 3,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugsley View Post
I don't disagree that there are some similarities aesthetically between the two cities, but there are some pretty significant differences allowing it to support a development like this.

First, Portland is decades ahead of Saint John when it comes to their infill developments - but this has taken time and LOTS of NIMBY-ism. We all poo poo the heritage by-laws in Saint John, but Portland is a prime example of how being strict can eventually pay off. Similar to my argument before...Uptown Saint John will grow UP when it is finished filling OUT in a proper manner. The past 15 years have been a boom in Portland for in-fill apartments, restoring older warehouses, and low-rise structures. They've added more draws for people to live downtown - like a Whole Foods and Trader Joe's. Not to mention it is consistently rated as one of the hottest up and coming culinary destinations in America. However, they've refused to compromise on heritage and design rules for decades - to preserve the general aesthetic of the old port. Every in-fill is carefully evaluated to make sure it matches the historic port feel. It meant a much slower up-ramp but eventually, it paid off. Basically, they took the walk, crawl, run approach to development and now it is on fire as people want to live there.

Second, they have a much larger population than Saint John. The Portland–Lewiston–South Portland Combined Statistical Area is roughly 680K population-wise, which is more akin to Halifax, if not larger when you add it's proximity to Greater Boston.

So while it is a nice building, I once again argue that there is no point dreaming about these towers in Uptown until we solve the infill and desirability formula. That said, I'd argue that the slower pace and attention to detail taken by Portland early on could make Saint John equally as prosperous one day..

I'm not sure why you are so insistent on things having to follow a very linear, textbook, path... I guess that's because of your background in urban planning. You clearly have a lot of good insight, but I have to disagree that there's "no point" dreaming of high rise residential towers being built in Saint John... on a forum called... get this... skyscraperpage.com It's 2025... 30 storeys is nothing... only in this part of the continent is such a building still considered a skyscraper. Yeah, building tall buildings involves a lot of capital, and a lot of coordinating with urban planners and the political elite, but they are still something we should be striving for in New Brunswick, or here specifically in Saint John. My biggest worry with your crawl, walk, run approach, other than that it reminds me of Rostow's stages of economic growth, is that it is too slow, and risks a lot of prime sites for development in the Uptown core being gobbled by 4 and 6 storey builds before we ever get past the crawling and walking stage. It's not like there's justification for all three levels of government to support some big development projects to tackle the housing crisis in Saint John. The Prime Minister says over and over again that now is the time to build... our MP says he wants to make Saint John the finest port city in the G7... I suggest Wayne Long along his former political protege, and now NB Minister for housing/ Saint John Harbour MLA- David Hickey, do their best to use their power and influence in the Carney and Holt governments and work together to get some much bigger projects in Saint John's development pipeline while they still can.

I'm with you that Saint John needs to do a better job at infill, and continue filling out, but when it comes to the "proper manner" of getting there, I think we seriously disagree on how we should get there. I don't think Saint John should necessarily have to wait for more medium sized infill projects like 99 King, the Landmark, or Fundy Quay to finish, before trying to attract developers to build something 30+ storeys. The mayor posted this photo today on Facebook:



I'd say there's lot's of room in this picture to put up a similarly ambitious and aesthetically pleasing high rise like the 30 storey proposed for Portland, and there's also lots of room for mid rise infill developments in this pic, and all around the central peninsula. I just think it's worth it to try and do both, since attracting the type of capital and experienced developers needed to get such projects done isn't something that happens quickly.

As OliverD just pointed out, this 30 storey behemoth is being built just two blocks away from the current tallest building in Maine (an 18 storey apartment building, basically the equivalent height of Brunswick Square). So again, there's some strong comparables between Saint John and Portland, despite the disparity in metropolitan populations. Maine, crazily enough, seems even more height averse, and even more protective of their church steeples than even New Brunswick , judging by the height of their tallest buildings. Yet, here they are, finally green lighting a 30 storey mixed residential development. A 30+ storey mixed use residential development is not an unrealistic dream for Saint John... it's a high achievable goal that really shouldn't be considered so pie in the sky. It's not like there's no shortage of billionaires and moneyed interests in New Brunswick to fund such ambitious projects here in Saint John. It's also a dream or goal that can be worked towards independently, and not to the detriment of continued infill development priorities... multi faceted development priorities are not just possible, they are desirable.


Looking at Maine's tallest buildings, something similar to style to the Time and Temperature Building (circled)[/URL] is the type of building that Saint John should be striving for infill developments throughout the central peninsula... if we want to keep things to an aesthetic standard. Irving Oil's new HQ building proved that new buildings can enhance the skyline with simple and classic style. Concrete buildings don't need to be ugly, they can be very aesthetically pleasing. Here's some examples of early skyscrapers that are especially aesthetically pleasing, including the first skyscraper in the world, Canada's first skyscraper, and Maine's first skyscraper. Buildings that evoke these type of classic styles using modern methods would greatly enhance the Saint John skyline and add to the vibe of the city in a tremendous way, that ten or twenty 4 storey or 6 storey builds can never achieve.


The style and quality of buildings Saint John should be aspiring to see built as infill developments within the city centre.

Considering it was possible to make these beautiful buildings using the technology, capital, and resources of the early 1900's, it should be more than possible to put a modern spin on these classic designs, and raise the standard of what we want to see built in Saint John. The Ingalls building, built in 1903 simply looks incredible, imagine replicating a very similar style building in Saint John re-envisioned as a mixed use residential development. Saint John should try and prioritize mid rise and high rise infill developments above six storeys in the central core of the city, as they will increase density far more than 6 storey and below builds will. Plus, if too many 4-6 storey infill projects are granted approval in the short term, the city will be selling it's long term potential short. As you say, Portland has done a really good job preserving their heritage and done a much better job with their infill developments than Saint John has.

Saint John should be trying to raising the bar for what's being built, and I don't just mean aim for taller builds... I mean raise the bar for the style and quality of new builds, especially stuff in the city centre. 99 King should have never been approved as is, and the city should still push for aesthetic improvements to the roof. If they can build something this beautiful in Winnipeg in 1903, our city leaders sure as hell should be pushing for something better than what has been proposed for 99 King in 2025... especially considering that the initially approved renderings were far less aesthetically offensive than the updated renderings.

Moncton has a 30 storey residential project in their pipeline... Saint John should be trying to get its own 30+ storey project next. Saint John is the 5th largest coastal CMA in the country, yet, a very, very small percentage of housing in the Saint John CMA actually has coastal views. Ocean views mean something in real estate, no matter how much fog Sailor or our friends from Moncton claim there is in the coastal neighbourhoods of Saint John, there's still tremendous value to be unlocked by here in Saint John for ambitious mid rise and high rise developments with ocean views, and such developments needn't be confined to the Uptown/central peninsula... though projects uptown should be held to a higher aesthetic standard.

With significant funding and assistance from all three levels of government, and reliable partners in the private sector, Saint John could start planning for much bigger projects, while continuing to prioritize and improve on mid rise infill developments, and filling out the rest of the city's housing stock.


***I guess I should have also added Moncton's proposed 30 storey Infinity Tower to this list.

As this "what if" wikipedia entry shows... I still think a public private partnership that re-develops Brunswick Square into it's full, 36 storey potential as a mixed used residential development, would be a catalytic project worth massive levels of governmental funding. Not only would it be an ambitious project that would increase the housing stock in the direct, city centre, it would be a catalytic project that would have ripple effects throughout the Uptown core. Unlike building on top of a parking lot, or an infill development, this project has already completed 19 storeys, ... it's a truly unique development opportunity, and the quickest way to jumpstart Saint John's entry into the 30+ storey club, which Moncton is about to join, and Halifax has been the only member of in the maritimes since the 1970's. It's definitely not a typical type of development idea, but it was part of the initial designs for Brunswick Square... I also wouldn't say it's totally out of line with Prime Minister Carney's vision for building our way out of the housing crisis, and getting us through these troubled economic times.

This would be the type of project that could finally attract a real grocery store and reinvigorate Brunswick as a shopping destination. It would also be a huge example the government could literally point at and say, "look what we've done for the housing crisis in New Brunswick"... and look what we've done to fix one of the deadest, and most dismal malls in all of Canada. Topping out Brunswick Square to it's full 36 storey potential as a mixed residential development isn't essential to fixing Brunswick Square... but I really do think a residential re-development and expansion of the tower the best possible option for "fixing" or reinvigorating Brunswick Square... because, is there really a better option for fixing or reimagining a dead shopping mall, than building housing for hundreds of people directly on top of it? Building an ambitious residential development right there at Brunswick Square would help achieve the goal of filling the mall back up with stores, restaurants, bars, and even some entertainment venues like a KTV bar, arcade, or VIP cinema, that will be needed to re-draw people back in to Brunswick Square. It's definitely a challenging goal to accomplish, but it's a unique opportunity, and one that would deserve major government funding assistance and partnership.


________


Once again, I'll remind everyone, Brunswick Square was selected as the location for a design competition on the main Canada forum... though I suspect thread creator TorontoDrew would be open to possibly expanding the location for the competition to be the entirety of Saint John's Uptown central peninsula. I will post and ask... as that might result in some more interesting submissions.

I certainly don't want to give the impression that re-developing and expanding Brunswick Square is the only option to get a 30+ storey building built in Saint John, as it certainly isn't ... though, it could possibly be the quickest way to get a 30+ storey project realized in Saint John, as once redevelopment plans were finalized, the 19 storey head start in construction would be pretty undeniable. But mostly, I just think it's a very interesting and unique possibility... a possibility that's been part of the engineering and architectural designs of the the project since its inception in the 1970's.

Nonetheless, the far more important discussion to Saint John's future, of course, is on how to improve the city's broader strategy for infill developments throughout the city... be they low rise, mid rise, high rise, or mixed use developments. I remain hopeful that we here at SSP can all continue to be part of the conversation about moving forward and pushing for better and more ambitious developments here in Saint John, a city that many of us care about deeply and have a lot of attachments to... I just hope we can also try and keep the name of the forum in mind sometimes... and aim higher here. SSP is truly one of the most unique and interesting forums left on the web... and it's especially interesting that the Atlantic Canadian sub forum is so disproportionately active.

Last edited by EnvisionSaintJohn; May 8, 2025 at 10:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15892  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 11:55 AM
Pugsley Pugsley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 586
You seem pretty rigid Envision on the belief that a skyscraper is a catalyst for growth in a city's core. However, it has been proven multiple times from studies and scholars that a single tower does very little to rejuvenate a downtown. In fact, most Urbanists and Urban Planning Academics would argue that socially and economically healthy cities are actually ones that have a consistent degree of mixed-use density across a dense and highly-walkable plat - think Paris, Barcelona, Amsterdam, etc. Cities with a consistent mix of these uses results in more people on the street and a more vibrant socio-economic environment.

I get this site is called Skyscraperpage, but it doesn't mean that your proposals are best practice. When I say walk, crawl, run - I will again repeat myself - I am referring to the need for the Uptown to prove itself as a place people want to live and worth investing in. For example, last evening I walked through City Hall and Brunswick Square. It was completely dead at 5pm. Even the City Market was lacklustre activity-wise, and this was right after work. But there was some activity on the street and the restaurant we went to was busy. That said, most were those that had driven into the core for the BTO concert, not locals who walked there or lived nearby - according to the owner.

If the Uptown is to grow, then it needs to see these empty blights turned around. You do that, not by building a single residential tower (or turning one into residences) and hope they spill out into the area - studies show that does not happen. Instead, you develop a variety of housing types in the area by renovating existing spaces, building new complimentary in-fill to the area's aesthetic, and other incremental improvements to improve the desirability of the area. These things are all happening right now, some by people I believe are active on this site.

This leads to more families and small businesses moving to the area (AKA - Gentrification), which results in improved streetscape vibrancy and activity, which in turn spurs greater confidence from private and corporate investors to make more serious investments. This is how Portland's Downtown was transformed. Small, incremental improvements that snowballed into a vibrant and desirable place to live. And NOW, they are getting a signature tower in their downtown like you'd desire in Uptown. That tower would NEVER have happened 20 years ago in a Portland that was dirty, full of empty storefronts, and had few people living there. However, it is feasible today because the area has proven itself as both desirable to live and economically viable through thoughtful and incremental changes that made it more desirable to live.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15893  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 1:03 PM
bridgeoftea's Avatar
bridgeoftea bridgeoftea is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugsley View Post
You seem pretty rigid Envision on the belief that a skyscraper is a catalyst for growth in a city's core. However, it has been proven multiple times from studies and scholars that a single tower does very little to rejuvenate a downtown. In fact, most Urbanists and Urban Planning Academics would argue that socially and economically healthy cities are actually ones that have a consistent degree of mixed-use density across a dense and highly-walkable plat - think Paris, Barcelona, Amsterdam, etc. Cities with a consistent mix of these uses results in more people on the street and a more vibrant socio-economic environment.

I get this site is called Skyscraperpage, but it doesn't mean that your proposals are best practice. When I say walk, crawl, run - I will again repeat myself - I am referring to the need for the Uptown to prove itself as a place people want to live and worth investing in. For example, last evening I walked through City Hall and Brunswick Square. It was completely dead at 5pm. Even the City Market was lacklustre activity-wise, and this was right after work. But there was some activity on the street and the restaurant we went to was busy. That said, most were those that had driven into the core for the BTO concert, not locals who walked there or lived nearby - according to the owner.

If the Uptown is to grow, then it needs to see these empty blights turned around. You do that, not by building a single residential tower (or turning one into residences) and hope they spill out into the area - studies show that does not happen. Instead, you develop a variety of housing types in the area by renovating existing spaces, building new complimentary in-fill to the area's aesthetic, and other incremental improvements to improve the desirability of the area. These things are all happening right now, some by people I believe are active on this site.

This leads to more families and small businesses moving to the area (AKA - Gentrification), which results in improved streetscape vibrancy and activity, which in turn spurs greater confidence from private and corporate investors to make more serious investments. This is how Portland's Downtown was transformed. Small, incremental improvements that snowballed into a vibrant and desirable place to live. And NOW, they are getting a signature tower in their downtown like you'd desire in Uptown. That tower would NEVER have happened 20 years ago in a Portland that was dirty, full of empty storefronts, and had few people living there. However, it is feasible today because the area has proven itself as both desirable to live and economically viable through thoughtful and incremental changes that made it more desirable to live.
I think everyone would love to have a Barcelona or Paris style streetscape with restaurants and shops underneath 4-6 story, visually appealing buildings.

As much as Envision loves to pull out the ocean view graphic on all threads, I think there needs to be much more medium density infill and gentrification throughout uptown instead of throwing a 40 story glass tower.

That's not to say, I wouldn't love to have a 40 story glass tower with a nice restaurant on top haha.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15894  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 1:06 PM
bridgeoftea's Avatar
bridgeoftea bridgeoftea is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 687
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailor734 View Post
"Active Transportation"........another multi million dollar infrastructure project to be used by a tiny handful of people......but hey, it's green and it's in and it looks good.
Question, has this started this week? I got stuck in traffic coming over from the west side on Chesley and thought to use the Simond light crossing to get to the north end but it's blocked off and they've started tearing up parts of the road along the side walks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15895  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 6:03 PM
OliverD OliverD is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnvisionSaintJohn View Post
Rather a 4 storey townhouse community than what? Has there actually been anything proposed for the site?

I think there's quite a wide range of developments that could work well at that site, but it all depends on how much funding and assistance can be secured to deal with the remediation and reclamation of the site. I absolutely think this site should be a priority for all three levels of government, as there's tremendous opportunity to develop it into a mixed use development. The fact that it's connected to rail could really help facilitate a land reclamation project.
Why spend a ton of money here when there is still so much room for infill development of all kinds of sizes all over the peninsula?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15896  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 6:18 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by bridgeoftea View Post
Question, has this started this week? I got stuck in traffic coming over from the west side on Chesley and thought to use the Simond light crossing to get to the north end but it's blocked off and they've started tearing up parts of the road along the side walks.
Looks like it. I came back from uptown today by way of the Viaduct and Main St. Down to one lane in places and lots of machinery digging.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15897  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 6:21 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by OliverD View Post
Why spend a ton of money here when there is still so much room for infill development of all kinds of sizes all over the peninsula?
^this. The old sugar refinery site will be a challenge to developers (and costly) I can’t see much happening there unless all the other, easier sites are developed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15898  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 9:11 PM
Pugsley Pugsley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 586
Quote:
Originally Posted by bridgeoftea View Post
I think everyone would love to have a Barcelona or Paris style streetscape with restaurants and shops underneath 4-6 story, visually appealing buildings.

As much as Envision loves to pull out the ocean view graphic on all threads, I think there needs to be much more medium density infill and gentrification throughout uptown instead of throwing a 40 story glass tower.

That's not to say, I wouldn't love to have a 40 story glass tower with a nice restaurant on top haha.
Yes, a 40-storey tower would be great. But, as we both agree... we need to be realistic. And yes, I do love Envision's spirit and passion for height at the same time.

I really love some of the infill projects we've seen over the past few years. I can't remember the name of it but the one that is red brick on Canterbury (or nearby?) is a great example. Retail on the ground and apartments above. I would say that with Fundy Quay and the King Street project, and another 10 solid infill projects like the one mentioned, would be key to us getting Brunswick Square filled, a more vibrant City Market, and eventually, some taller structures. If we could add another 250-300 housing units in the Uptown through a variety of low-mid rise (i.e. 4-5 floor) infill developments that match the aesthetic of the heritage structures, or further restoration and re-purposing of some vacant ones, we'd be on the right path towards what is needed to shift the development needle from a larger-scale investment perspective.

We are definitely on the right track.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15899  
Old Posted May 8, 2025, 10:01 PM
sailor734 sailor734 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 2,633
Given all the old brick 3-4 story buildings uptown I'm surprised there haven't been more small scale condo conversions.

Last edited by sailor734; May 9, 2025 at 8:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15900  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 12:00 AM
bingun bingun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 1,046
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugsley View Post
Yes, a 40-storey tower would be great. But, as we both agree... we need to be realistic. And yes, I do love Envision's spirit and passion for height at the same time.

I really love some of the infill projects we've seen over the past few years. I can't remember the name of it but the one that is red brick on Canterbury (or nearby?) is a great example. Retail on the ground and apartments above. I would say that with Fundy Quay and the King Street project, and another 10 solid infill projects like the one mentioned, would be key to us getting Brunswick Square filled, a more vibrant City Market, and eventually, some taller structures. If we could add another 250-300 housing units in the Uptown through a variety of low-mid rise (i.e. 4-5 floor) infill developments that match the aesthetic of the heritage structures, or further restoration and re-purposing of some vacant ones, we'd be on the right path towards what is needed to shift the development needle from a larger-scale investment perspective.

We are definitely on the right track.
I think you are referring to Telegraph Square on Canterbury. If so, it is a nice building with Lordon in the retail unit below.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:51 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.