NEW YORK | 655 Madison Ave | 1,162 FT | 74 FLOORS

[NYguy]

Ruh roh..


https://therealdeal.com/new-york/202...of-view-fraud/

Buyer of 520 Park’s $80M penthouse sues Zeckendorfs over obscured views
Complaint seeks to rescind sale over Extell’s planned skyscraper





By Jake Indursky
Research by Matthew Elo
March 25, 2025

The owner of the last penthouse to sell at 520 Park Avenue is having buyer’s remorse.

The buyer, identified as Park Ave. Condo LLC, filed a lawsuit against the property’s developers, William Lie Zeckendorf and Arthur Zeckendorf, after purchasing Unit DP-PH-63 for $78.9 million in November.

The buyer claimed that the Zeckendorfs knew of an impending skyscraper that was “all but certain to ruin the Penthouse’s unobstructed Central Park view, the unit’s defining feature.”

The offending skyscraper comes from Extell Development’s Gary Barnett, who bought three 60th Street lots from Solil Management for $103 million earlier this month. The assemblage is next to 655 Madison Avenue, where Extell had already planned a 62-unit residential tower and commercial space.

The buyer alleges in the complaint that Extell and Solil had made “secret plans” to develop a skyscraper that covers the entire assemblage and “will tower over 520 Park Avenue.”

The buyer alleged that the Zeckendorfs were privy to this non-public information because of “their status as part of a small circle of New York City real estate insiders,” and did not disclose it because of their desperation to offload the penthouse at a good price.

The offering plan does disclose that west-facing windows on apartments, including the original triplex, are “considered amenities that can potentially be lost,” and also includes a general disclosure that “no representation is made that future construction in the neighborhood surrounding the Property will not result in obstruction of views.”

But the buyer claimed that none of the 26 amendments to the plan included a disclosure suggesting the west-facing windows faced a “specific, existing risk of obstruction.”

Attorneys for the Zeckendorfs in a statement dismissed the complaint.

“Our clients reject these baseless allegations as a shameless attempt to renegotiate a binding agreement,” said attorneys Terrence Oved and Darren Oved. “They fully expect the court will see this action for what it is — a transparent case of buyer’s remorse masquerading as a complaint — and readily dismiss it.”