Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef
Thanks. I was not aware of this detail. Up to now, I was neutral on this proposal as long as the freeway stayed within its existing footprint with no widening that would further intrude on the historic neighborhoods on both sides. I'm now leaning against this knowing that it would lead to the loss of a bike/ped bridge.
|
Same, here. Anything reducing non-vehicle flexibility is a no for me, we need more of this not less. Especially downtown. That really shouldn't be hard to fix, right?
Threaded Mode