Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi
Looks like the shortened proposal is also a fair bit wider to make up for the height chop. I generally prefer thinner high-rises for aesthetic reasons plus more light/air for the streetscape, but in this case I am all for Fern Hill making the tower as wide as possible to block the maximum number of NIMBY views:

GREC via Urbanize
|
Did they not make the tower taller but narrower like half a year ago to satisfy NIMBYs (Because it reduces size of shadow or something), and now they are making the tower shorter but wider to satisfy NIMBYs?
Why do we even try to satisfy NIMBYs in the first place, we all know that doing so is an impossible feat
Quote:
Originally Posted by pullmanman
Email from Old Town Friends for Responsible Development. Predictable gripes:
|
Also, really, screw these guys. Are the homes of 350+ people/families really worth more than your "Neighborhood Character" (Especially when the tower is surrounded by so many similarly scaled towers!)
I'm so tired of Lincoln Park NIMBYs