HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 3:14 PM
pullmanman pullmanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 110
Email from Old Town Friends for Responsible Development. Predictable gripes:

Quote:
Old Town Friends

Dear Neighbors, We are shocked and disappointed that both the Alderman and Developer ignored the community’s wishes and are pushing through a project that is wrong for the character of Old Town. Old Town Friends for Responsible Development, Old Town Triangle Association, and the Old Town Merchants and Residents Association, three community organizations that opposed the plan, received a last-minute notice of a ‘compromise’ from the Alderman’s office. None of the community groups had input or were given the opportunity to counter.

This is NOT a compromise; these changes are breadcrumbs used to mislead and confuse the public. It’s clear the Alderman did not include the community in compromise discussions because the Alderman and Developer both know the community OPPOSES this project as it currently stands, including the upzoning of the area, and would never support this so-called compromise. Despite what you may read with percentages & reductions, please recognize that this compromise is only 1 story less than the original proposed building from 2023. In 2023, the building proposed was 395’ (36 stories); when the PD was submitted it became 480’ (44 stories); and today’s “compromise” landed at 379’ (37 stories). Again, this is not a compromise!

Old Town Friends will continue to fight this proposal & massive tower, and we hope you will join us. We cannot be silenced. We love our community and will not let irresponsible developers quell our efforts. To read Alderman Hopkins’ view of this project click here.

Best, Old Town Friends
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 3:43 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,839
Looks like the shortened proposal is also a fair bit wider to make up for the height chop. I generally prefer thinner high-rises for aesthetic reasons plus more light/air for the streetscape, but in this case I am all for Fern Hill making the tower as wide as possible to block the maximum number of NIMBY views:


GREC via Urbanize
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 4:25 PM
BuildThemTaller BuildThemTaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Island City, NY
Posts: 1,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Looks like the shortened proposal is also a fair bit wider to make up for the height chop. I generally prefer thinner high-rises for aesthetic reasons plus more light/air for the streetscape, but in this case I am all for Fern Hill making the tower as wide as possible to block the maximum number of NIMBY views:


GREC via Urbanize
Imagine looking at these and still claiming that the tower is "out of character" with the neighborhood. NIMBYs live in an alternate reality where a shadow causes cancer or something like that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 4:30 PM
pullmanman pullmanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 110


Unit count decreased but total square footage seems similar? Much larger units on average than the initial proposal. This is from Alderman Hopkins FAQs on the project posted last night. He justifies it as supporting family sized units.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 5:51 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,777
380' is still nice for the area. I hope they can go ahead and that the NIMBYs don't rain on the parade again. Of course they'll try.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 6:20 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,777
February 2025 Plan Commission

1600, 1620, 1609-1641 & 1647 N. La Salle Dr.;
1601 N. Wells St.; and 130 & 200 W. North Ave.
(Lincoln Park, 2nd Ward)

Quote:
A proposed amendment to and expansion of Business Planned Development No. 89 and Lakefront Protection Ordinance application, submitted by Old Town Triangle Partners I LLC, for the property generally located at 1600, 1620, 1609-1641 & 1647 North La Salle Drive; 1601 North Wells Street; and 130 & 200 West North Avenue. The applicant proposes to amend Planned Development No. 89 to establish four subareas and add a 379-foot-tall, mixed-use building with 349 dwelling units and ground-floor retail space to Subarea B. Subarea B improvements will also include 285 accessory vehicle parking spaces and three off-street loading spaces. Existing Subarea A improvements include a 3-story religious assembly building and two one-story retail buildings. Existing subarea C and D improvements include a 3-story commercial building and a 3-story single family home, for which no changes are proposed, respectively. The overall maximum FAR for the planned development will be 5.0.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 6:27 PM
Jstange059's Avatar
Jstange059 Jstange059 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2023
Location: Chicago
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
Looks like the shortened proposal is also a fair bit wider to make up for the height chop. I generally prefer thinner high-rises for aesthetic reasons plus more light/air for the streetscape, but in this case I am all for Fern Hill making the tower as wide as possible to block the maximum number of NIMBY views:


GREC via Urbanize
Did they not make the tower taller but narrower like half a year ago to satisfy NIMBYs (Because it reduces size of shadow or something), and now they are making the tower shorter but wider to satisfy NIMBYs?
Why do we even try to satisfy NIMBYs in the first place, we all know that doing so is an impossible feat


Quote:
Originally Posted by pullmanman View Post
Email from Old Town Friends for Responsible Development. Predictable gripes:
Also, really, screw these guys. Are the homes of 350+ people/families really worth more than your "Neighborhood Character" (Especially when the tower is surrounded by so many similarly scaled towers!)

I'm so tired of Lincoln Park NIMBYs
__________________
@that-person.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 6:40 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,777
Lol...

Quote:
Old Town Friends

Dear Neighbors, We are shocked and disappointed that both the Alderman and Developer ignored the community’s wishes and are pushing through a project that is wrong for the character of Old Town. Old Town Friends for Responsible Development, Old Town Triangle Association, and the Old Town Merchants and Residents Association, three community organizations that opposed the plan, received a last-minute notice of a ‘compromise’ from the Alderman’s office. None of the community groups had input or were given the opportunity to counter.

This is NOT a compromise; these changes are breadcrumbs used to mislead and confuse the public. It’s clear the Alderman did not include the community in compromise discussions because the Alderman and Developer both know the community OPPOSES this project as it currently stands, including the upzoning of the area, and would never support this so-called compromise. Despite what you may read with percentages & reductions, please recognize that this compromise is only 1 story less than the original proposed building from 2023. In 2023, the building proposed was 395’ (36 stories); when the PD was submitted it became 480’ (44 stories); and today’s “compromise” landed at 379’ (37 stories). Again, this is not a compromise!

Old Town Friends will continue to fight this proposal & massive tower, and we hope you will join us. We cannot be silenced. We love our community and will not let irresponsible developers quell our efforts. To read Alderman Hopkins’ view of this project click here.

Best, Old Town Friends

Their dismay is my glory.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 7:42 PM
glowrock's Avatar
glowrock glowrock is offline
Becoming Chicago-fied!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago (West Avondale)
Posts: 19,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1 View Post
Lol...




Their dismay is my glory.
I normally don't wish for people to be eliminated from the gene pool but these imbeciles need to be permanently removed. Absolutely disgusting!
__________________
"Deeply corrupt but still semi-functional - it's the Chicago way." -- Barrelfish
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 8:05 PM
twister244 twister244 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,224
A bit off topic..... But do these people realize they are harming the neighborhood in the long run? If you run developers out of the area, then they will stop trying to build in this part of town. There are so many other parts of the city now that developers can easily put up new towers, etc.......

It's just such short-sided thinking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 8:27 PM
Lakeviewguy Lakeviewguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 38
NIMBYs will never be appeased. The strategy is simple--delay, delay, delay until perhaps the market turns and kills the project organically. Let's hope that the economy stays stable and that Fern Hill is able to move forward with this. This project is going to eliminate both gas stations; add much needed residential units; and add to commercial vitality; and improve the walkability of the LaSalle-North intersection. Really, what is there not to like? As an aside, it's hard to believe that there is still an Amoco at Clark and Lasalle. (In the 1960s, there was a gas station on N. Michigan Ave.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 10:21 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,839
When all else fails the NIMBYs can always try to sue, like the mental midgets in Lincoln Park who wasted their money trying in vain to stop the Lincoln Common project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2025, 11:23 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by r18tdi View Post
When all else fails the NIMBYs can always try to sue, like the mental midgets in Lincoln Park who wasted their money trying in vain to stop the Lincoln Common project.
I'm all for fools being separated from their money. Let them pay for lawyers if they want
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2025, 9:03 PM
Lakeviewguy Lakeviewguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 38
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
I'm all for fools being separated from their money. Let them pay for lawyers if they want
I would be very surprised if they sue. It's a loser of a case, and I don't think any of these people are going to spot the cash needed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2025, 3:58 PM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,901
Of course they wont. If they *really* cared as much as they claim, then they would put up the money to buy out the developer (likely at a very handsome price), then turn this into a park and pay the property taxes in perpetuity.

But they won't. Complaining is free, after all.
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2025, 4:24 PM
dreamy-developer's Avatar
dreamy-developer dreamy-developer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by left of center View Post
Of course they wont. If they *really* cared as much as they claim, then they would put up the money to buy out the developer (likely at a very handsome price), then turn this into a park and pay the property taxes in perpetuity.

But they won't. Complaining is free, after all.
That is honestly 99% of nimby's motivation - people of all kind absolutely love to complain about anything and feel they're making a greater difference to their community, even when they deep down don't know of the real outcome. A majority of these people (once this is built) will forget about it, and move onto the next development they fear will "destroy" their neighborhood.
__________________
All I want are bus lanes on Michigan Ave
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2025, 12:16 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,777
391 ft | 36 floors

391 FT | 36 FLOORS

379 is to the roof and doesn't include the penthouse/elevator overrun.

The title height & floor count should be modified to reflect the changes.


February 2025 Plan Commission Presentation

https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city...025/1600_N_La_Salle_CPC_Presentation.pdf

__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2025, 10:50 PM
Zapatan's Avatar
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,777
Nice, still well into high-rise territory.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2025, 12:37 AM
left of center's Avatar
left of center left of center is offline
1st Ward
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: The Big Onion
Posts: 2,901
Tall and thin would have been so much better for the neighborhood than squat and fat. All NIMBYs are idiots, but these NIMBYs specifically are quite literally of sub human intelligence. Enjoy the shadows, turds!
__________________
"Eventually, I think Chicago will be the most beautiful great city left in the world." -Frank Lloyd Wright
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2025, 1:14 PM
sentinel's Avatar
sentinel sentinel is offline
Plenary pleasures.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CHI/MRY
Posts: 4,732
The developers know the game, they played the NIMBY crowd and idiot alderturd like a fiddle, and now have an approved highrise that is essentially what they initially proposed…and what was also most likely their original plan to begin with.
__________________
Don't be shy. Step into the light.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.