Quote:
Originally Posted by DyAm00394
This was the original site plan back in January 2024, back when both buildings were to be 6-stories. Now one of them is 12-stories, so I would think same placement, just one is taller.

|
Building the first (eastern) one directly into the hillside is a bold move. Sounds challenging. Maybe a taller structure would be too geotechnically challenging for this space.
Destroying the General Hospital was an equal architectural loss to Union Station or the Customs House, except it happened when we should have known much better.
There absolutely must be ample office space to move Service Canada out of that awful box elsewhere on the peninsula. Too bad they just (IIRC) renewed their lease with the new owner. Same with
20 Alma. Per that image, I had no idea the southeast portion of that property was a different PID. What's the elevation difference between Alma and Delhi anyway? 2.5/3 storeys? That hillside could be built into with (Dehli-side) ground- and 2nd-storey parking without messing up a viable streetscape, but would probably work best if the three PIDs towards Waterloo were part of the project too.
Odd to see vitriol directed at Saint John for not magicking skyscrapers into existence and blaming 'NIMBYs'. I don't think there's been any proposed for 'NIMBYs' to attack. The only public NIMBYism has been pretty typical opposition to dropping 3/4-storey apartment buildings in single family neighbourhoods, and PAC has basically ignored it. It's not Charlottetown, there's no IRAC, and PAC is not stopping anything. There's enough to complain about in this city without windmill tilting.
Same with heritage conservationists. What exactly has the Heritage Board stalled or prevented from being built? Saint John would be better off today if a board existed and interfered with Brunswick Square (forced them to keep the King St facades like Market Square did) and maybe stopped King Square North turning into a parking lot.
I recently saw a letter to council (in last week's agenda, or maybe the previous week) that proposed eliminating the two-staircase requirement for six-storey buildings. The amount of space and variety of designs this would open up, especially on atypically shaped or small lots, is incredible. Some great examples here:
https://secondegress.ca/Manual-of-Illegal-Floor-Plans
You want dense infill, start with things like this. Elevator plus two staircases means you get locked into very, very limited designs.