Quote:
Originally Posted by nname
Looks like DL will be increasing YVR service for S25
YVR-SLC will increase to 3x daily E75
YVR-MSP will increase to 3x daily 320
|
I just noticed this too, was gonna post it but was too slow

I am glad to see these increases for sure. From YVR, the emergence of SEA as a DL hub really came at the expense of SLC and MSP. SLC used to be mainline sometimes, and MSP was 3x or 4x daily summer usually. But that was when they were our main DL connection airports. But SEA all of a sudden created a close connecting airport with many of the same markets (by no means as hefty as SLC or MSP in terms of domestic connections, but SEA's emergence definitely siphoned off SLC/MSP traffic. So I don't see the relative weakness on MSP and SLC as an overall loss, because the 7x SEA flights more than make up for it. So that's why going back up to 3x daily for MSP and SLC is a confidence boost from DL. And I have mentioned before that DL and WS should be thought of as one for transborder service, they are that coordinated now. Not just for YVR, but all over (mainly Western Canada though). I am still shocked WS is operating daily to both DTW and BOS, and then ATL is 15x friggin weekly, that's so wild to me still. Considering how it was only seasonal from ATL and DTW and not typically multiple daily frequencies, the WS offering is better than we got from DL. And BOS is a DL hub lite, we likely would have waited a long time to ever have DL serve BOS-YVR. They didn't even keep the JFK service, so no hope for BOS. So WS is majorly stepping up and broadening their transborder offerings to non-resorty destinations like BOS, BNA, and DTW. Between DL and WS, there is ample service. Of course, NYC is a giant black hole unfortunately. DL has hubs at both LGA and JFK. I only ever thought of JFK as an option, but then in the last few weeks, YYC suddenly has Saturday LGA service from WS
and AA, wtf lol! So now it's even more stark for me, losing CX and DL is bigger than gaining B6, sorry!
Not sure why AA chose YYC for a once weekly thing, common assumption is that YVR would've been first, but obviously not

So YVR will have 3x daily to EWR (AC and UA) and then 1x daily to JFK (JetBlue). And YYC is 1x daily to EWR (AC), 1x daily to JFK (WS), 1x weekly to JFK (AA and WS). I am not questioning the strong demand for NYC<>AB, it's obviously there. Ahem, it is the ONLY transborder route AC kept after butchering YYC operations; they used to do at least SFO, LAX, LAS, IAH, and I think even ORD plus EWR. Now is their only route, and it's just 1x daily, I would've thought UA would've taken over like they did on all the other routes. Anyways, my point is that demand is there, and I'm not questioning that. I wouldn't think twice if WS doubled its capacity to JFK, it's just the randomness of the AA to LGA add that threw me. WS adding it, makes sense! They are a behemoth at YYC, it's exactly how fortress hubs like ATL or DXB just keep adding and adding, that's what happens with such a strong player. But AA adding it instead of YVR, just seems strange. Not having any OneWorld or Skyteam service to LGA or JFK is bizarrre, considering how well served we are by DL/WS otherwise. It's no big deal if terms of pax #s, it's more just weird how such a major market like NYC has no service from the two biggest airlines at their own two hubs, but AC/UA can do 4x from Newark? AA or DL should have been able to get in there to take some of the pie. AC and UA never used to be double daily each, there was more than enough there yet they both bowed out, so weird. Come on AA, you couldn't even give us 1x weekly JFK Saturdays?! And it's the busy cruise day lol, Saturdays were also huge for transborder, US carriers would always add the random summer weekend flights ie. one or two weekend flights to places like MEM, STL, DTW, I think even IAD was sometimes weekend only. It would make so much sense to have a once weekly to LGA to capture this on top of the huge demand already. If we can get CLT daily, we should be able to get 1x NYC....