Quote:
Originally Posted by New Brisavoine
By the way, the interview of Ignatieff that I posted on the other page is very interesting. It's quite long (25 minutes), and he says lots of things, about the history of Canada, the politics, etc. What strikes me in this interview is (but perhaps it's inevitable given that he's interviewed by the Financial Times from London) Canada seems like a solely Anglophone country. Appart from a brief mention at one point in his interview of a "Francophone and Anglophone divide" (but he really says no more than those 3 words), you could never suspect that Canada is also a Francophone country if you didn't know. He also argues that the future leadership of the Liberal Party could "mobilize British opinion" (I quote him, mobilize British opinion to defend Canada against Trump) with figures like Mark Carney and Chrystia Freeland who have great networks in London.
It strikes me how an interview about the exact same subject (the future of Canada with Trump's threats) conducted by a French journalist from Paris and interviewing a French Canadian politician would have a very distinct sound to it, with Canada seeming like a very different country from the one one hears in that interview.
.
|
Interestingly enough, Michael Ignatieff has fairly significant family ties to both France and Quebec.
Of Russian origin, his forebears were close to the last Czar, Nicholas II. They first fled to France, and then to Canada where they initially settled in Quebec.
He does speak pretty decent (academic) French, but he's a Toronto guy through and through.
But even these guys forget about us sometimes.