HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1301  
Old Posted May 15, 2024, 4:06 PM
FarmerHaight's Avatar
FarmerHaight FarmerHaight is offline
Peddling to progress
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Vancouver's West End
Posts: 1,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
I miss the massing of bayshore and marinaside crescent where, instead of one or two slabs monopolizing the view, views to the water can be had for many buildings/units as far as 2-3 blocks inland, which from the other side of the water means a more layered skyline
Here's an idea: if you want to see the water, how about getting out of your apartment and walking two or three blocks to the abundance of parkland and other public spaces that abut Vancouver's waterfront?

Perhaps on the southern side of False Creek shorter or tiered buildings should be a priority to preserve sunlight on the Seawall, but on the north side build tall and dense please.
__________________
“Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of riding a bike” – John F Kennedy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1302  
Old Posted May 15, 2024, 5:36 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,672
...

Last edited by jollyburger; May 15, 2024 at 5:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1303  
Old Posted May 17, 2024, 5:36 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by FarmerHaight View Post
Here's an idea: if you want to see the water, how about getting out of your apartment and walking two or three blocks to the abundance of parkland and other public spaces that abut Vancouver's waterfront?

Perhaps on the southern side of False Creek shorter or tiered buildings should be a priority to preserve sunlight on the Seawall, but on the north side build tall and dense please.
For Burrard/Georgia, sure. But I personally think most of the city needs to hit 1.5 FSR first, then a few other things, before 10 FSR minimums across the peninsula is even remotely justified.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1304  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2024, 3:25 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,485
Safe to assume this whole plan will be reworked in light of the viewcone amendments?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1305  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2024, 3:47 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Safe to assume this whole plan will be reworked in light of the viewcone amendments?
I doubt you'll see any dramatic changes. Maybe at most 10-15 storeys on certain sections. They already had 30 storey towers planned for the area and some 40 storey/425 feet towers near the new Georgia/Pacific intersection. And they still want it to step down near the edges regardless of the view cone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1306  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2024, 4:35 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,485
With any increased height allowed there will be less pressure to squeeze in so many squat buildings. I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1307  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 9:43 PM
mcj mcj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: New West
Posts: 1,190
Concord Pacific released an updated plan, all renderings and quotes posted below are from this Vancouver Sun article.

Quote:
On Tuesday, Concord Pacific shared preliminary details with Postmedia News of its proposal to bring 5,000 homes in 12 towers — including some of the city’s tallest skyscrapers — as well as dozens of restaurants, shops, and services to the northeast shore of False Creek.
Quote:
At this stage, the developer’s vision for what it calls “Concord Landing” includes 12 towers. The lower buildings closer to the waterfront would be around 20 storeys, with taller buildings of around 50 storeys just to the north. The tallest buildings would be the “landmark towers” flanking Georgia Street, which Webb said could “go to 60 to 65-plus storeys, whatever is appropriate.”




Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1308  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 9:49 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,736
The heights make more sense now. Appreciate the City to tweak the restrictions.

Great opportunity to incorporate a nice mall or shopping centre there. It's the only way to liven up the nearby Entertainment District.

Concord should also just build around the viaducts, since the City has not money to take them down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1309  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 9:51 PM
cyclinginvancouver cyclinginvancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 85
"This project will depend on the long-planned but delayed demolition and removal of the Georgia and Dunsmuir viaducts, which run along the north side of Concord’s property.

A previous Vancouver council, under then-mayor Gregor Robertson and his Vision majority, voted in 2015 to remove the viaducts to free up land for housing and park space. At that time, it was reported that the viaducts’ removal could begin by 2017 and finish by 2020. But progress stalled, and after those dates passed, the city said it was not possible to provide a timeline for the viaducts’ removal, because the project needed to be funded by contributions from developers in the area.

Webb said Tuesday that Concord’s recent conversations with Vancouver’s planning department have made it “pretty clear” the city is still motivated to take the viaducts down, he said."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1310  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 9:59 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,672
This will hopefully change the scale of any development at the Plaza of Nations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1311  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 10:16 PM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post

Concord should also just build around the viaducts, since the City has not money to take them down.
They waited 35 years for the city to pull their pants down and assume the position so they didn't have to foot a penny to do it themselves.
Telling them to build around it I can assure you Concord will sit on the land for another 30 years and resubmitting new ideas for the land if it means waiting for the city to do it for them.
There's over a quarter of a billion dollars in investment potential there and a hundred grand every five years for fancy drawings is a drop in the bucket.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1312  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 10:32 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,616
I only hope that when this happens it will have Senakw style building speed with 3+ towers under construction at the same time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1313  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 10:38 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,823
Are these just renderings or are they finally submitting an application? (I don't have a newspaper subscription).
Pretty art tho.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1314  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 10:44 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,616
Just a drawing. Planning to submit an application "in the coming months."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1315  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 10:47 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,663
Interesting how Rogers Arena tower 3 is included in the 12.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1316  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 10:48 PM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Are these just renderings or are they finally submitting an application? (I don't have a newspaper subscription).
Pretty art tho.
I think we can assume these are accurate to what they plan to submit, subject to how city staff respond to the rezoning inquiry.

Quote:
Concord plans to submit a rezoning inquiry to city hall within the next few months, Webb said, after which the company will work with city staff on a plan with the hope to submit a formal rezoning application by the end of this year.
From Dan Fumano, The Vancouver Sun https://vancouversun.com/news/post-viaduct-future-northeast-false-creek-new-plan-concord-pacific
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1317  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 10:55 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by madog222 View Post
I think we can assume these are accurate to what they plan to submit, subject to how city staff respond to the rezoning inquiry.


From Dan Fumano, The Vancouver Sun https://vancouversun.com/news/post-viaduct-future-northeast-false-creek-new-plan-concord-pacific
Ah yes thank you. So enquiry submission let's assume end of March ("coming months"), City review 3-4 months? So pre August break response.

If Concord likes the response they drum up a rezoning application package and submit at the end of 2024. Seems like a rushed timeline for a group that is in no... rush.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1318  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 11:18 PM
Planner 9 Planner 9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 6
Nefc

Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Seems like a rushed timeline for a group that is in no... rush.
There's a friendly mayor and council in place now.

July 2024: View cones removed/reduced.
October 2026: Next city election.

Hence the window of opportunity to get the rezoning approval.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1319  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 11:26 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 4,823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Planner 9 View Post
There's a friendly mayor and council in place now.

July 2024: View cones removed/reduced.
October 2026: Next city election.

Hence the window of opportunity to get the rezoning approval.
Fair enough, and I guess if they apply before December 2025 they might get a Conditions Letter and rezoning enacted before Oct 2026. I wonder what a different council could enforce or extract from this site though? I can't see CAC requirements increasing under any circumstance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1320  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2025, 11:31 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,672
Here's the old 2018 massing from CIVITAS



https://spacing.ca/vancouver/2018/01/25/video-vancouver-northeast-false-creek-animation/

Also on CIVITAS' website (high res images in their gallery as well with one overhead site plan)

Quote:
CIVITAS has developed the master plan for Concord Landing: Northeast False Creek's new Waterfront District, which will be an opportunity to create a vibrant and accessible neighbourhood on Vancouver’s False Creek for both locals and visitors to enjoy.

The Master Plan concept represents a proposal for an exciting waterfront development with a mix of uses and activities and its’ own special character, identity and sense of place. The plan was informed by inspiring global examples of urban waterfronts and mixed-use neighbourhoods and the elements that made them successful.

Features of the Concept include:

A New Waterfront Experience: A mixed-use housing and retail/dining district that will provide an active publicly accessible waterfront promenade, Georgia Wharf, unique to Vancouver. The neighbourhood will feature a ground plane activated with a mix of shops, cafes and restaurants lining a fine-grained network of pedestrian walkways and public access along the entire waterfront.

New Parks and Gathering Places: 3.2 acres of new public park space as part of this rezoning, in addition to the new Creekside Parks lands created from Concord Pacific and City lands, producing a total of 13.98 acres of new public park space.

New Housing: The NEFC Waterfront District will deliver approximately 5,000 new homes including a component of non-market homes, to be determined through this Rezoning process. This new market and non-market housing will increase the general housing supply in the City of Vancouver and the Metro area without demolishing or displacing existing homes and/or tenancies.

New Job Space: The retail and commercial component will contribute toward meeting the goals of the Metro Core Jobs and Economy Land Use Plan by providing space for an estimated 700 jobs.

New Arts and Culture Opportunities: The Master Plan creates places for the integration of public art to be developed with the City in coordination with the City’s NEFC Public Art Plan. New places for street performance, artisan retail and artist space are included in the plan.

New Public Amenities: Space will be included for a new Community Policing Centre as well as a 69-space Child Care Facility with an outdoor play area.
https://www.civitasdesign.com/projects/northeast-false-creek
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:32 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.